| ☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
| ☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| ☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
| ☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
| ☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
| ☒ | No fee required. |
| ☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
| ☐ | Fee computed on table |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | Applied Materials, Inc.
Santa Clara, California 95054 (408) 727-5555 |
January 26, 202224, 2024
Dear Fellow Shareholders:
On behalf of the Board of Directors, we are pleased to invite you to attend Applied Materials’ 20222024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held on Thursday, March 10, 2022,7, 2024, at 11:10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. This year’s Annual Meeting will be conducted virtually due to the public health concerns resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to support the health and well-being ofCentral Time at our shareholders, employees, and community. The Annual Meeting will be held onlineoffices at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022 and will provide shareholders with the opportunity to participate and submit questions as they would at an in-person meeting.9700 US 290 East, Building 37, Austin, Texas 78724.
We encourage you to read this Proxy Statement because it contains important information for voting your shares and sets forth how the Board oversaw your investment over the past year. This year’s Proxy Statement reflects our continued focus on our business strategy, an engaged and effective Board, sound corporate governance and executive compensation practices, our Environmental, Social, and Governancesustainability strategy, and our regular dialogue with and responsiveness to our shareholders.
Financial Performance and Business Strategy
In fiscal 2021,2023, Applied Materials delivered record revenue, earnings and cash flow, and we are outgrowing the best financial performancewafer fabrication equipment market for the fifth year in company history while navigating ongoing challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic.a row. Our revenuesrevenue increased 34%3% and earnings per share increased 63%9% year-over-year, despite semiconductor and we generated record annual cash flows from operations. We also continued to make substantial progress towards our 10-year roadmap for environmental and social responsibility.wafer fabrication equipment spending both being down in 2023.
As we look ahead, we remain very positive about our long-term growth opportunities. TheSemiconductors are the foundation of digital transformation that will affect nearly every sector of the global economy accelerated in fiscal 2021, makingthe coming years. The strategic importance of semiconductors more strategically important tois increasing throughout the world, than at any other timeand Applied Materials is in history. The Interneta great position to benefit from this exciting period of Things (IoT), big data,industry innovation and artificial intelligence (AI) are fueling increased demand for semiconductorsgrowth. We have the industry’s broadest portfolio of products and driving the need for next-generation silicon technologies. At the same time, the industry is increasingly adopting a new playbook for drivingtechnologies that enable improvements in chip performance and power performance, area, cost,consumption, and time-to-market (PPACt™). Withwe are collaborating closely with our broad portfoliocustomers to accelerate development and commercialization of highly enabling solutions, Applied Materials is strongly positioned to deliver innovations that accelerate our customers’ PPACt roadmaps and create significant value for our shareholders.next-generation technologies.
Shareholder Engagement and Demonstrated ResponsivenessMaking Possible a Better Future
We also continued to make strong progress towards our 10-year sustainability roadmap, which considers our direct impact and how we run our business (1X), our industry’s impact and those of our customers and suppliers (100X), and how our technology can be used to advance sustainability on a global scale (10,000X). Among our other achievements, we continued to make progress toward our 2030 greenhouse gas emission goals – which were validated in 2023 by the Science Based Targets initiative, strengthen our culture of inclusion, and accelerate sustainable innovation, including improving the energy efficiency and longevity of our products. We also designed and deployed a Net Zero 2040 Playbook to work collaboratively across our industry to reduce and mitigate our climate impact. We are committed to significantly reducing our impacts by bringing improved efficiency across our global operations, using cleaner, renewable energy and enabling groundbreaking technology innovation.
An Independent, Diverse and Skilled Board
This year’s director nominees possess a wide range of backgrounds, skills and experience, and further our Board’s commitment to maintain a composition that aligns with the Company’s evolving business and strategic needs. With a balance of tenures, a diversity of personal characteristics and experiences, and a range of skills – including relevant subject matter expertise – our Board is well-positioned to oversee Applied’s management team and support Applied’s long-term strategy. This Proxy Statement also includes information about the Board’s governance practices – including its active and ongoing Board refreshment process, annual self-evaluation, independent leadership and committee practices – that foster this effective oversight.
Robust Shareholder Engagement
We remain committed to effective corporate governance that is informed by our shareholders, promotes the long-term interests of our companyCompany and its shareholders, and strengthens the Board’s and management’s accountability.
We have Our corporate governance practices are enhanced by a robust shareholder engagement program, which includes regular outreach to holders of more than half of our outstanding shares. Our shareholder engagement program that focuses on issues of interest to our shareholders, particularly in the areas of governance, compensation, environmental sustainability, and human capital matters such as diversity, equity and inclusion. Our shareholder outreach program is a recurring, year-round effort, led by a cross-functional team that includes members of our Investor Relations, Global Rewards, ESG, and Legal functions, with participation of independent directors where appropriate. Shareholder feedback continues to directly inform the Board’s decision-making on a variety of important matters.
Thank you for your continued investment in and support of Applied Materials.
Sincerely,
Thomas J. Iannotti Chairman of the Board |
Gary E. Dickerson President and Chief Executive Officer |
Notice of 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
 | When | Thursday, March 7, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. Central Time | ||||
| Where |
Applied Materials, Inc., 9700 US 290 East, Building 37, Austin, Texas 78724
| ||||
 | | Who Can Vote | |
| ||
NOTICE OF
2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Thursday, March 10, 2022
at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time
The 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Applied Materials, Inc. will be held on Thursday, March 10, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time. Due to the public health concerns resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our shareholders, employees, and community, the Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting held online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022 via a live webcast. Shareholders of record at the close of business on January 12, 2022 and holders of proxies for those shareholders may attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. You will be able to vote and submit questions online through the virtual meeting platform during the Annual Meeting. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person. Please see “Virtual Annual Meeting” on page iv for additional information.
Items of Business
1.To elect ten directors to serve for a one-year term and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. |
2. To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year |
|
|
|
Your vote is important to us. You may vote via the Internet or by telephone, or if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, by signing, dating and returning your proxy card. If you are voting via the Internet or by telephone, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 9, 2022.6, 2024. For specific voting instructions, please refer to the information provided in the following Proxy Statement, together with your proxy card or the voting instructions you receive by e-mail or that are provided via the Internet.
If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on how to access the proxy materials via the Internet, a proxy card was not sent to you, and you may vote only via the Internet, unless you have requested a paper copy of the proxy materials, in which case, you may also vote by telephone or by signing, dating and returning your proxy card. Shares cannot be voted by marking, writing on and returning the Notice of Internet Availability. Any Notices of Internet Availability that are returned will not be counted as votes. Instructions for requesting a paper copy of the proxy materials are set forth on the Notice of Internet Availability.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Teri A. Little Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary
|
Santa Clara, California
January 26, 202224, 2024
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be held on March 10, 2022: 7, 2024: The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.
TABLE OF CONTENTSTable of Contents
Page | ||||
| i | ||||
| i | ||||
| i | ||||
| ii | ||||
| iii | ||||
| iv | ||||
| v | ||||
| Proposal | 1 | |||
| 1 | ||||
| Board and Corporate Governance Practices | ||||
| 12 | ||||
| 12 | ||||
| 13 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
Director | 18 | |||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | ||||
| 21 | ||||
| 22 | ||||
| 22 | ||||
| 24 | ||||
| 24 | ||||
| 24 | ||||
| 24 | ||||
| Director Compensation | 26 | |||
| 26 | ||||
| 28 | ||||
| Stock Ownership Information | 29 | |||
| 29 | ||||
| 30 | ||||
| Proposal | ||||
| 31 | ||||
| Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 32 | |||
| 32 | ||||
| 38 | ||||
| 39 | ||||
Reconciliation of non-GAAP adjusted financial measures used in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, other than as part of disclosure of target levels, can be found in Appendix A.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements, including those regarding anticipated growth and trends in our businesses and markets, industry outlooks market share,and demand drivers, technology transitions, our business, strategies and financial performance, our investment and growth strategies, our development of new products and technologies, our sustainability goals and capabilities,commitments, and other statements that are not historical fact, and actual results could differ materially. Risk factors that could cause actual results to differ are set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of, and elsewhere in, our 20212023 Annual Report on Form 10-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements are based on management’s estimates, projections and assumptions as of the date hereof, and Applied Materials undertakeswe undertake no obligation to update any such statements.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
2022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY Proxy Statement Summary
2024 Proxy Statement Summary
Your proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Applied Materials, Inc. We are making this Proxy Statement available to shareholders beginning on January 26, 2022.24, 2024. This summary highlights information contained in detail elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. We encourage you to read the entire Proxy Statement for more information prior to voting.
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
| Date and Time: | March | |
| Location: | ||
| Record Date: | January | |
| Voting: | Shareholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals to be voted on. | |
| Attendance: | Shareholders and their duly appointed proxies may attend the meeting. | |
Proposals and Board Recommendations
| For More Information | Board Recommendation | |||||||||
PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors | Pages 1 to |
| FOR each Nominee | |||||||
Rani Borkar | Gary E. Dickerson | Yvonne McGill | ||||||||
Judy Bruner | Thomas J. Iannotti | Scott A. McGregor | ||||||||
Xun (Eric) Chen Aart J. de Geus | Alexander A. Karsner
| |||||||||
PROPOSAL 2 – Executive Compensation | ||||||||||
Page 31 |
| |||||||||
Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year | ||||||||||
PROPOSAL 3 – Ratification of Registered Accounting Firm | Page |
| FOR | |||||||
Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year | ||||||||||
PROPOSAL 4 – Shareholder Proposal Regarding | Pages |
| AGAINST | |||||||
Shareholder proposal requesting that the | ||||||||||
PROPOSAL 5 – Shareholder Proposal Regarding | ||||||||||
| Pages 72 to 75 |
| AGAINST | |||||||
Shareholder proposal requesting that the Company report on quantitative median and adjusted pay gaps across race and gender | ||||||||||
Director Nominees Proxy Statement Summary
Name and Occupation
| Age
| Director Since
| Independent
| Committees | ||||
Rani Borkar |
60 |
2020 |
✓ |
Strategy and Investment | ||||
Corporate Vice President, Azure Hardware Systems and
| ||||||||
Judy Bruner |
63 |
2016 |
✓ |
Audit (Chair) | ||||
Executive Vice President, Administration and Chief
| Governance (Chair)
| |||||||
Xun (Eric) Chen |
52 |
2015 |
✓ |
Compensation | ||||
Managing Partner, SB Investment Advisers (US), Inc.
| Strategy and Investment
| |||||||
Aart J. de Geus |
67 |
2007 |
✓ |
Strategy and Investment | ||||
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Co-Chief Executive
| ||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson |
64 |
2013 | ||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer, Applied Materials, Inc.
| ||||||||
Thomas J. Iannotti |
65 |
2005 |
✓ |
Compensation (Chair) | ||||
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Enterprise
| ||||||||
Alexander A. Karsner |
54 |
2008 |
✓ |
Compensation | ||||
Senior Strategist, X (parent company: Alphabet Inc.)
| Governance
| |||||||
Adrianna C. Ma |
48 |
2015 |
✓ |
Audit | ||||
Operating Partner, Index Ventures
| Strategy and Investment
| |||||||
Yvonne McGill |
54 |
2019 |
✓ |
Audit | ||||
Corporate Controller and Infrastructure Solutions Group
| Governance | |||||||
Scott A. McGregor |
65 |
2018 |
✓ |
Strategy and Investment | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer, Broadcom
| (Chair) Audit |
Director Nominees
Name and Occupation
| Age
| Director Since
| Independent
| Committees
| ||||
Rani Borkar Corporate Vice President, Azure Hardware Systems and Infrastructure, Microsoft Corporation | 62 | 2020 |
| Compensation Strategy and Investment | ||||
Judy Bruner Executive Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer, SanDisk Corporation (retired) | 65 | 2016 |
| Audit (Chair) Governance (Chair) | ||||
Xun (Eric) Chen Executive Chairman, ParityBit Technologies, Inc. | 54 | 2015 |
| Compensation Strategy and Investment | ||||
Aart J. de Geus Executive Chair of the Board of Directors, Synopsys, Inc. | 69 | 2007 |
| Strategy and Investment | ||||
Gary E. Dickerson President and Chief Executive Officer, Applied Materials, Inc. | 66 | 2013 |
|
| ||||
Thomas J. Iannotti Senior Vice President and General Manager, Enterprise Services, Hewlett-Packard Company (retired) | 67 | 2005 |
| Compensation (Chair) | ||||
Alexander A. Karsner Senior Strategist, X (parent company: Alphabet Inc.) | 56 | 2008 |
| Compensation Governance | ||||
Kevin P. March Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Texas Instruments, Incorporated (retired) | 66 | 2022 |
| Audit | ||||
Yvonne McGill Chief Financial Officer, Dell Technologies Inc. | 56 | 2019 |
| Audit Governance | ||||
Scott A. McGregor President and Chief Executive Officer, Broadcom Corporation (retired) | 67 | 2018 |
| Strategy and Investment (Chair) Audit | ||||
| ii |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Board Practices and Composition
Ensuring the Board is composed of directors who possess a wide variety of relevant skills, professional experience and backgrounds, bring diverse viewpoints and perspectives, and effectively represent the long-term interests of shareholders is a top priority of the Board and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.Committee (the “Governance Committee”). Our Board composition reflects strong Board practices that support regular refreshment based on our board needs, evolving strategy, and proactive succession planning.
Director Nominee Expertise
Key Attributes
* Ethnically diverse means a director who self-identifies as one or more of the following (defined by Nasdaq as an Underrepresented Minority): African American or Black, Alaskan Native or Native American, Asian, Hispanic or Latinx, or Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander.
|
|
Proxy Statement Summary
Board Practices Support Thoughtful Board Composition
Board Composition to Support Company Strategy |
The Board and the
|
Policy on Board Diversity |
The Board is committed to having a Board that reflects diverse perspectives, including those based on gender, ethnicity, skills, experience at policy-making levels in areas that are relevant to the Company’s global activities, and functional, geographic or cultural background. The Board has adopted a Policy on Board Diversity as part of its Corporate Governance Guidelines, which highlights its commitment to actively seek out women and ethnically diverse director candidates.
|
Annual Board Evaluations |
The Board conducts an annual self-assessment of the Board, Board Committees and individual directors to evaluate effectiveness.
|
Board Refreshment |
The Board believes the fresh perspectives brought by new directors are critical to a forward-looking and strategic Board when appropriately balanced by the deep understanding of Applied’s business provided by longer-serving directors.
|
Director Succession Planning |
The
|
We are committed to effective corporate governance that is informed by our shareholders, promotes the long-term interests of our shareholders, and strengthens Board and management accountability.
Governance Highlights
| Annual Election of Directors | |
| Independent Chair of the Board | |
| Highly Independent Board (9 of 10 Director nominees) and Committees | |
| Annual Board, Committee and Individual Evaluations | |
| Robust Board Succession Planning | |
| Policy on Board Diversity | |
| Active Shareholder Engagement Practices | |
| Shareholder Right to Call a Special Meeting | |
| Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| iv | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Proxy Statement Summary
Shareholder Engagement
We believe that strong corporate governance should include regular engagement with our shareholders to enable us to understand and respond to shareholder concerns. WeIn addition to the regular meetings that our CEO, CFO and Investor Relations team holds with investors, prospective investors and investment analysts, we have a robust shareholder outreach program led by a cross-functional team that includes members of our Investor Relations, Global Rewards, ESG and Legal functions. Independent members of our Board are also involved, as appropriate. In the fall, we proactively solicit feedback on our executive compensation program, corporate governance practices, and sustainability and diversity and inclusion initiatives, as well as any matters voted on at our prior annual meeting. After the filing of our proxy statement, we engage again with our shareholders about important topics to be addressed at our annual meeting. Following our annual meeting, we reviewour Board of Directors, led by its Human Resources and Compensation Committee (the “HRCC”) and Governance Committee, reviews the results of the meeting and investor feedback, as well as evaluate emerging trends in corporate governance and other areas. We share feedback we receive from our shareholders with the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the full Board. See “Shareholder Engagement” on page 1422 for more information.
ThisIn response to shareholder support at last year’s Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual format through a live webcast. You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting if you were a shareholder as of the close of business on January 12, 2022, the record date, or hold a valid proxyannual meeting for the meeting. To be admittedproposal to lower the ownership threshold required for shareholders to call a special meeting to 10%, as part of our shareholder outreach in 2023, we also asked our shareholders about their views on our special meeting right. The feedback we received from our shareholders on this topic was reviewed and discussed with our Governance Committee and the Board. In response to the Annual Meetingfeedback and the support for the proposal at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022, you must enterlast year’s annual meeting, in December 2023 the 16-digit control number found on your NoticeBoard approved an amendment and restatement of Internet Availability, proxy card, orour Bylaws to lower the voting instructions you receive by e-mail. Beneficial shareholders who did not receiveownership threshold required to call a 16-digit control numberspecial meeting from their bank or brokerage firm and who wish20% to attend the meeting should follow the instructions from their bank or brokerage firm, including any requirement to obtain a legal proxy. Most brokerage firms or banks allow a shareholder to obtain a legal proxy either online or by mail. The meeting webcast will begin promptly at 11:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on March 10, 2022. We encourage you to access the webcast prior to the scheduled start time of the Annual Meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual Annual Meeting, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual shareholder meeting log in page. For information on how to vote your shares, please see “Questions and Answers about the Proxy Statement and our 2022 Annual Meeting”10%. See “Shareholder Engagement” on page 60 of this Proxy Statement.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
We are committed to ensuring that shareholders will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. Our directors and members of our management team will join the virtual meeting and be available for questions and we are committed to answering all relevant questions we receive during the meeting. Shareholders may submit questions during the meeting through the virtual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022. We will address as many questions during the meeting as time permits, but if there are any questions that cannot be addressed due to time constraints or for any other reason, we will post answers to such questions on our website following the meeting. If we receive substantially similar questions, we may group them together and provide a single response to avoid repetition. Only questions that are relevant to the purpose of the Annual Meeting or our business will be answered.
Company Overview
Applied Materials is the leader in the materials engineering solutions used to produce virtually every new chip and advanced display in the world. Our expertise in modifying materials at atomic levels and on an industrial scale enables customers to transform possibilities into reality. At Applied Materials, our innovations Make Possible® a Better Future.
We develop, design, produce and service semiconductor and display equipment for manufacturers that sell into highly competitive and rapidly changing end markets. Our competitive positioning is driven by the ability of our talented workforce to identify major technology inflections early, and to develop highly differentiated materials engineering solutions for our customers to enable those technology inflections. Through our broad portfolio of products, technologies and services, innovation leadership and focused investments in research and development, we are enabling our customers’ success and creating significant value for our shareholders. Applied’s ability to hire, develop and retain a world-class global workforce is based on our commitment to creating a Culture of Inclusion that embraces different backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences to build stronger, more resilient teams. Consistent with our core values, we enable our employees to do their best work by providing quality training, learning and learningcareer development opportunities; promoting diversity, equity and inclusion;a connected and inclusive culture; and upholding a high standard of ethics and respect for human rights.
In addition to our other accomplishments, we’ve made significantwe continue to make strong progress towards our 10-year road map for environmental and social responsibility.responsibility, which we introduced in 2020. At Applied, making a positive contribution is at the foundation of our culture and of our vision to Make Possible® a Better Future. Our 1x, 100x and 10,000x sustainability framework refers to the holistic goals and commitments we’ve set for our operations, how we work with customers and suppliers, and how our technology can be used to advance sustainability on a global scale. In 2023, we announced our Net Zero 2040 playbook – a clear pathway and detailed plan to work across our industry, including with customers and supply chain partners, to reduce the semiconductor industry’s carbon emissions. More details of Applied’s ESGsustainability vision and strategy, including a copy of the Company’s most recent Sustainability Report, can be found at https://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/corporate-responsibility.
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | v |
Proxy Statement Summary
Our Performance Highlights
Over the past several years, our broad portfolio of products and services has madeenabled Applied a more resilient companyto extend its leadership at the major technology inflections that can perform wellare driving our customers’ roadmaps and future industry growth. In fiscal 2023, we delivered record revenue, earnings and cash flow, and we are outgrowing the wafer fabrication equipment market for the fifth year in a variety of market environments. In 2021, we delivered the best financial performance in Applied Materials’ history while navigating a dynamic and challenging environment impacted by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.row. Key highlights of our financial outperformance include:
Record revenue of |
Record |
Record |
Highlights of five-year performance achievements across key financial measures
Revenue Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Margin Non-GAAP Adjusted EPS +57% $14.7B FY2017 $23.1B FY2021 +3.7 PTS 28.0% FY2017 31.7% FY2021 +105% $3.33 FY2017 $6.84 FY2021
Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin and non-GAAP adjusted EPS are performance targets under our long-term incentive and bonus plans. See Appendix A for non-GAAP reconciliations.
Key financial highlights for our reporting segments in fiscal 20212023 include the following:
Semiconductor Systems segment: we |
Applied Global Services segment: we grew revenue to a record |
Display and Adjacent Markets segment: we delivered revenue of |
Strategic and Operational Highlights
Applied’s strategy is to deliver highly differentiated materials engineering products and services that enable major technology inflections and drive our customers’ success.
See inflections early Identify customers' High Value Problems Develop Differentiated Valuable Sustainable products Ensure customer success + Generate residual value
| vi | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
The
Proxy Statement Summary
Semiconductors are at the foundation of the digital transformation that will affect almost every sector of the global economy accelerated in fiscal 2021, making semiconductors more strategically important toover the world than in any time in history.coming years. Long-term megatrends including the Internet of Things (IoT), big data and artificial intelligence (AI) are fueling increased demanda new era of growth for semiconductors and driving the need for next-generationadvancements in silicon technologies. Applied Materials has focused its strategy and investments to deliver innovations that accelerate improvements in the power, performance, area, cost and time-to-market (PPACt™) of next-generation semiconductor devices. Key strategic and operational accomplishments during fiscal 20212023 include:
|
We |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
|
|
In our services business, we grew our industry-leading installed base to more than 48,000 systems, increased the number of systems under service agreement to 16,600, and added new types of subscription agreements including sensor and AI-based solutions. In addition, we signed a unique environmental services agreement with a customer that helps reduce electricity consumption and carbon emissions. |
| » | We continued to make substantial progress towards our 10-year roadmap for environmental and social responsibility, as described in more detail on |
Total Shareholder Return Performance
In fiscal 2021, our2023, Applied delivered strong total shareholder return, (“TSR”) performance reflected increased demand for semiconductors and wafer fab equipment driven by the digital transformationas a result of the global economy.Company’s ability to deliver record financial results in a down year for the wafer fabrication equipment market. As shown below, for the five year period beginning with fiscal 2019, Applied has substantially outperformed the S&P 500 Index, and our peer group over the past five years, reflecting the company’s ability to create unique and innovative materials engineering solutions that accelerate itsour customers’ technology roadmaps. In addition, from the close of market on the last trading day of fiscal 2021 through the close of market on December 31, 2021, Applied’s stock price increased by approximately 15%.
Fiscal 20172019 – Fiscal 20212023 Total Shareholder Return vs. S&P 500 and Proxy Peers1
450% 400% 350% 300% 250% 200% 150% 100% 50% 0% FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 402% 231% 138% AMAT FY21
| 1 | Reflects results from October 28, 2018 through October 29, 2023. Proxy peer data reflects the companies in Applied’s current compensation peer group approved by the HRCC in June 2023, as described on page 39, weighted by market capitalization. |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | vii |
Proxy Peers S&P 500Statement Summary
1Reflects results from October 31, 2016 through October 29, 2021, sourced from S&P Capital IQ. Proxy peer data reflects companies set forth on page 31, weighted by market capitalization.
Key Compensation Actions
Performance-Based Compensation Decisions. The Board’s Human Resources and Compensation Committee (the “HRCC”)HRCC approved an aggressive set of performance goals for the executive officers for fiscal 2021,2023, including challenging financial and operational targets above any levels that Applied had achieved indespite a difficult external landscape, including macro-economic uncertainty, a complex geopolitical environment and an anticipated down year for the past, as well as equally challenging operational targets. No adjustments were made during the year to the performance goals or to the Company’s results in determining incentive payouts.wafer fabrication equipment market. During fiscal 2021,2023, Applied delivered exceptional financial and operational results, meeting or exceeding most of its stretch objectives for the year in a continuing challenging environment, and made meaningful progress towards our long-term strategic goals that remain focused on enabling strong longer-term revenue and EPS growth. As a result, bonus payouts for the executive officers were, on average, modestly above target. No adjustments were made during the year to the performance goals or to the Company’s results used in determining incentive payouts.
As part of our multi-year incentive program, for the period of 2019fiscal 2021 through 2021,2023, the HRCC approved aggressivechallenging goals for non-GAAP adjusted operating margin and relative total shareholder return. The results for this three-year performance period significantly exceeded target performance levels, resulting in above-target vesting of performance share unit awards forgranted to our executive officers.officers in fiscal 2021.
Value Creation Awards. As described in the Company’s 2021 proxy statement, in early fiscal 2021 the HRCC approved long-term value creation awards for Mr. Dickerson, Mr. Durn and Dr. Raja (the “Value Creation Awards”). The HRCC concluded that an incremental incentive opportunity would (i) strengthen the alignment of the officers’ interests with those of the Company’s shareholders, during a period when Applied can take advantage of significant value creation opportunities resulting from rapid changes in the technology industry, and (ii) help secure the benefit of the officers’ leadership in a highly competitive market for proven executive talent among technology companies, as underscored by Mr. Durn’s subsequent departure. As a result of a number of months of careful deliberation of award design, the awards were structured to:
|
|
|
Mr. Durn forfeited his award as a result of his departure. The HRCC does not expect to grant similar awards in the coming years. For additional information regarding the Value Creation Awards, please see page 39.
ESG Objective. We have added ESG objectives to the fiscal 2021 annual incentive plan, to measure and incentivize progress towards our long-term ESG goals. While the Company’s ESG goals are long-term in nature, the HRCC believes that it is important to annually assess progress towards those goals. As a result, the HRCC included ESG objectives in the annual incentive program, rather than in long-term incentive awards. For additional information regarding the annual incentive program, please see page 31. For additional information regarding the Company’s ESG goals and accomplishments, please see page xii.
Chief Financial Officer Transition. In October 2021, we announced the departure of our prior Chief Financial Officer, Daniel J. Durn, and the appointment of Robert J. Halliday as Applied’s interim CFO while the Company conducts a search for Mr. Durn’s successor. The structure of the compensation approved for Mr. Halliday, as detailed on page 42, reflects the anticipated limited-term nature of his appointment.
| viii |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Proxy Statement Summary
Primary Compensation Elements and Executive Compensation Highlights for Fiscal 20212023
The primary elements of our compensation program consist ofare base salary, annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive awards. Other elements of compensation include a 401(k) savings plan, deferred compensation benefits and other benefits programs that are generally available to all eligible employees. Primary elements and highlights of our fiscal 20212023 compensation program for our named executive officers (“NEOs”) (except for Mr. Halliday) were as follows:
| Element of Pay | Structure | Highlights | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(see page 40) |
»Fixed cash compensation for performing expected day-to-day responsibilities
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
»Reviewed annually and adjusted
| »Reflecting (i) continued strong performance across the business, driven by our executive leadership, »Reflecting the increased responsibilities of his role assumed in late fiscal 2022, the HRCC approved a salary increase of 37% for Mr. Deane for fiscal 2023 »Reflecting the HRCC’s belief that CEO compensation should be predominantly tied to long-term results, the Committee has not increased the salary for our CEO since December 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Annual Incentive Bonus (see page |
| »Variable cash compensation
»Based on performance
»Includes assessment of the Company’s progress towards
»Financial and non-financial metrics provide a comprehensive assessment of executive performance
»Performance metrics evaluated annually
»NEO annual incentives determined through a three-step performance
|
| »No increase in target bonus as a percentage of base salary from fiscal
»The initial performance hurdle for fiscal
»Resulting payouts ranged from
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Long-Term Incentives
|
|
»PSUs vest based 50% on achievement of 3-year non-GAAP adjusted operating margin goal and 50% on 3-year TSR relative to the members of the S&P 500 Index
»PSUs vest at end of 3-year performance period, based on achievement of performance goals; RSUs vest ratably over 3 years |
| »The target mix of
»Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin is a key measure of our Company’s long-term success
»Relative TSR incentivizes management to outperform the market in any business environment
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Proxy Statement Summary
Pay Mix
In fiscal 2021,2023, a significant portion of our executiveexecutives’ compensation consisted of variable compensation and long-term incentives. As illustrated below, 95%96% of CEO compensation for fiscal 20212023 consisted of variable compensation elements, and 84%90% of CEO compensation was delivered in equitylong-term incentive awards with multi-year vesting.
Fiscal | ||
CEO | All Other NEOs | |
| ||
 |  | |
| 1 |
|
1 Represents total direct compensation for fiscal 2021, including the grant date fair value of annual equity awards but not including the grant date fair value of the Value Creation Awards, which are not expected to be made in subsequent years and are not representative of ongoing compensation.
2 Excludes Mr. Durn, whose fiscal 2021 compensation reflects only partial-year service, and Mr. Halliday, whose fiscal 2021 compensation is not representative of ongoing NEO compensation.
Summary of 20212023 Total Direct Compensation
The following table summarizes elements of annual total direct compensation for our NEOs for fiscal 2021,2023, consisting of (1) base salary received during the year, (2) actual annual incentive bonus payout and (3) long-term incentive awards (the grant date fair value of stock awards). This table excludes amounts not considered by the HRCC to be annual total direct compensation, such as certain other amounts required by the SEC to be reported in the “All Other Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table (see page 4554 of this Proxy Statement). Additionally, the grant date fair value of the Value Creation Awards is shown separately as these awards are not expected to be made in subsequent years and are not representative of annual total direct compensation.
| Name and Principal Position | Salary(1) ($) | Annual ($) | Annual ($) | Total ($) | Value ($) | |||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson |
| 1,049,808 |
|
| 2,039,400 |
|
| 16,696,405 |
|
| 19,785,613 |
|
| 15,014,064 |
| |||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja |
| 648,135 |
|
| 1,195,703 |
|
| 4,780,991 |
|
| 6,624,829 |
|
| 4,619,937 |
| |||||
Senior Vice President, Semiconductor Products Group | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour |
| 653,942 |
|
| 974,152 |
|
| 4,501,365 |
|
| 6,129,459 |
|
| — |
| |||||
Senior Vice President, Services, Display and Flexible Technology | ||||||||||||||||||||
Om Nalamasu |
| 552,789 |
|
| 848,513 |
|
| 3,019,654 |
|
| 4,420,956 |
|
| — |
| |||||
Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Halliday(3) |
| 268,500 |
|
| 351,844 |
|
| — |
|
| 620,344 |
|
| — |
| |||||
Interim Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn(4) |
| 681,635 |
|
| — |
|
| 5,312,294 |
|
| 5,993,929 |
|
| 4,619,937 |
| |||||
Former Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position | Salary ($) | Annual ($) | Annual ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson President and Chief Executive Officer | 1,030,000 | 1,631,520 | 23,951,048 | 26,612,568 | ||||||||||||
Brice Hill Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Global Information Services | 708,846 | 1,019,304 | 5,530,849 | 7,258,999 | ||||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja President, Semiconductor Products Group | 740,000 | 1,091,475 | 6,636,826 | 8,468,301 | ||||||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer | 625,385 | 742,203 | 4,037,503 | 5,405,091 | ||||||||||||
Timothy M. Deane Group Vice President, Applied Global Services | 574,947 | 733,590 | 3,097,266 | 4,405,803 | ||||||||||||
| x |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Pay and Performance
The HRCC sets aggressive performance goals for the CEO, as well as for the entire executive leadership team. As a result, despite outstanding TSR growth from fiscal 2017 through 2021, our CEO’s ongoing total direct compensation has remained within a comparable range over the same period. Given the non-recurring nature of the Value Creation Award granted to Mr. Dickerson in early fiscal 2021, that award is not reflected in the chart below. However, the HRCC intends to take the value of that award into consideration when making future compensation decisions for Mr. Dickerson.
Total Direct Compensation (1) Total Shareholder Return (2) $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 Value of $100 Invested on 10/27/2017 FY2017 $14.5 FY2018 $13.7 FY2019 $13.9 FY2020 $17.1 FY2021 $19.8 $60 Annual Total Director Compensation ($ million) $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
Our Commitment to ESGSustainability
Our Approach
Applied is committedOur unique industry position comes with responsibility to growing its business in a sustainableour employees, customers and socially responsible manner. We are focusing our resources and capabilities on addressing the sweeping technological challenges insociety. In the era of Artificial Intelligence and big data,the Internet of Things, we are committed to working across the technology ecosystem to “Make Possible a Better Future” for our shareholders and working with our customers to build a safer, more equitable, and sustainable future.other stakeholders.
At the heart of Applied’s valuessustainability vision and strategy is a commitmentfocus on how we can use our technology and people to operate with responsibility and integrity while making a positive contribution tostrengthen our industry, improve our communities and the world around us.enable leading innovation – all with an additional focus on limiting our environmental footprint. To drive change and innovation, we invest in our research and development, operations, supply chain, and interactions with our local communities. We are committed to advancing sustainability, not only through improvements in our own operations but also through investing in technological innovation. We are also committed to transparency and have aligned our disclosures and objectives with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and leading Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) reporting standards and frameworks such as those developed by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD) and CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project).
To learn more about Applied’s approach to sustainability, please refer to our annually published Sustainability Report, which can be found at https://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/corporate-responsibility.
Sustainability Framework
In 2020, we launched a new sustainability framework and integrated strategy to guide our ongoing ESG work. Our sustainability framework is called 1x, 100x, 10,000x, and covers our direct impact and the impact of our value chain (customers and suppliers), as well as how we can advance sustainability on a global scale. Our 10-year sustainability strategy, which we introduced in 2020, considers the magnitude of our opportunities, including social and environmental impacts in our operations (1X), how we design solutions to address our industry’s impact, including that of our customers and suppliers (100X), and how our technology can be used in innovation to advance sustainability and equity on a global scale (10,000X).
Lead With Purpose Protect our Planet Innovate for Progress 1X FOR OUR BUSINESS 100X FOR THE INDUSTRY 10,000X FOR THE WORLD
Our Sustainability Commitments
We have announced sustainability commitments for the next decade that we believe will dramatically reduce our environmental impact. Although these goals are aggressive, we believe them to be achievable. We:
|
|
|
|
|
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | xi |
Proxy Statement Summary
Our Sustainability Strategy and Recent Initiatives
 | Lead with Purpose Leaning into our core values to make |  | Invest in People Cultivating a culture and talent engine | |||||
» Leading with purpose is about protecting our brand reputation, attracting the best talent, building operational efficiency and resiliency, and ensuring the long-term sustainability of our company and industry. » Our Standards of Business Conduct was refreshed for improved readability and comprehension, and has been released in 14 languages. » We have established regional compliance committees and conducted a company-wide, third-party administered Ethical Culture and Compliance Perceptions Assessment. » We completed 240 supply chain cybersecurity assessments and are monitoring approximately 2,500 suppliers for disruption » We successfully advocated for inclusion of an investment tax credit in the U.S. CHIPS and Science Act; Applied Chief Technology Officer Omkaram Nalamasu serves on the Industrial Advisory Committee of CHIPS for America. | » We value diversity of thought, race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, culture and expertise because they strengthen our business and power the innovations that define our enterprise. » Our commitment to invest in Applied’s people is underpinned by goals to increase women’s representation at Applied globally and in the U.S., increase underrepresented minorities’ representation in our U.S. workforce, and maintain ambitious occupational health and safety total case incident rates. » We have created a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) Engine, a framework of tools, training and processes to accelerate our Culture of Inclusion. » We achieved a 98% completion rate for training and learning hours by full-time employees, with a per-employee average of 57 training hours. » Our commitment to protecting human rights was furthered by our completion of a human rights salience assessment, including an implementation action plan, and we began building a Responsible Manufacturing Program to implement our Human Rights Statement of Principles and the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct. | |||||||
 | Protect our Planet Accelerate our transition to a low-carbon future powered by renewables |  | Innovate for Progress Advancing innovations that enable our | |||||
» With 99% of our greenhouse gas emissions stemming from our value chain, we designed a Net Zero 2040 Playbook to work collaboratively across our industry to reduce and mitigate our climate impact. » Our science-based Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions reduction targets received validation from the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). » Through a combination of onsite generation, virtual power purchase agreements, green utility programs and renewable energy credits, we have achieved 100% renewable electricity in the U.S. and 69% worldwide, through 2022. » We achieved a decrease in water intensity even as absolute water withdrawal increased due to business growth. | » From the earliest stages of design, we employ Design for Sustainability (DfSu) methods and principles—innovating systems that consume fewer resources, last longer, and support circularity. » Our commitment to innovate for progress is underpinned by our 3x30 goals pertaining to energy consumption, chemical consumption and footprint intensity for semiconductor products. » Our Supply Chain Certification for Environmental and Social Sustainability (SuCCESS2030) initiative offers training and resources to help our suppliers deliver on our sustainability expectations, and we conduct periodic supplier audits and assessments to verify their compliance. » Our supplier diversity program is one of the main pillars of our SuCCESS2030 initiative, and in 2022 | |||||||
| xii | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
Furthermore, we are committed Proxy Statement Summary
Our 2030 Sustainability Goals
Applied drives progress under our 1X/100X/10,000X framework in large part through setting and focusing on a series of 2030 environmental and social goals.
| »Greater than 25% women representation at Applied globally |
| »100% of electricity at Applied globally to come from renewable sources »50% reduction in Scope 1 and Scope 2 CO2e emissions (from 2019 baseline) »55% reduction of Scope 3 GHG emissions from use of sold products per $1 million of value added (gross profit) by 2030 (from 2019 baseline) | |||||
»Greater than 21% executive women representation at Applied globally, with an aspiration to achieve equal global and executive representation of women by 2040 | ||||||||
»Greater than 25% underrepresented minority representation in Applied’s U.S. workforce | ||||||||
»Greater than 10% executive underrepresented minority representation in Applied’s U.S. workforce |
| »Reduce equivalent energy consumption per wafer for semiconductor products by 30% by 2030 (from 2019 baseline) | |
»Reduce the impact from chemical consumption per wafer for semiconductor products by 20% by 2030 (from 2019 baseline) | ||
»30% reduction in the physical footprint of our semiconductor products (sqm/wph) (from 2019 baseline) | ||
»$1 billion spend with (and representation of) women- and minority-owned businesses by 2027 | ||
For more information on Applied’s recent progress toward meeting the goals underpinning our sustainability strategy, including our SuCCESS2030 roadmap and 3x30 product improvements, please refer to building a culture of inclusion for our employees with a focus on leadership, promoting diversity and inclusion, and eliminating systemic barriers to inclusion. In addition, we are providing ongoing career development for employees to encourage innovation and engagement.2022 Sustainability Report available at https://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/corporate-responsibility.
Our Fiscal 2021 ESG2023 Sustainability Accomplishments
To ensure thatbetter enable Applied is able to meet its ambitious long-term ESGsustainability goals, we established a set of interim objectives for fiscal 2021.2023. As described in more detail on page 34,42, the Company’s level of achievement of these objectives was added to the corporate scorecard, which informs bonus payouts for our executive officers. Overall,In 2023, Applied made substantialstrong progress in all of the framework areas.toward our 10-year sustainability roadmap. Key achievements included that we:
|
| |||||
| Continued to reduce our Scope 1 and 2 emissions, |
|
| |||
|
|
| Advanced our 3x30 and | |||
| Established a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Engine, a framework of tools, training and processes to empower employees at every level to accelerate our progress |
| Strengthened our Culture of Inclusion by continuing to provide comprehensive diversity training, including a month-long Culture of Inclusion Summit at 17 Applied sites globally | |||
| Working in partnership with third-party advisors, completed an |
| Followed or exceeded all regulatory requirements applicable to the health and safety performance of our operations, processes and products | |||
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | xiii |
Proxy Statement Summary
Sustainability Oversight and Corporate Social Responsibility GovernanceManagement
Our Board and management actively oversee sustainability matters to foster accountability. The Board’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (the “Governance Committee”) oversees the Company’s overall ESGsustainability strategy, policies and performance. We have established executive leadership of a company-wide strategy on ESGsustainability matters and reporting andreporting. We are focused on integrating sustainability into our operations and company culture through initiatives aligned to company strategy that address a broad set of stakeholders, including shareholders, customers, employees, suppliers, governments, and our local communities.
Our ESG Leadership Council, which includes leaders from across all of Applied’s sustainability-focused delivery teams, oversees implementation of our sustainability strategy. To ensure accountability, the Council regularly reports progress to Applied’s Executive Leadership Team as part of the strategic review process, and quarterly to the Governance Committee. The Council is also responsible for reviewing all content in our annual Sustainability Report. The Council is supported by employees and leaders from across all business units and functions that are responsible for delivering progress toward our sustainability strategy. Our Senior Director of ESG, Corporate Sustainability and Reporting leads ESGthe Council and sustainability efforts across our business and has primary responsibility for the quarterly written and in-personreports to the Governance Committee quarterly.and Executive Leadership Team. The Governance Committee’s sustainability oversight process also includes presentations by internal and third-party experts to discuss topics such as renewable energy, our Net Zero 2040 Playbook, the sustainability data assurance process, our 3x30 program and other relevant topics.
Our Environmental, Health and Safety & Sustainability (“EHSS”EHS”) organization is dedicated to maintaining a safe and healthful working environment, demonstrating environmental leadership, and meeting or exceeding regulatory compliance. The Head of EHSS also reports directly to the Governance Committee onreceives a quarterly basis. report on EHS matters, including an annual in-depth review of Applied’s EHS practices and policies.
We have a team fully dedicated to supporting our work in designing a cultureCulture of inclusion,Inclusion, and the HRCC oversees our corporate culture and human capital management programs, including our diversity and inclusion practices and initiatives. The HRCC approved ESGthe sustainability objectives for our annual bonus program to incentivize our leadership team to maintain progress toward all our 2030 ESGsustainability goals. Further details and data on our sustainability and corporate social responsibility practices and accomplishments are included in our annually published Sustainability Report, which can be found at https://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/corporate-responsibility.
Our Sustainability Vision and Strategy
|
| |
|
| |
| xiv |
PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
PROXY STATEMENT
PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nominees1 – Election of Directors
Proxy Statement
PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors
Nominees
Applied’s Board of Directors is elected each year at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Applied currently has ten directors. Upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board has nominated the ten individuals listed below for election at the Annual Meeting, each of whom currently serves as a director of Applied. These nominees bring a wide variety of relevant skills, professional experience and backgrounds, as well as diverse viewpoints and perspectives to represent the long-term interests of shareholders and to fulfill the leadership and oversight responsibilities of the Board.
If any nominee listed below becomes unable to stand for election at the Annual Meeting, the persons named as
proxies may vote for any person designated by the Board to replace the nominee. Alternatively, the proxies may vote for the remaining nominees and leave a vacancy that the Board may fill later, or the Board may reduce the authorized number of directors. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board is not aware of any nominee who is unable or will decline to serve as a director.
Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will serve until Applied’s 20232025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until they are succeeded by another qualified director who has been elected, or, if earlier, until their death, resignation, or removal.
 |
each of the following director nominees | |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 1 |
PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors
| Rani Borkar
Corporate Vice President, Azure Hardware Systems and Infrastructure, Microsoft Corporation |
Ms. Borkar brings extensive semiconductor industry experience to our Board
| ||||
| ||||||
Microsoft Corporation, Key skills and qualifications Industry and Technology: Ms. Borkar
Strategy and Innovation; Executive Leadership; Growth and Emerging Technologies; Global Business: Each role in Ms. Borkar’s career has featured increased responsibility and accountability for strategic planning and oversight in a broad range of global, high-growth businesses. As the head of Azure Hardware Systems and Infrastructure, she leads organizations that architect, invent, and sustain the silicon, platforms, and systems that power Azure. She is responsible for the vision, strategy, and architecture of silicon development as well as global capacity deployment for Microsoft’s cloud data center infrastructure. Ms. Borkar’s other relevant experience includes her role as Corporate Vice President at Intel, leading Intel’s silicon product development strategy while managing a large and diverse global engineering organization. Service, Operations and Manufacturing: Under Ms. Borkar’s leadership in her current role, Microsoft’s engineers focus on developing technologies to drive end-to-end business value for Azure’s products and solutions. Her experience with and understanding of service management and service offerings for technology companies, manufacturing operations and other operational processes provide important insights to our Board. | ||||||
INDEPENDENT Age: 62 Director Since: 2020 Board Committees • Human Resources and Compensation • Strategy and Investment Other Current Public Company Directorships • None Former Public Company Directorships (within last five years) • None Other Directorships and Memberships • Board member, Global Semiconductor Alliance | ||||||
| 2 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Applied Materials, Inc. PROPOSAL 1
– Election of Directors
| Judy Bruner
Executive Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer, SanDisk Corporation (retired) |
| ||||
| ||||||
| Administration and Chief Financial Officer of SanDisk Corporation, a supplier of flash storage products, a role she held from Key skills and qualifications Executive Leadership; Financial and Accounting; Strategy and Innovation; Global Business: Ms. Bruner’s career has been distinguished by roles of increasing responsibility in and oversight of financial management. These roles included serving as Chief Financial Officer at SanDisk Corporation and Palm, Inc. Ms. Bruner’s experience also included setting corporate strategy and diversifying businesses into new product areas that are less cyclical and less capital intensive, while focusing on the core business. Her prior roles in finance also included positions at 3Com, Ridge Computers and Hewlett-Packard. Industry and Technology: Ms. Bruner’s career has been centered in the technology sector, giving her particular insight into the challenges and opportunities of our sector and industry, as well as our end markets. Ms. Bruner’s extensive experience in the semiconductor industry at SanDisk provided an understanding of the capital intensity, business cycles, customers and engineering requirements of the semiconductor equipment business, which she brings to our Board. Risk Management; Cybersecurity: In Ms. Bruner’s role at SanDisk, she was responsible for the firm’s enterprise risk management and information technology, including cybersecurity. As a director, Ms. Bruner oversees enterprise risk management and cybersecurity at all the companies on which she currently serves as a board member, including at Rapid7, a security data and analytics solutions provider. She brings valuable insights from this experience to our Board to facilitate its oversight and considerations of | ||||||
INDEPENDENT Age: 65 Director Since: 2016 Board Committees • Audit (Chair) • Corporate Governance and Nominating (Chair) Other Current Public Company Directorships • Qorvo, Inc. • Rapid7, Inc. • Seagate Technology Former Public Company Directorships (within last five years) • Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | ||||||
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 3 |
PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors
| Xun (Eric) Chen
|
| ||||
| ||||||
| Investment Advisers Key skills and qualifications Industry and Technology; Strategy and Innovation; Growth and Emerging Technologies: Dr. Chen’s career has focused on the technology sector, and he provides his expertise on our industry, technologies and end markets in the boardroom. Dr. Chen is currently Executive Chairman of ParityBit, a technology company focused on leveraging the power of Big Data, AI technologies, and privacy computing. His other relevant experiences have included serving as a Executive Leadership; Global Business: The Board values Dr. Chen’s perspective gained through his various leadership roles at firms with global operations. For example, Dr. Chen is currently the Executive Chairman, and prior to joining SBIA was the CEO and Co-Founder, of | ||||||
INDEPENDENT Age: 54 Director Since: 2015 Board Committees • Human Resources and Compensation • Strategy and Investment Other Current Public Company Directorships • None Former Public Company Directorships (within last five years) • None | ||||||
PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors
| Aart J. de Geus
Chair of the Board of Directors, Synopsys, Inc. |
| ||||
| ||||||
| the leading provider of electronic design automation software, design IP and related services for semiconductor design Key skills and qualifications Industry and Technology; Executive Leadership; Strategy and Innovation; Global Business; Risk Management: As the leading founder of Synopsys, Dr. de Geus has grown Synopsys for over three and a half decades and has held senior roles in engineering and marketing before becoming Chief Executive Officer and subsequently Executive Chair of the Board. He has been involved in all aspects of executive leadership at Synopsys, including determining corporate strategy, overseeing enterprise risk management, closing well over a hundred strategic acquisitions and transactions, and expanding the operations globally. Synopsys now has offices and development centers in North America, Europe, Armenia, Israel, India, Japan, Vietnam, South Korea and China. Growth and Emerging Technologies; Government Policy and Sustainability: Dr. de Geus has expanded Synopsys from a start-up synthesis company to a global high-tech leader in electronic design automation. He has long been considered one of the world’s leading experts on logic synthesis and simulation, frequently keynotes major conferences, is a member of the National Academy of Engineering and the recipient of numerous awards including the IEEE Robert N. Noyce Medal, the Global Semiconductor Alliance Dr. Morris Chang Exemplary Leadership Award, and the Silicon Valley Leadership Group Lifetime Achievement Award. As a longtime CEO, Dr. de Geus has experience in government policy, such as the CHIPS Act and evolving international export controls, as well as driving sustainability initiatives in the context of regulatory requirements and stakeholder input. | ||||||
INDEPENDENT Age: 69 Director Since: 2007 Board Committees: • Strategy and Investment Other Current Public Company Directorships: • Synopsys, Inc. Former Public Company Directorships (within last five years): • None Other Directorships and Memberships • Executive Board Member and Past Chairman, Silicon Valley Leadership Group • Board Member, Global Semiconductor Alliance • Governing Council Member, Electronic System Design Alliance | ||||||
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 5 |
PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors
| Gary E. Dickerson
President and Chief Executive Officer, Applied Materials, Inc. |
| ||
| ||||
| of the Board of Directors Key skills and qualifications Industry and Technology; Executive Leadership; Strategy and Innovation; Global Business; Risk Management: Mr. Dickerson has over three decades of experience in executive-level positions at large multi-national companies in the semiconductor and technology industries, including nearly two decades as a chief executive officer at Varian and Applied. Mr. Dickerson’s knowledge of our industry, technologies and end markets provides important insight and leadership to the oversight, planning and execution of our business strategy and operations. At Applied, this has resulted in the company being the world’s leading semiconductor and display equipment company with over $26 billion in annual revenues and operations in 150 cities in 24 countries. Growth and Emerging Technologies; Service, Sales and Operations; Government Policy and Sustainability: Throughout Mr. Dickerson’s career, he has held roles responsible for identifying and developing emerging technologies and service offerings for the semiconductor industry. This includes his first roles in manufacturing and engineering management with General Motors’ Delco Electronics Division and AT&T Technologies, 18 years at KLA-Tencor, progressing from roles in product development and general management of products, sales and services business units to his appointment as President and Chief Operating Officer, and to his leadership and contributions as Chief Executive Officer at Varian and Applied. Mr. Dickerson has government policy experience in guiding Applied through the geopolitical and regulatory environment, as well as from his service as a board of member of the U.S.-China Business Council. Mr. Dickerson’s experience in sustainability stems from his deep involvement in developing Applied’s sustainability roadmap and championing its sustainability initiatives. Mr. Dickerson draws on these experiences to provide leadership and insight in guiding our core semiconductor business, and as we develop new technologies and services to enable significant value creation for our customers and Applied. | ||||
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Age: 66 Director Since: 2013 Board Committees • None Other Current Public Company Directorships • None Former Public Company Directorships (within last five years) • None Other Directorships and Memberships • Board Member, U.S. – China Business Council | ||||
| 6 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors
| Thomas J. Iannotti
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Enterprise Services, Hewlett-Packard Company (retired)
| Mr. Iannotti serves as the Chairman of the Board
| ||||
| ||||||
| and General Manager, Enterprise Services, for Hewlett-Packard Company, a technology solutions provider to consumers, businesses, and institutions globally, from Key skills and qualifications Industry and Technology; Executive Leadership; Strategy and Innovation; Global Business: Mr. Iannotti Service, Operations and Manufacturing; Risk Management: While at Hewlett-Packard, Mr. Iannotti was integral in setting and executing operational and service strategies for the Enterprise Services group, which supported and provided services and products for all of the company’s offerings. Mr. Iannotti’s roles also involved oversight and management of risk, and he has served as | ||||||
Chairman of the Board INDEPENDENT Age: 67 Director Since: 2005 Board Committees • Human Resources and Compensation (Chair) Other Current Public Company Directorships • Rigetti Computing, Inc. Former Public Company Directorships (within last five years) •Atento S.A. | ||||||
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 7 |
PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors
| Alexander A. Karsner
Senior Strategist, X (parent company: Alphabet Inc.) |
| ||
| ||||
Key skills and qualifications Executive Leadership; Global Business: Mr. Karsner has Industry and Technology; Growth and Emerging Technologies; Strategy and Innovation: Mr. Karsner currently serves as Government Policy and Sustainability: Mr. Karsner has extensive experience in government policy and relations, and offers our Board valuable insight into the regulatory environment. From | ||||
INDEPENDENT Age: 56 Director Since: 2008 Board Committees • Corporate Governance and Nominating • Human Resources and Compensation Other Current Public Company Directorships • Exxon Mobil Corporation Former Public Company Directorships (within last five years) • Broadscale Acquisition Corp. | ||||
Other Directorships and Memberships • Board Member of Conservation International • Advisory Board Member of: Energy Futures Initiative; Precourt Institute for Energy, Stanford University; MIT Media Lab | ||||
PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors
 |
|
Mr. March brings deep semiconductor industry experience, strong financial expertise, and executive leadership to our Board. Mr. March joined Texas Instruments Incorporated, a global semiconductor company, in 1984 and built a career of varying positions of increasing responsibility over his 33-year tenure at the company. He was appointed Controller in 2002 and was named Chief Financial Officer in 2003.
| ||
| ||||
INDEPENDENT Age: 66 Director Since: 2022 Board Committees: • Audit Other Current Public Company Directorships • None Former Public Company Directorships (within last five years) • None | ||||
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 9 |
PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors
| Yvonne McGill
|
| ||||
| ||||||
Ms. McGill has extensive executive leadership experience and Key skills and qualifications Executive Leadership; Financial and Accounting; Strategy and Innovation; Risk Management: Since joining Dell in 1997, Ms. McGill has served in various finance leadership roles, including her current role as Chief Financial Officer. At Dell, Ms. McGill oversees all aspects of the company’s finance function, including accounting, financial planning and analysis, tax, treasury and investor relations, as well as corporate development, global business operations and Dell financial services. She also partners closely with the office of Dell’s CEO to develop and execute a long-term strategy that creates value for Dell’s stakeholders. Prior to Dell, Ms. McGill worked at ManTech International Corporation and Price Waterhouse. Ms. McGill is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive). Industry and Technology; Global Business: During her over 26-year career at Dell, Ms. McGill has gained experience across the company’s comprehensive portfolio of IT hardware, software and service solutions spanning both traditional infrastructure and emerging, multi-cloud technologies. Ms. | ||||||
INDEPENDENT Age: 56 Director Since: 2019 Board Committees: • Audit • Corporate Governance and Nominating Other Current Public Company Directorships • None Former Public Company Directorships (within last five years) • None | ||||||
| 10 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors
| Scott A. McGregor
President and Chief Executive Officer, Broadcom Corporation (retired) |
Mr. McGregor brings to our Board
| ||||
| ||||||
| Executive Officer and as a member of the board of directors of Broadcom Corporation, a world leader in wireless connectivity, broadband Key skills and qualifications Industry and Technology; Executive Leadership; Global Business: Mr. McGregor Growth and Emerging Technologies; Strategy and Innovation: Throughout his career, Mr. McGregor held strategic roles developing new technologies and growing businesses in new directions. Mr. McGregor started his career at Xerox PARC working on user interface design for the world’s first personal computers. He then joined Microsoft and led the team that created the first version of Microsoft Windows. After pivoting to the semiconductor industry, Mr. McGregor continued to lead through technological innovation at both Broadcom and Philips, expanding each company’s footprint and offerings. At Broadcom, Mr. McGregor led revenue growth from $2.4 billion to over $8 billion during his tenure as CEO. Financial and Accounting; Cybersecurity; Risk Management: As CEO of Broadcom and Philips for approximately 15 years, Mr. McGregor had oversight responsibility for financing activities, risk management and cybersecurity at large companies within the semiconductor industry. As a result of these experiences, as well as oversight of cybersecurity as a board member | ||||||
INDEPENDENT Age: 67 Director Since: 2018 Board Committees: • Audit • Strategy and Investment (Chair) Other Current Public Company Directorships • Equifax, Inc. Former Public Company Directorships (within last five years) • Luminar Technologies, | ||||||
| Inc. | ||||||
Chairman Emeritus
Chairman Emeritus
James C. Morgan became Chairman Emeritus in March 2009, following his retirement as our director and Chairman of the Board. Mr. Morgan spent more than 31 years as a director and employee of Applied, including over 20 years as Chairman of the Board.
Mr. Morgan first joined Applied in 1976 and served as Chief Executive Officer from 1977 to 2003. As Chairman Emeritus, Mr. Morgan does not attend any Board or Committee meetings, has no voting rights and receives no retainer or meeting fees.
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 11 |
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES Board and Corporate Governance Practices
Board and Corporate Governance Practices
Board Composition and Nominee Considerations
The Board values having directors who possess a wide variety of relevant skills, professional experience and backgrounds, bring diverse viewpoints and perspectives, and effectively represent the long-term interests of shareholders.
Listed below are certain of the key skills and experience that the Board considers important for our directors to have in light of our current business in order to contribute to the effective leadership and exercise of oversight responsibilities by the Board.
| Industry and Technology | Experience with and knowledge of our industry and technologies, as well as our end markets, facilitate a deeper understanding within the Board of our equipment and service products and the markets in which we compete. | ||
| Executive Leadership | Experience in executive-level positions at large multi-national companies, including public company board experience, contribute practical insight into our business strategy and operations. | ||
| Growth and Emerging Technologies | Experience identifying and developing emerging technologies are important to our growth strategies and provide important insights as we develop new technologies and our business grows into new areas. | ||
| Global Business | Experience in a leadership role at an organization with substantial global operations can provide valuable business and cultural perspectives. | ||
| Financial and Accounting | Experience with financial markets, financing operations, and accounting and financial reporting processes provide important oversight of our capital structure, financing activities, and financial reporting and internal controls. | ||
| Service, Operations and Manufacturing | Experience with and understanding of service management and service offerings for technology companies, manufacturing operations and other operational processes contributes to understanding our business and also can provide important insights on the operations of our customers. | ||
| Strategy and Innovation | Experience in setting and executing corporate strategy and with strategic transactions is important to the successful planning and execution of our long-term vision. | ||
| Cybersecurity | Experience managing cybersecurity, information and data security risks or cybersecurity threats can provide important input to the Board in its oversight of the | ||
| Risk Management | Experience overseeing enterprise risk management or business continuity planning in a large organization, or other experience in managing risk at the enterprise level or in a senior compliance or regulatory role, provide important input to the Board in its oversight of the Company’s enterprise risk management program. | ||
| Government Policy and Sustainability | Experience working with government policy offers us insight into the regulatory environment in which we operate and experience with sustainability initiatives contributes to the Board’s oversight of our | ||
| 12 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Board Matrix.and Corporate Governance Practices
Board Matrix
The matrix below summarizes certain of the key experiences, qualifications, skills and attributes that our director nominees bring to the Board to enable effective oversight. This matrix is intended to provide a summary of our director nominees’ qualifications and is not a complete list of each director nominee’s strengths or contributions to the Board. Additional details on each director nominee’s experiences, qualifications, skills and attributes are set forth in their biographies.
| Skills and Experience |
Borkar |
Bruner |
Chen |
De Geus |
Dickerson |
Iannotti |
Karsner |
Ma |
McGill |
McGregor |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industry and Technology | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Leadership | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Growth and Emerging Technologies | ● |
| ● | ● | ● |
| ● | ● |
| ● |
| ● |
| ● | ● | ● |
| ● |
|
| ● | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Global Business | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial and Accounting |
| ● |
|
|
|
|
| ● | ● | ● |
|
| ● |
|
|
|
|
| ● | ● | ● | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service, Operations and Manufacturing | ● |
|
|
| ● | ● |
|
|
|
|
| ● |
|
|
| ● | ● |
| ● |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strategy and Innovation | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cybersecurity |
| ● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ● |
|
| ● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ● | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk Management |
| ● |
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
|
| ● |
| ● | ● | ● |
| ● | ● | ● | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Government Policy and Sustainability |
|
|
|
|
|
| ● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ● | ● |
| ● |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenure and Independence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tenure and Independence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenure (years) | 1 | 5 | 6 | 14 | 8 | 16 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| 3 | 7 | 8 | 16 | 10 | 18 | 15 | 2 | 4 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Independence | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| ● | ● | ● | ● |
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demographics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Age | 60 | 63 | 52 | 67 | 64 | 65 | 54 | 48 | 54 | 65 |
| 62 | 65 | 54 | 69 | 66 | 67 | 56 | 66 | 56 | 67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gender Identity | F | F | M | M | M | M | M | F | F | M |
| F | F | M | M | M | M | M | M | F | M | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
African American or Black |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alaskan Native or Native American |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asian | ● |
| ● |
|
|
|
| ● |
|
|
| ● |
| ● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hispanic or Latinx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
White |
| ● |
| ● | ● | ● | ● |
| ● | ● |
|
| ● |
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LGBTQ+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 13 |
Board and Corporate Governance Practices
Diversity. Our Board values having a Board that reflects diverse perspectives, including those based on gender, ethnicity, skills, experience at policy-making levels in areas that are relevant to the Company’s global activities, and functional, geographic or cultural backgrounds. Our Board has adopted a Policy on Board Diversity within our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which reflects the Board’s commitment to actively seek out women and ethnically diverse director candidates and to consider the factors above, among others, in the context of the current composition of the Board and needs of the Company, when identifying and evaluating director candidates.
The ten director nominees for election at our 20222024 Annual Meeting bring to our Board a variety of different backgrounds,
skills, professional and industry experience, and other attributes and perspectives that contribute to the overall diversity of our Board.
Independence. The Board’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee expects each non-employee director to be free of relationships, interests or affiliations that could give rise to conflicts of interest or interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment. Applied’s Corporate Governance Guidelines require that a majority of our directors must be independent, and that our Audit, Human Resources and Compensation,HRCC and Governance Committees must consist solely of independent directors. Director independence is determined under Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules. The Board has affirmatively determined that,
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
other than Mr. Dickerson, our Chief Executive Officer, all members of the Board who served during 20212023 and all director nominees are independent under applicable Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules.
Tenure. The Board believes that new ideas and perspectives are critical to a forward-looking and strategic Board, as are the valuable experiences and deep understanding of Applied’s business and industries that longer-serving directors offer. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines do not impose a term limit on Board service, but our directors are not typically nominated for re-election after they reach the age of 70.72. Feedback from the annual Board evaluations and discussions regarding individual discussionsperformance between each non-employee director and our Chair are an important determinantconsiderations of Boarddirector tenure. As a result of our ongoing Board refreshment efforts, we have added twothree new directors to the Board over the last threefive years, which has resulted in a balanced range of tenures, ensuring both continuity and fresh perspectives among our director nominees. Our nominees have an average tenure of slightly less than eight years, which matches the average tenure for independent directors of other S&P 500 companies.nine years.
Key Attributes of the Board
Independence 9 of 10 directors are independent Diversity 50% of the Board is ethnically and/or gender diverse 40% are female 30% are ethnically diverse1 Tenure 2 directors added to the Board over last 3 years Regular refreshment resulting in average director tenure of less than 8 years > 10 years 4-10 years < 4 years 3 directors 4 directors 3 directors 1 -* Ethnically diverse means a director who self-identifies as one or more of the following (defined by Nasdaq as an Underrepresented Minority): Black or African American or Black, Alaskan Native or Native American, Asian, Hispanic or Latinx, Asian, Native American or Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian or Pacific IslanderIslander.
| 14 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Board and Corporate Governance Practices
Board Composition and Refreshment
Identification of New Director Candidates. Identifying and recommending individuals for nomination and election to our Board is a principal responsibility of our Governance Committee, which performs this function through an ongoing year-round process.
The Governance Committee regularly considers the size and composition of the Board and assesses whether the
composition appropriately aligns with the Company’s evolving business and strategic needs. The focus is on ensuring that the Board is composed of directors who possess a wide variety of relevant skills, professional experience and backgrounds, bring diverse viewpoints and perspectives, and effectively represent the long-term interests of shareholders. In accordance with the Policy on Board Diversity, including our commitment to having a Board that reflects diverse perspectives, the Governance Committee actively seeks out women and ethnically diverse director candidates, as well as candidates diverse in skills, experience at policy-making levels in areas that are relevant to our global activities, and functional, geographic or cultural background.
In its consideration of potential director candidates, the Governance Committee reviews the short-term and long-term strategies and interests of the Company to determine what current and future skills and experiences are required of the Board in exercising its oversight function. Specific search criteria evolve over time to reflect the Company’s dynamic business and strategic needs and the changing composition of the Board, and may include factors such factors as:
Operating experience or thought leadership in key markets, industries, technologies, or business models that are aligned with the Company’s strategic growth plans; |
Business or cultural background in regions where the Company does significant business; |
Senior executive leadership and management experience; and |
Subject matter expertise in such areas as corporate finance and financial reporting, governance, compensation, risk management and |
The Governance Committee also considers succession planning in light of anticipated retirements, and for Board and Committee Chair roles, to maintain relevant expertise and depth of experience.
In addition, all director candidates are also expected to possess or demonstrate:
Sound judgment, analytical and inquisitive perspective, and practical wisdom; |
Strategic mindset and an engaged and collaborative approach; |
Independence, personal and professional ethics, integrity and values; and |
Commitment to representing the long-term interests of Applied’s shareholders. |
The Governance Committee may retain a search firm to assist in identifying and evaluating new candidates for director nominees and may also consider referrals from directors, shareholders, or other sources. The Governance Committee evaluates and interviews potential Board candidates and makes appointment recommendations to the full Board. All members of the Board may interview candidates.
Board and Corporate Governance Practices
Regular Review of Board Composition Drives Refreshment
Assess Develop a search profile of relevant skills, background and experience sought in new directors Identify Information provided to third-party search firms Potential candidates identified by independent directors, shareholders, independent search firm, our people Evaluate Governance Committee screens candidates for qualifications, skills, diversity, independence and potential conflicts Candidates meet with directors Recommend Governance Committee recommends selected candidates to the Board Results Two new directors over the last three years
Recent Board Refreshment. As a result of the foregoing process, the Board has added twothree new directors over the last threefive years, each of whom has brought valuable and diverse backgrounds and perspectives to the Board. The most recent appointment wastwo appointments were Mr. March in 2022 and Ms. Borkar in December 2020, who is Corporate Vice President, Azure Hardware Systems2020. Mr. March brings decades of finance and Infrastructure at Microsoft. In this role, she leads the core organizations building Microsoft’s cloud computing platform, including silicon, systems,business operations expertise and supply chain. Ms. Borkar has extensivestrong semiconductor industry experience in semiconductor design, having served in engineering and executive roles at IBM Corporation and
Intel Corporation.to our Board. Ms. Borkar brings to our Board experience in the semiconductor industry, chip design and cloud computing, as well as leadership and management experience.
Re-nomination of Directors for Election at Annual Meeting. In considering whether to recommend re-nomination of a director for election at our Annual Meeting, the Governance Committee considers factors such as:
The extent to which the director’s skills, qualifications and experience continue to contribute to the success of our Board, taking into account current core competencies of the Board, and the mix of desired skills and |
Feedback from the annual Board evaluations and individual discussions between each director and our Chair; |
Attendance and participation at, and preparation for, Board and Committee meetings; |
Shareholder feedback, including the support received by director nominees elected at our |
Outside board, employment and other affiliations, including any actual or perceived conflicts of interest; and |
Considerations under the Board’s Policy on Board Diversity and the extent to which the director continues to contribute to the diversity of our Board. |
Based on the Governance Committee’s recommendation, the Board selects director nominees and recommends them for election by Applied’s shareholders.
| 16 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Board and Corporate Governance Practices
Shareholder Recommendations or Nominations. The evaluation procedures described above apply to all candidates for director nomination, including candidates submitted by shareholders. Shareholders wishing to recommend a candidate for consideration by the Governance Committee should submit the candidate’s name, biographical data and a description of their qualifications in light of the criteria listed above to Teri A. Little, Corporate Secretary, Applied Materials, Inc., 3225 Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1268, P.O. Box 58039, Santa Clara, CA 95052, or by e-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com.
Shareholders wishing to nominate a director should follow the specific procedures set forth in our Bylaws.
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Applied’s Corporate Governance Guidelines establish the governance framework within which the Board conducts its business and fulfills its responsibilities. These guidelines and other important governance materials are available on our website at: http:https://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/investor-relations/governance-documents.us/en/about/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-documents.html. The Board regularly reviews our Corporate Governance Guidelines in light of legal and regulatory requirements, evolving best practices and other developments.
Our corporate governance framework provides the Board flexibility to determine the appropriate leadership structure for the Company and whether the roles of Chair and CEO should be separated or combined. In making this determination, the Board considers many factors, including the needs of the business, the Board’s assessment of its leadership needs from time to time, and the best interests of shareholders. If the role of Chair is filled by a director who does not qualify as an independent director, the independent directors will designate a Lead Independent Director. As discussed below, our Chair is currently an independent director. However, if Applied were to designate a Lead Independent Director in the future, our Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth the roles and authority such individual would have, including, among other things, presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the Chair is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors, having the authority to call meetings of the independent directors, and serving as a liaison for consultation and direct communication with shareholders.
The Board believes that it is currently appropriate to separate the roles of Chair and CEO. The CEO is responsible for setting our strategic direction and the day-to-day leadership of our business, while the Chair, along with the rest of our independent directors, ensures that the Board’s time and attention are focused on effective oversight of the matters most critical to Applied. Mr. Iannotti, an independent director, currently serves as the Chair of the Board. Mr. Iannotti has significant experience and knowledge of Applied, including having worked with two CEOs and different management teams at Applied, and the Board believes that his deep knowledge of the Company and industry, as well as his strong leadership and governance experience, enableenables him to lead the Board effectively and independently.
As the independent Board Chair, Mr. Iannotti’s roles include:
| » | Presiding at all meetings of the Board, including executive sessions of the independent directors |
| » | Having the authority to call meetings of the Board and of the independent directors |
| » | Serving as a liaison between the CEO and the independent directors |
| » | Approving information sent to the Board and advising management on the Board’s information needs |
| » | Approving meeting agendas and meeting schedules |
| » | Having the authority to retain outside advisors and consultants who report directly to the Board |
| » | Presiding at all meetings of shareholders |
| » | Serving as a liaison for direct communication with shareholders |
| » | Providing direct guidance to the CEO, including advising on executing the Company’s long-term strategy |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 17 |
Board and Corporate Governance Practices
| » | Leading, along with the members of the HRCC and the other independent directors, the annual performance review of the CEO |
| » | In conjunction with the relevant committees of the Board, reviewing and assessing director performance and compensation, and the size and composition of the Board |
The Chairs of all the Board’s Committees – Audit, Governance, HRCC and Strategy and Investment – are also independent directors.
Director Onboarding and Education
When new directors join our Board, they participate in a comprehensive onboarding program to learn about our industry, business, strategies and policies. The multi-day onboarding program includes meetings with senior executives to discuss our businesses, strategy and operations, and our corporate functions, such as finance, technology, information systems and legal, and a tour of the Maydan Technology Center, our state-of-the-art R&D facility. New directors also meet with the executives and staff supporting the Committees on which they sit, as well as the Committees’ external consultants and advisors. Each new director is also partnered
with an experienced fellow director “mentor” to facilitate the integration of the new director to the Board.
For continued education regarding our business and industry, we provide presentations by internal and external experts during Board meetings on topics such as technology inflections, industry trends, changes in the geopolitical and macroeconomic landscape, and the ESGsustainability landscape, with particular focus on the implications and impact to the Company. Our Board and Committees also regularly review developments in corporate governance to continue enhancing the Board’s effectiveness. We encourage directors to participate in external continuing director education programs and provide reimbursement for expenses associated with this participation. Throughout the year, Board members also visit our manufacturing facilities and attend Company events, including Analyst Day, our Engineering and Technology (ET) Conference and Diversity Day.the announcement of our investment to build the Equipment and Process Innovation and Commercialization (EPIC) Center, an advanced facility for collaborative semiconductor process technology and manufacturing equipment R&D. These interactions, along with meetings with leaders below the CEO Executive StaffLeadership Team level throughout the year, giveprovide directors additional visibility to provide oversight of the Company’s culture, strategies and operations.
Board and Committee Evaluations
Our Board recognizes that a thorough, constructive evaluation process enhances our Board’s effectiveness and is an essential element of good corporate governance. Each year, the Governance Committee, in consultation with our independent Board Chair, reviews and determines the design, scope, content and execution of the evaluation process, including whether to modify the written evaluation questionnaire or to engage a third party to facilitate the evaluation.
TheIn 2023, the Governance Committee reviewed the evaluation process consiststhat had been in place for a number of years and considered the input of Board members on the evaluation process. Based on this review, the Governance Committee determined to make enhancements to the process to include more focused questions to invite open-ended responses, rather than numerical ratings, on each director’s assessments of the Board, each standing committee of the Board Committees and individual directors. Written questionnaires were used in the evaluation to solicit feedback on a range of issues,topics, including overall Board effectiveness; Board dynamics and communication; interaction with management; Board skills and experience; the role of the Board and Committee structure and composition; meeting process and dynamics; execution of key responsibilities; interaction with management;chairs; and information and resources.
| 18 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Board and Corporate Governance Practices
Following completion of the written questionnaires, aggregated results, including all written comments together with data analyzing results compared to the prior year, arewere provided to the Chair, who meetsmet with each director individually to discuss additional input on these topics and to provide individual feedback. Directors were also invited to provide feedback on our Board Chair to the Chair of the Governance Committee. Committee chairs leadled a discussion of evaluation results for their respective Committees and a summary of Board and Committee evaluation results iswas discussed with the full Board, including suggestions for updating policies and practices per evaluation results. Director suggestions for improvements to the evaluation questionnaires and process are considered for incorporation for the following year.
2023 Board Evaluation Process
2021 Board Evaluation Process
Questionnaire One-on-One Discussions Board Report Closed Session Evaluation questionnaire provides director feedback on an anonymized basis Non-anonymized questionnaires provided to Chair to facilitate candid, one-on-one discussions with each director, where the Chair solicits additional feedback and provides individual feedback Board and Committee evaluation results provided to the full Board Closed session discussion of Board and Committee evaluations led by our Chair and independent Committee chairs Policies and practices are updated as appropriate per evaluation results and discussionsCorporate Governance Practices
Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
One of the Board’s most important functions is overseeing risk management for the Company. While Applied’s management team is responsible for the day-to-day management of risk, the Board is responsible for ensuring that the risk-management processes designed and implemented by management are functioning as intended. Applied’s risk oversight framework illustrated below shows the close interaction between the full Board, individual committees and senior management.
Applieds management has day-to-day responsibility for: Identifying risks and assessing them in relation to Company strategies and objectives; Implementing suitable risk mitigation plans, processes and controls; and Appropriately managing risks in a manner that serves the best interests of Applied, its shareholders and other stakeholders Management regularly reports to the Board on its risk assessments and risk mitigation strategies for the major risks of our business. Senior management and other employees also report to the Board and its committees from time to time on risk-related issues The Board The Board has the ultimate responsibility for, and is actively engaged in, oversight of the Companys risk management, in some cases directly by the full Board, and in some cases through delegation of certain types of risks to the oversight of the appropriate Board Committee COMMITTEES
Applied has implemented an enterprise risk management (“ERM”) program, overseen by the Audit Committee, which provides an enterprise-wide perspective on Applied’s risks. The Board has established a management committee to oversee and monitor the ERM program. This ERM Committee, comprising members of Applied’s senior management, is led by our CFO and Chief Legal Officer, with representatives from the Company’s largest business segment and supply chain operations.
| 20 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Board and Corporate Governance Practices
The risks identified by the ERM program are reported to the Board, with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company, including strategic, operational, financial, and legal and compliance risks. Oversight responsibility for a particular risk may fall
within an area of responsibility and expertise of one of the Board Committees. Management reviews the ERM program activities regularly with the Audit Committee, presents an analysisregular analyses of risk mitigation strategies to the Board or the respective Committee with oversight responsibility for the risk,relevant risk. The ERM Committee reports to the Audit Committee at least semi-annually and provides a broader annual risk mitigation updatesupdate to the full Board.
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
Risk Assessment of Compensation Programs. We have assessed our compensation policies, plans and practices, and determined that they do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Applied. To make this determination, our management reviewed Applied’s compensation policies, plans and practices, and assessed the following aspects: design, payment methodology, potential payment volatility, relationship to our financial results, length of performance period, risk-mitigating features, performance measures and goals, oversight and controls, and plan features and values compared to market practices. Management reviewed its analysis with the Human Resources and Compensation Committee,HRCC, which agreed with this determination. Applied also has in place various controls to mitigate risks relating to compensation policies, plans and practices, such as executive stock ownership guidelines and a clawback policy that enables the recovery of certain incentive compensation payments in certain circumstances.
Board’s Role in Oversight of Strategy
The Board and its Committees actively engage with management to provide guidance on and oversight of Applied’s business strategy throughout the year. The Board dedicates one meeting annually to focus on Applied’s long-term strategy, which include strategic plans from members of senior management on the priorities and implementation strategies for their respective lines of business. These strategic plans guide Applied’s actions to manage risk and deliver shareholder value. The Board’s expanded strategy sessions also include presentations by internal experts to discuss technologies and markets relevant to our core businesses as well as adjacent and emerging technologies. In addition, various elements of strategy are discussed at every Board meeting, as well as at many meetings of the Board’s Committees, including the Strategy and Investment Committee. In order to assess performance against our strategic plans, the Board receives regular updates on progress and execution, and provides direction to senior management throughout the year.
To enhance its oversight of Applied’s strategy and process for considering long-term trends within the Company’s industries, the Board also leverages Applied’s Growth Technical Advisory Board, which is composed of leading academic and industry luminaries with a diverse set of backgrounds in fields such as science, technology, government and education. This Advisory Board, which includes a former member of the Applied Board, provides Applied and the Board with additional, independent insights on how major industries will continue to evolve in a technology-centric world.
Management Succession Planning
The Board and the HRCC recognize that developing the capabilities of Applied’s executives is vital to our ability to capitalize on our opportunities and increase long-term shareholder value. Accordingly, the HRCC’s most important goal is to oversee the Company’s programs that foster executive capability and retention, with emphasis on leadership development, management capabilities and succession plans.
We build our leadership capability using a multi-step approach to succession planning for our most critical roles, including CEO, executive and technology leadership positions. Our executive succession planning process is a carefully designed, thoughtful and long-term approach overseen by the HRCC and the Board. With the guidance of the HRCC, the Board also maintains a CEO emergency succession plan. We plan, and prepare as many years in advance as possible, for anticipated transitions to ensure leadership continuity and positive outcomes for the Company. Another key component of succession planning is leadership assessment and development of potential successors, including moving leaders into new, increasingly complex roles that complement their professional development. In addition, diversity of our succession pipelines is a priority of our Board and the Company, and we strive to ensure a diverse succession slate.
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 21 |
Board and Corporate Governance Practices
Management updatesreports quarterly either to the HRCC on executive leadership developments quarterly and reports toor the full Board on executive leadership development and succession planning annually.planning. The HRCC regularly discusses and reports to the Board with respect toinclude updates regarding succession and development programs for the CEO and other senior executives, with an eye toward ensuring development of the talent needed to lead Applied today and in the future and readiness of succession candidates who can assume top management positions without undue interruption. Board members have opportunities throughout the year to engage
with members of senior management and other high-potential leaders in a variety of formal and informal settings, including Board meetings and events, preparatory meetings, analyst meetings, and internal and external business and technology conferences. The HRCC and Board also regularly discuss individual executive transitions as the need arisesneeded over the course of the year. The Board’s goal is to have a long-term and continuing process for effective senior leadership capability, development and succession, and to ensure that there are readily available choices when the time is right.need arises.
In addition to direct engagement through our recurring shareholder engagement program discussed below, we have instituted a number of mechanisms that allow shareholders to advance their points of view, including:
Right to Call a Special Meeting. Our Bylaws permit shareholders holding at least 20%10% of our outstanding shares of common stock to call a special meeting. Our Board approved an amendment and restatement of our Bylaws to lower the threshold from 20% to 10% in response to majority support of a shareholder proposal on this topic at our 2023 annual meeting and subsequent feedback we received during our shareholder outreach, as discussed further below under “Shareholder Engagement.”
Right to Act by Written Consent. Our Certificate of Incorporation permits shareholders holding at least 20% of our outstanding shares of common stock to initiate the process for shareholders to take action by written consent without a meeting.
Proxy Access. Our Bylaws permit proxy access. Any shareholder (or group of up to 20 shareholders) owning 3% or more of Applied’s common stock continuously for at least three years may nominate up to two individuals or 20% of our Board, whichever is greater, as director candidates for election to the Board, and require us to include such nominees in our annual meeting proxy statement.
Majority Voting. Under our Bylaws, in any uncontested election of directors (an election in which the number of nominees does not exceed the number of directors to be elected), any nominee who receives a greater number of votes cast “for” their election than votes cast “against” their election will be elected.
Our Bylaws provide that in the event an incumbent director receives more “against” than “for” votes, they shall tender their resignation after certification of the shareholder vote. Our Governance Committee, composed entirely of independent directors, will consider the offer of resignation, taking into consideration all factors it deems relevant, and recommend to the Board the action to be taken. The Board must take action on the recommendation within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote. No director who tenders an offer of resignation may participate in the vote on the Governance Committee’s recommendation or the Board’s determination of whether to accept the resignation offer. Applied will publicly disclose the Board’s decision, including, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting an offer to resign.
We believe that strong corporate governance should include regular engagement with our shareholders to enable us to understand and respond to shareholder concerns.
Investor Relations. Our senior management team, including our CEO, CFO and members of our Investor Relations team, maintain regular contact with a broad base of investors, including through quarterly earnings calls, individual meetings and other channels for communication, to understand their concerns. In 2021,2023, senior management
participated in 100103 meetings with investors, including 9491 meetings with our CFO and 2415 with our CEO.
Shareholder Outreach Program. In addition, we have a robust shareholder outreach program, which is a recurring, year-round effort, led by a cross-functional team that includes members of our Investor Relations, Global Rewards, ESG and Legal functions, with participation of our independent directors, where appropriate. This engagement enables us to build meaningful relationships over time with our shareholders. The Board’s Governance Committee oversees our shareholder engagement program.
| 22 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
FEBRUARY - MARCH Ahead of annual meeting, conduct engagement with investors that have expressed any concerns or questions over ballot items Board and proxy statement DECEMBER - JANUARY Continue to meet with shareholders and proxy advisors, enhance proxy statement and annual report content based on feedback, and respond to shareholder concerns APRIL - AUGUST Review and summarize feedback from annual meeting, identify potential areas of concern, track governance trends, and finalize Sustainability Report SEPTEMBER - NOVEMBER Conduct general off-season engagement outreach with shareholders and proxy advisors Year-Round EngagementCorporate Governance Practices
We engage with a significant cross-section of our shareholder base, including large institutional investors, pension funds and other investors. Topics of discussion include key business, Board, governance, executive compensation, environmental, sustainability and diversity and inclusion matters, as well as other subjects of interest to our shareholders. Feedback received by the Company during these engagements is shared with the Governance Committee, other relevant Committees, the full Board, and relevant members of senior management. Based on feedback from shareholders, we have over the last few years adopted proxy access, a special meeting right and the right for shareholders to act by written consent, and implemented changes to our executive compensation programs.program.
During our off-season outreach in 2021,2023, we contacted the holdersover 45 of approximately 53%our largest shareholders, who collectively hold more than 50% of our outstanding shares, and engaged in active discussions on these topics with investors who requested meetings, representing approximately 36%38% of our shares outstanding. OfShareholder feedback during these meetings, our Board Chair participated in discussionsengagements has been widely positive, with investors representing approximately 19% of our shares outstanding. In direct response to the shareholder feedback we received in 2021, we are including a skills matrix and enhancing disclosures regarding Board diversity and the Value Creation Awards in this Proxy Statement.no significant concerns raised about Applied’s governance, compensation or sustainability practices.
Key Themes Discussed with Shareholders in 2023 | ||||
| Corporate Governance | »Appropriate response to the support for a shareholder proposal at last year’s annual meeting seeking a reduced threshold for shareholders to call special meeting »Governance practices, including Board leadership structure and shareholder rights | |||
| »Shareholders’ sustainability focus areas | |||
»Applied’s | ||||
| ||||
| »Thoughtful Board processes for refreshment, succession planning and tenure »Board members’ skills, experience and focus areas | ||||
»Compensation program, recent actions, metrics, sustainability considerations and | ||||
Responsiveness to 2023 Shareholder Proposal to Lower the Threshold to Call a Special Meeting. In response to the support received at our 2023 annual meeting for the shareholder proposal requesting that we lower the ownership threshold required to call a special meeting to 10%, and at the direction of our Governance Committee, we asked our shareholders about their views on our special meeting right during our off-season outreach discussed above. The feedback we received from our shareholders on this topic was reviewed and discussed with our Governance Committee and the Board. After careful consideration of the results of the 2023 proposal and the shareholder feedback we received, as well as a review of market practices and provisions adopted by other companies with respect to the right to call a special meeting, in December 2023, the Board approved an amendment and restatement of our Bylaws to lower the ownership threshold required to call a special meeting from 20% to 10%.
Adjusted Pay Equity Disclosure. During our regular engagement, we have heard from certain shareholders that additional quantitative disclosure regarding employee pay equity would be beneficial. This feedback was reviewed with and considered by the HRCC and the Governance Committee. In response to this feedback, and as part of our continued commitment to enhanced transparency and accountability, we recently published adjusted pay ratios by
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 23 |
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
Board and Corporate Governance Practices
gender for our employees, both globally and in the U.S., as well as the adjusted pay ratio comparing compensation for minorities with non-minorities in the U.S. In each instance, the ratio is based on total compensation, consisting of base salary, cash bonus and equity awards, and in alignment with our compensation philosophy, accounts for factors such as employees’ roles, organizational levels and geographic locations. These adjusted pay ratios are disclosed on our corporate website at: https://www.appliedmaterials.com/us/en/corporate-responsibility/people.html#payequity. We will continue to publish these ratios annually in our Sustainability Report.
Shareholder Communications
Any shareholder wishing to communicate with any of our directors regarding Applied may write to the director, c/o Teri A. Little, Corporate Secretary, Applied Materials, Inc., 3225 Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1268, P.O. Box 58039, Santa Clara, CA 95052, or by e-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com. The Board has instructed the Corporate Secretary to review correspondence directed to the Board and, at the Corporate Secretary’s discretion, forward items that she deems appropriate for the Board’s consideration.
The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines to align the interests of our directors and executive officers with those of our shareholders. The guidelines provide that non-employee directors should each own Applied stock with a value of at least five times the annual base retainer for non-employee directors. Applied’s Chief Executive Officer should own Applied stock with a value of at least six times his
annual base salary. Each Section 16 officer on the CEO Executive StaffLeadership Team should own Applied stock with a value of at least three times their annual base salary. Unearned performance awards and unexercised options (or portions thereof) are not included for purposes of satisfying the guidelines. Directorsapplicable ownership requirement. Under our guidelines, directors and officers may not sell any shares of Applied stock if their ownership is, or following the sale, would fall, below the applicable guideline following the sale.guideline. As of December 31, 2021,2023, all of our directors and executive officers were in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines.
Applied’s Standards of Business Conduct embody our commitment to ethical and legal business practices. The Board expects Applied’s directors, officers and all other members of its workforce to act ethically at all times and to acknowledge their commitment to Applied’s Standards of Business Conduct. The Standards of Business Conduct are available on our website at: http:https://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/investor-relations/governance-documents.
us/en/about/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-documents.html.
The Board met sixfour times in fiscal 2021.2023. Each director attended over 75% of all Board and applicable committee meetings held during fiscal 2021.2023. Directors are strongly encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and all of the directors serving on our Board at the time except for Dr. Chen, attended our virtual 20212023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The Board has three principal committees performing the functions required by applicable SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards to be performed by independent directors: the Audit Committee, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee,HRCC and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Each of these committees meets regularly and has a written charter approved by the Board that is reviewed annually by the respective committee and by the Board. The
Board also has a Strategy and Investment Committee, whose role and responsibilities are described in Applied’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.
At each regularly scheduledregularly-scheduled Board meeting, the Chair of each committee reports on any significant matters addressed by the committee since the last regularly-scheduled Board meeting. Each director who serves on the Audit Committee, Human Resources and Compensation Committee,HRCC, or Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is an independent director under applicable Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules.
Copies of the current charters for the Audit, Human ResourcesHRCC and Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees can be found on our website at: http:https://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/investor-relations/governance-documents.us/en/about/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-documents.html.
| 24 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Board and Corporate Governance Practices
| Audit Committee | Meetings in Fiscal 2023: 28 | |
Audit Committee
Members:
Judy Bruner, Chair*
Kevin P. March* Yvonne McGill* Scott A. McGregor* | Primary responsibilities:
»Oversee the qualifications, independence, performance and engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm
»Oversee financial policies and procedures, disclosure controls and procedures, and internal audit function
»Review and pre-approve audit and permissible non-audit services and approve all audit engagement fees
»Oversee tax, trade, legal, regulatory, and ethical compliance
»Review and approve related-person transactions
»Oversee financial-related risks, enterprise risk management program, and cybersecurity | |||
* Audit Committee Financial |
|
Human Resources and Compensation Committee
Human Resources and Compensation Committee | Meetings in Fiscal 2023: 4 | |
| Members:
Thomas J. Iannotti, Chair Rani Borkar Xun (Eric) Chen Alexander A. Karsner | Primary responsibilities:
»Review and advise on management succession planning and executive organizational development
»Determine compensation policies for executive officers and employees
»Evaluate the performance, and determine the compensation, of executive officers
»Approve and oversee equity-related incentive plans and executive bonus plans
»Review compensation policies and practices as they relate to risk management practices
»Approve the compensation program for Board members
»Oversee human capital management, including the Company’s culture, talent development, and diversity and inclusion programs and initiatives |
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
| Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee | Meetings in Fiscal 2023: 4 | |||
| Members:
Judy Bruner, Chair Alexander A. Karsner Yvonne McGill | Primary responsibilities:
»Identify and recommend qualified candidates for election to the Board
»Establish procedures for director candidate nomination and evaluation
»Oversee corporate governance policies and practices, including the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines
»Review and approve director service on the board of directors of other companies and oversee director education
»Review shareholder proposals,
»Review strategy, policies, performance and reporting related to the Company’s management of
»Oversee the Company’s public policy activities and review the Company’s charitable activities »Review conflict of interest matters for the Board |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 25 |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION Director Compensation
Director Compensation
Compensation Program for Directors
We compensate our non-employee directors for their service on the Board with a combination of cash and equity awards. Directors who are employees of Applied do not receive any compensation for their service as directors.
Retainer and Meeting Fees
Each non-employee director receives an annual cash retainer for their service on the Board, as well as additional cash retainers if they serve as the Chair of the Board, as a member of a committee, or as the chair of a committee. Annual retainers are paid quarterly and are prorated based on the director’s service during the fiscal year. The following table sets forth cash compensation for non-employee directors in effect during fiscal 2021.2023.
Annual Base Retainer (prorated and paid quarterly) | $ | 80,000 | $ | 85,000 | ||||
Additional Annual Retainers for Committee Service (prorated and paid quarterly): |
|
| ||||||
Audit Committee | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | ||||
Human Resources and Compensation Committee | $ | 12,500 | $ | 12,500 | ||||
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | ||||
Strategy and Investment Committee | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | ||||
Additional Annual Retainers for Chair and Committee Chairs (prorated and paid quarterly): |
|
| ||||||
Chair of the Board | $ | 150,000 | $ | 150,000 | ||||
Audit Committee Chair | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | ||||
Human Resources and Compensation Committee Chair | $ | 20,000 | $ | 20,000 | ||||
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair | $ | 12,500 | $ | 12,500 | ||||
Strategy and Investment Committee Chair | $ | 12,500 | $ | 12,500 | ||||
Chair of the Transactions Subcommittee of the Strategy and Investment Committee | $ | 7,500 | ||||||
In addition, upon the determination of the Chair of the Board, non-employee directors may receive $2,000 per meeting for service on the Transactions Subcommitteeany ad-hoc committee of the Strategy and Investment Committee. Board. Non-employee directors are reimbursed for travel and other reasonable out-of-pocket expenses related to attendance at Board and committee meetings, business events on behalf of Applied, and seminars and programs on subjects related to their Board responsibilities.
| 26 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Director Compensation
Equity Compensation
Initial Grant. Upon initial appointment (by the Board) or election (by the shareholders) to the Board other than at an annual meeting of shareholders, a non-employee director receives a non-discretionary grant of restricted stock units with respect to a number of shares of Applied common stock with a fair market value on the date of grant equal to $225,000$240,000 (rounded down to the nearest whole share), pro-rated based on the period starting on the day of initial appointment or election and ending on the day of the next scheduled annual meeting of shareholders.
Annual Grant. Each non-employee director elected at an annual meeting receives on that date a non-discretionary grant of restricted stock units with respect to a number of shares of Applied common stock with a fair market value on the date of grant equal to $225,000$240,000 (rounded down to the nearest whole share). A non-employee director who is initially appointed or elected to the Board on the day of an annual meeting of shareholders receives only an annual grant. Each of our non-employee directors who was re-elected at the 20212023 Annual Meeting received a grant of 1,9192,050 restricted stock units on that date.
Vesting.Grants made to our non-employee directors vest in full on the earlier of March 1 of the year following the date of grant or the date of the next annual meeting, provided the non-employee director remains on the Board through the scheduled vesting date. Vesting of these grants is accelerated in full upon a non-employee director’s earlier termination of service on the Board due to disability or death, or upon a change of control of Applied if the director ceases to be a non-employee director (and does not become a member of the board of directors of any successor corporation or its parent). Non-employee directors may elect in advance to defer receipt of vested shares until their termination of service on the Board.
Limit on Awards.Under our amended and restated Employee Stock Incentive Plan, grants of equity awards to any individual non-employee director may not exceed a fair market value totaling more than $400,000 in any fiscal year.
Charitable Matching Contributions
Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in The Applied Materials Foundation Matching Gift Program, under which The Applied Materials Foundation will annually match up to $3,000 of a non-employee director’s donations during fiscal
2021 to eligible non-profit and educational organizations, and will match an unlimited amount of donations to our annual food drive. In addition, non-employee directors are eligible to participate in a matching program under the Applied Materials, Inc. Political Action Committee, under which the Company annually will match up to $2,500 of a non-employee
director’s contributions for the benefit of eligible non-profit organizations and kindergarten to 12th grade public and non-profit private schools in the U.S. These maximum matching amounts and other terms are the same as those that apply to Applied’s employees.
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 27 |
Director Compensation for Fiscal 20212023
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1)(2) | All Other Compensation ($)(3) | Total ($) | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1)(2) | All Other Compensation ($)(3) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rani Borkar | 78,750 | 276,153 | — | 354,903 | 107,500 | 237,452 | — | 344,952 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Judy Bruner | 152,500 | 223,141 | 4,000 | 379,641 | 157,500 | 237,452 | 3,500 | 398,452 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xun (Eric) Chen | 102,500 | 223,141 | — | 325,641 | 107,500 | 237,452 | — | 344,952 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aart J. de Geus | 90,000 | 223,141 | — | 313,141 | 95,000 | 237,452 | — | 332,452 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas J. Iannotti | 262,500 | 223,141 | 3,500 | 489,141 | 267,500 | 237,452 | 4,000 | 508,952 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alexander A. Karsner | 102,500 | 223,141 | — | 325,641 | 107,500 | 237,452 | — | 344,952 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adrianna C. Ma | 122,500 | 223,141 | 4,000 | 349,641 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kevin P. March | 110,000 | 237,452 | 5,000 | 352,452 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yvonne McGill | 115,000 | 223,141 | 2,500 | 340,641 | 120,000 | 237,452 | — | 357,452 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scott A. McGregor | 127,500 | 223,141 | — | 350,641 | 132,500 | 237,452 | — | 369,952 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen R. Forrest(4) | 40,756 | — | 180,212 | 220,968 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adrianna C. Ma(4) | 30,357 | — | 1,000 | 31,357 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the directors. Instead, these amounts represent the grant date fair value of stock awards granted in fiscal |
| (2) | Each director other than Ms. Ma had |
| (3) | Amounts shown represent The Applied Materials Foundation’s and/or the Company’s matching contribution of the director’s donations/contributions to eligible non-profit |
|
STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Stock Ownership Information
Stock Ownership Information
Principal Shareholders
The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 20212023 by each person known by Applied to own 5% or more of our common stock. In general, “beneficial ownership” refers to shares that an entity or individual had the power to vote or the power to dispose of, and shares that such entity or individual had the right to acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2021.2023.
| Shares Beneficially Owned | ||||||||
| Name | Number | Percent(1) | ||||||
BlackRock, Inc. | 76,304,024 | (2) | 8.61 | % | ||||
The Vanguard Group | 72,982,078 | (3) | 8.23 | % | ||||
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. | 46,137,348 | (4) | 5.20 | % | ||||
|
| Shares Beneficially Owned | |||||||
Name | Number | Percent(1) | ||||||
The Vanguard Group 100 Vanguard Blvd. | 73,671,156 | (2) | 8.87% | |||||
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 | 69,254,574 | (3) | 8.34% | |||||
| (1) | Percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person or group by |
| (2) |
|
The amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) on February |
The amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by |
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 20212023 by: (1) each director and director nominee, (2) each named executive officer and (3) the current directors and executive officers as a group. In general, “beneficial ownership” refers to shares that a director or executive officer had the power to vote or the power to dispose of, and shares that such individual had the right to acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2021.2023.
| Shares Beneficially Owned | ||||||||
| Name | Number(1) | Percent(2) | ||||||
Directors, not including the CEO: | ||||||||
Rani Borkar | (3) | * | ||||||
Judy Bruner | * | |||||||
Xun (Eric) Chen | * | |||||||
Aart J. de Geus | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| * | |||||||
| * | |||||||
| * | |||||||
| (6) | * | ||||||
Yvonne McGill | 11,820 | * | ||||||
| * | |||||||
| ||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | * | |||||||
Brice Hill | 16,679 | * | ||||||
Prabu G. Raja | 362,440 | * | ||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu | 120,730 | * | ||||||
Timothy M. Deane | 54,920 | (7) | * | |||||
Current Directors and Executive Officers, as a Group | * | |||||||
| * | Less than 1% |
| (1) | Except as subject to applicable community property laws and as specified in the footnotes below, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of their shares of common stock. |
| (2) | Percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person or group by the sum of |
| (3) | Consists of 4,438 shares of common stock held in a family trust for which Ms. Borkar shares voting and investment power. |
| (4) | Consists of 29,380 shares of common stock held in a family trust for which Ms. Bruner shares voting and investment power. |
| (5) | Includes |
|
| (6) | Consists of 1,178 shares of common stock held in a family trust for which Mr. March shares voting and |
| (7) | Includes 8,989 restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within 60 days after December 31, |
| (8) | Includes (a) 14,342 restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within 60 days after December 31, 2023 and (b) 23,944 restricted stock units that have vested and which, pursuant to Dr. Chen’s election to defer, will be converted to shares of Applied common stock and paid to |
|
|
|
PROPOSAL 2—APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
PROPOSAL 2—APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS2 – Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of
the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers
PROPOSAL 2 – Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), we are asking shareholders to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs, as described in this Proxy Statement. We seek this approval each year. Our annual “say-on-pay” proposals have been supported by our shareholders each year since we began providing this vote in 2011, and received the support of 87%92% of votes cast in 2021.2023.
Our Board of Directors believes that our compensation policies and practices promote a performance-based culture and align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders through a strong emphasis on at-risk compensation tied to the achievement of performance objectives and shareholder value. Our executive compensation program is also designed to attract and retain highly-talented executives who are critical to the successful implementation of Applied’s strategic plan.
Pay and Performance.Performance-Based Compensation. We align compensation with our business objectives, performance and shareholder interests. See pages 28the section titled “Overview of Compensation Program Philosophy and 37Governance Framework” on page 38 for charts illustratinga discussion of the connection between key financial and Company performance metrics and theprincipal objectives of our executive compensation paid to our CEO during the last five fiscal years.program.
Significant Portion of CEO Pay Consists of Variable Compensation and Long-Term Incentives.Incentives. In fiscal 2021, 95%2023, 96% of our CEO’s compensation comprised variable compensation elements, and 84%90% of his overall compensation
was delivered in equity with multi-year vesting. Performance objectives include financial and market objectives relating to adjusted operating margin, relative TSR, adjusted gross margin and wafer fabrication equipment market share, as well as other strategic and operational objectives, as described on pages 3442 and 35.43.
Please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section for further discussion of our executive compensation program and the fiscal 20212023 compensation of our NEOs.
We are asking our shareholders to approve the compensation of our NEOs as described in this Proxy Statement by voting in favor of the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20222024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the Summary Compensation Table, other compensation tables, narrative discussion and related disclosure.”
Even though this say-on-pay vote is advisory and therefore will not be binding on the Company, the HRCC and the Board value the opinions of our shareholders, and will consider the results of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our NEOs.
| |
| |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
Our Business and Strategy
Applied Materials is the leader in the materials engineering solutions used to produce virtually every new chip and advanced display in the world. Our expertise in modifying materials at atomic levels and on an industrial scale enables customers to transform possibilities into reality. At Applied Materials, our innovations Make Possible® a Better Future.
We develop, design, produce and service semiconductor and display equipment for manufacturers that sell into highly competitive and rapidly changing end markets. Our competitive positioning is driven by the ability of our talented workforce to identify major technology inflections early, and to develop highly differentiated materials engineering solutions for our customers to enable those technology inflections. Through our broad portfolio of products, technologies and services, innovation leadership and focused investments in research and development, we are enabling our customers’ success and creating significant value for our shareholders. Applied’s ability to hire, develop and retain a world-class global workforce is based on our commitment to creating a Culture of Inclusion that embraces different backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences to build stronger, more resilient teams. Consistent with our core values, we enable our employees to do their best work by providing quality training, learning and learningcareer development opportunities; promoting diversity, equity and inclusion;a connected and inclusive culture; and upholding a high standard of ethics and respect for human rights.
In addition to our other accomplishments, we’ve made significantwe continue to make strong progress towards our 10-year road map for environmental and social responsibility.responsibility, which we introduced in 2020. At Applied, making a positive contribution is at the foundation of our culture and of our vision to Make Possible® a Better Future. Our 1x, 100x and 10,000x sustainability framework refers to the holistic goals and commitments we’ve set for our operations, how we work with customers and suppliers, and how our technology can be used to advance sustainability on a global scale. In 2023, we announced our Net Zero 2040 playbook – a clear pathway and detailed plan to work across our industry, including with customers and supply chain partners, to reduce the semiconductor industry’s carbon emissions. More details of Applied’s ESGsustainability vision and strategy, including a copy of the Company’s most recent Sustainability Report, can be found at https://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/corporate-responsibility.
Our Performance Highlights
Over the past several years, our broad portfolio of products and services has madeenabled Applied a more resilient companyto extend its leadership at the major technology inflections that can perform wellare driving our customers’ roadmaps and future industry growth. In fiscal 2023, we delivered record revenue, earnings and cash flow, and we are outgrowing the wafer fabrication equipment market for the fifth year in a variety of market environments. In 2021, we delivered the best financial performance in Applied Materials’ history while navigating a dynamic and challenging environment impacted by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.row. Key highlights of our financial outperformance include:
Record revenue of |
Record |
Record |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Highlights of five-year performance achievements across key financial measures
Revenue Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Margin Non-GAAP Adjusted EPS +57% $14.7B FY2017 $23.1B FY2021 +3.7 PTS 28.0% FY2017 31.7% FY2021 +105% $3.33 FY2017 $6.84 FY2021
Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin and non-GAAP adjusted EPS are performance targets under our long-term incentive and bonus plans. See Appendix A for non-GAAP reconciliations.
Key financial highlights for our reporting segments in fiscal 20212023 include the following:
Semiconductor Systems segment: we |
Applied Global Services segment: we grew revenue to a record |
Display and Adjacent Markets segment: we delivered revenue of |
Strategic and Operational Highlights
Applied’s strategy is to deliver highly differentiated materials engineering products and services that enable major technology inflections and drive our customers’ success.
See inflections early Identify customers' High Value Problems Develop Differentiated Valuable Sustainable products Ensure customer success + Generate residual value
TheSemiconductors are at the foundation of the digital transformation that will affect almost every sector of the global economy accelerated in fiscal 2021, making semiconductors more strategically important toover the world than in any time in history.coming years. Long-term megatrends including the Internet of Things (IoT), big data and artificial intelligence (AI) are fueling increased demanda new era of growth for semiconductors and driving the need for next-generationadvancements in silicon technologies. Applied Materials has focused its strategy and investments to deliver innovations that accelerate improvements in the power, performance, area, cost and time-to-market (PPACt™) of next-generation semiconductor devices. Key strategic and operational accomplishments during fiscal 20212023 include:
|
We |
| » | We strengthened our |
| » | In our services business, we grew our industry-leading installed base to more than 48,000 systems, increased the number of systems under service agreement to 16,600, and added new types of subscription agreements including sensor and AI-based solutions. In addition, we signed a unique environmental services agreement with a customer that helps reduce electricity consumption and carbon emissions. |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
|
We continued to make substantial progress towards our 10-year roadmap for environmental and social responsibility, as described in more detail on |
Total Shareholder Return Performance
In fiscal 2021, our2023, Applied delivered strong total shareholder return, performance reflected increased demand for semiconductors and wafer fab equipment driven by the digital transformationas a result of the global economy.Company’s ability to deliver record financial results in a down year for the wafer fabrication equipment market. As shown below, for the five year period beginning with fiscal 2019, Applied has substantially outperformed the S&P 500 Index, and our peer group over the past five years, reflecting the company’s ability to create unique and innovative materials engineering solutions that accelerate itsour customers’ technology roadmaps. In addition, from the close of market on the last trading day of fiscal 2021 through the close of market on December 31, 2021, Applied’s stock price increased by approximately 15%.
Fiscal 20172019 – Fiscal 20212023 Total Shareholder Return vs. S&P 500 and Proxy Peers1
| 1 | Reflects results from October 28, 2018 through October 29, 2023. Proxy peer data reflects the companies in Applied’s current compensation peer group approved by the HRCC in June 2023, as described on page 39, weighted by market capitalization. |
450% 400% 350% 300% 250% 200% 150% 100% 50% 0% FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 402% 231% 138% AMAT FY21 Proxy Peers S&P 500
1 Reflects results from October 31, 2016 through October 29, 2021, sourced from S&P Capital IQ. Proxy peer data reflects companies set forth on page 31, weighted by market capitalization.
Key Compensation Actions
Performance-Based Compensation Decisions. The HRCC approved an aggressive set of performance goals for the executive officers for fiscal 2021,2023, including challenging financial and operational targets above any levels that Applied had achieved indespite a difficult external landscape, including macro-economic uncertainty, a complex geopolitical environment and an anticipated down year for the past, as well as equally challenging operational targets. No adjustments were made during the year to the performance goals or to the Company’s results in determining incentive payouts.wafer fabrication equipment market. During fiscal 2021,2023, Applied delivered exceptional financial and operational results, meeting or exceeding most of its stretch objectives for the year in a continuing challenging environment, and made meaningful progress towards our long-term strategic goals that remain focused on enabling strong longer-term revenue and EPS growth. As a result, bonus payouts for the executive officers were, on average, modestly above target. No adjustments were made during the year to the performance goals or to the Company’s results used in determining incentive payouts.
As part of our multi-year incentive program, for the period of 2019fiscal 2021 through 2021,2023, the HRCC approved aggressivechallenging goals for non-GAAP adjusted operating margin and relative total shareholder return. The results for this three-year performance period significantly exceeded target performance levels, resulting in above-target vesting of performance share unit awards forgranted to our executive officers.officers in fiscal 2021.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Value Creation Awards. As described in the Company’s 2021 proxy statement, in early fiscal 2021 the HRCC approved long-term value creation awards for Mr. Dickerson, Mr. Durn Compensation Discussion and Dr. Raja. The HRCC concluded that an incremental incentive opportunity would (i) strengthen the alignment of the officers’ interests with those of the Company’s shareholders, during a period when Applied can take advantage of significant value creation opportunities resulting from rapid changes in the technology industry, and (ii) help secure the benefit of the officers’ leadership in a highly competitive market for proven executive talent among technology companies, as underscored by Mr. Durn’s subsequent departure. As a result of a number of months of careful deliberation of award design, the awards were structured to:Analysis
|
|
|
Mr. Durn forfeited his award as a result of his departure. The HRCC does not expect to grant similar awards in the coming years. For additional information regarding the Value Creation Awards, please see page 39.
ESG Objective. We have added ESG objectives to the fiscal 2021 annual incentive plan, to measure and incentivize progress towards our long-term ESG goals. While the Company’s ESG goals are long-term in nature, the HRCC believes that it is important to annually assess progress towards those goals. As a result, the HRCC included ESG objectives in the annual incentive program, rather than in long-term incentive awards. For additional information regarding the annual incentive program, please see page 31. For additional information regarding the Company’s ESG goals and accomplishments, please see page xii.
Chief Financial Officer Transition. In October 2021, we announced the departure of our prior Chief Financial Officer, Daniel J. Durn, and the appointment of Robert J. Halliday as Applied’s interim CFO while the Company conducts a search for Mr. Durn’s successor. The structure of the compensation approved for Mr. Halliday, as detailed on page 42, reflects the anticipated limited-term nature of his appointment.
Primary Compensation Elements and Executive Compensation Highlights for Fiscal 20212023
The primary elements of our compensation program consist ofare base salary, annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive awards. Other elements of compensation include a 401(k) savings plan, deferred compensation benefits and other benefits programs that are generally available to all eligible employees. Primary elements and highlights of our fiscal 20212023 compensation program for our NEOs (except for Mr. Halliday) were as follows:
| Element of Pay | Structure | Highlights | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary (see page |
|
»Fixed cash compensation for performing expected day-to-day responsibilities
»Reviewed annually and adjusted |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
as appropriate, based on scope of responsibility, performance, time in role, experience, and competitive market for executive talent | »Reflecting (i) continued strong performance across the business, driven by our executive leadership, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
»Reflecting the HRCC’s belief that CEO compensation should be predominantly tied to long-term results, the Committee has not increased the salary for our CEO since December 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| »Variable cash compensation
»Based on performance
»Includes assessment of the Company’s progress towards
»Financial and non-financial metrics provide a comprehensive assessment of executive performance
»Performance metrics evaluated annually
»NEO annual incentives determined through a three-step performance
|
| »No increase in target bonus as a percentage of base salary from fiscal
»The initial performance hurdle for fiscal
»Resulting payouts ranged from
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
»PSUs vest based 50% on achievement of 3-year non-GAAP adjusted operating margin goal and 50% on 3-year TSR relative to the members of the S&P 500 Index
»PSUs vest at end of 3-year performance period, based on achievement of performance goals; RSUs vest ratably over 3 years
|
| »The target mix of
»Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin is a key measure of our Company’s long-term success
»Relative TSR incentivizes management to outperform the market in any business environment
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 35 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Pay Mix
In fiscal 2021,2023, a significant portion of our executiveexecutives’ compensation consisted of variable compensation and long-term incentives. As illustrated below, 95%96% of CEO compensation for fiscal 20212023 consisted of variable compensation elements, and 84%90% of CEO compensation was delivered in equitylong-term incentive awards with multi-year vesting.
Fiscal | ||
CEO | All Other NEOs | |
|
| |
1 Represents total direct compensation for fiscal 2021, including the grant date fair value of annual equity awards but not including the grant date fair value of the Value Creation Awards, which are not expected to be made in subsequent years and are not representative of ongoing compensation.
| 1 | Represents total direct compensation for fiscal 2023, including the grant date fair value of annual long-term incentive awards. |
2 Excludes Mr. Durn, whose fiscal 2021 compensation reflects only partial-year service, and Mr. Halliday, whose fiscal 2021 compensation is not representative of ongoing NEO compensation.
Summary of 20212023 Total Direct Compensation
The following table summarizes elements of annual total direct compensation for our NEOs for fiscal 2021,2023, consisting of (1) base salary received during the year, (2) actual annual incentive bonus payout and (3) long-term incentive awards (the grant date fair value of stock awards). This table excludes amounts not considered by the HRCC to be annual total direct compensation, such as certain other amounts required by the SEC to be reported in the “All Other Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table (see page 4554 of this Proxy Statement). Additionally, the grant date fair value of the Value Creation Awards is shown separately as these awards are not expected to be made in subsequent years and are not representative of annual total direct compensation.
| Name and Principal Position | Salary(1) ($) | Annual ($) | Annual ($) | Total ($) | Value ($) | |||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson President and Chief Executive Officer | 1,049,808 | 2,039,400 | 16,696,405 | 19,785,613 | 15,014,064 | |||||||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja Senior Vice President, Semiconductor Products Group | 648,135 | 1,195,703 | 4,780,991 | 6,624,829 | 4,619,937 | |||||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour Senior Vice President, Services, Display and Flexible Technology | 653,942 | 974,152 | 4,501,365 | 6,129,459 | — | |||||||||||||||
Om Nalamasu Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer | 552,789 | 848,513 | 3,019,654 | 4,420,956 | — | |||||||||||||||
Robert J. Halliday(3) Interim Chief Financial Officer | 268,500 | 351,844 | — | 620,344 | — | |||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn(4) Former Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | 681,635 | — | 5,312,294 | 5,993,929 | 4,619,937 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position | Salary ($) | Annual ($) | Annual ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson President and Chief Executive Officer | 1,030,000 | 1,631,520 | 23,951,048 | 26,612,568 | ||||||||||||
Brice Hill Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Global Information Services | 708,846 | 1,019,304 | 5,530,849 | 7,258,999 | ||||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja President, Semiconductor Products Group | 740,000 | 1,091,475 | 6,636,826 | 8,468,301 | ||||||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer | 625,385 | 742,203 | 4,037,503 | 5,405,091 | ||||||||||||
Timothy M. Deane Group Vice President, Applied Global Services | 574,947 | 733,590 | 3,097,266 | 4,405,803 | ||||||||||||
Pay and Performance
The HRCC sets aggressive performance goals for the CEO, as well as for the entire executive leadership team. As a result, despite outstanding TSR growth from fiscal 2017 through 2021, our CEO’s ongoing total direct compensation has remained within a comparable range over the same period. Given the non-recurring nature of the Value Creation Award granted to Mr. Dickerson in early fiscal 2021, that award is not reflected in the chart below. However, the HRCC intends to take the value of that award into consideration when making future compensation decisions for Mr. Dickerson.
Total Direct Compensation (1) Total Shareholder Return (2) $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 Value of $100 Invested on 10/27/2017 FY2017 $14.5 FY2018 $13.7 FY2019 $13.9 FY2020 $17.1 FY2021 $19.8 $60 Annual Total Director Compensation ($ million) $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Other Key Compensation Practices
We are committed to executive compensation practices that drive performance, mitigate risk and align the interests of our leadership team with those of our shareholders. Below is a summary of best practices that we have implemented because we believe they are in the best interests of Applied orand our shareholders, and practices that we avoid because we believe they run counter to those interests.
| WHAT WE DO | WHAT WE DO NOT DO | |||||||
|
Pay for Performance– Significant majority of NEO target compensation is performance-based and tied to pre-established performance goals aligned with our short- and long-term objectives. |
|
No Guaranteed Bonuses– Our annual bonus plans are performance-based and do not include any guaranteed minimum payment levels. | |||||
|
| |||||||
|
Mitigation of Risk– Use of varied performance measures and of payout limits in incentive programs mitigates risk that executives will be motivated to pursue results with respect to any one performance measure to the detriment of Applied as a whole. |
|
No Hedging or Pledging– Our insider trading policy prohibits all directors, NEOs and other employees from engaging in hedging or other speculative trading, and prohibits directors and NEOs from pledging their shares. | |||||
|
| |||||||
|
Compensation |
|
No Excessive Perquisites– We do not provide material perquisites or other personal benefits to our NEOs or directors, except for security purposes | |||||
|
| |||||||
|
Stock Ownership Guidelines– All senior officers and directors are subject to stock ownership guidelines to ensure their interests are aligned with shareholders’ interests. |
|
No Dividends on Unvested | |||||
|
| |||||||
|
Double-Trigger Change-in-Control Provisions– For vesting to accelerate, |
|
No Executive Pensions– We do not offer any executive pension plans. | |||||
|
| |||||||
|
Annual Say-On-Pay Vote– We seek annual shareholder feedback on our executive compensation program. |
|
No Tax Gross-Ups– We do not pay tax gross-ups, except in connection with business-related relocation or expatriate assignments. | |||||
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Governance and Decision-Making Framework
Overview of Compensation Program Philosophy and Governance Framework
Our executive compensation program has three principal objectives:
| » | To attract, reward and retain highly-talented executive officers and other key employees; |
| » | To motivate these individuals to achieve short-term and long-term goals that enhance shareholder value; and |
| » | To support our core values and culture. |
We seek to achieve these objectives by:
| » | Providing compensation that is competitive with the practices of other leading high-technology companies; and |
| » | Linking rewards to Company and individual performance by: |
Setting challenging performance goals for executive officers and other key employees; |
Balancing retention needs with performance objectives; and |
Providing a high proportion of total target compensation in the form of |
The HRCC uses these principles to set appropriate base salary levels and to design and determine annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive awards. The HRCC also considers Applied’s business strategy and objectives, external factors such as the geopolitical and economic environment, competitive practices and trends, and corporate considerations,factors, including the overall cost of the compensation program.
The HRCC further considers the results of the annual advisory “say-on-pay” vote and shareholder feedback. At our Annual Meeting in 2021,2023, our “say-on-pay” proposal received a substantial majority (87%(92%) of votes cast, reflecting continuing strong support for our ongoing executive
compensation program. BasedFollowing the Annual Meeting and throughout the remainder of 2023, we continued our extensive shareholder outreach efforts and specifically solicited feedback on feedback we heard from investors, we have expanded our disclosure related to the Value Creation Awards this year and re-emphasized that the HRCC does not expect to grant similar awardsexecutive compensation program. A broad group of Applied management team members participated in the coming years. In considerationoutreach through a series of thisvirtual meetings and conference calls, with active independent director participation either directly on the calls or through oversight of the shareholder engagement program. During those discussions, we continued to receive broadly positive investor feedback on the compensation program structure and design. Taking into account the results of the “say-on-pay” vote at our 2023 Annual Meeting and the shareholder feedback from our shareholders gathered through our outreach efforts, the HRCC approved an executive compensation program structure for fiscal 20212023 that iswas generally unchanged from the fiscal 20202022 program.
Fiscal 2021Compensation Program Peer Group Companies
The HRCC regularly reviews the structure and amount of compensation paid by our peer group, which consists of a broad range of high-technology companies whose businesses are similarcomparable to ours and with whom we typicallyare likely to compete for executive talent, as a reference point for evaluating our compensation program.
For the composition of the fiscal 2021 peer group, the The HRCC consideredgenerally screens for companies that metmeet the following criteria: (1) innovative technology companies with product manufacturing, (2) companies whose revenues and market capitalization were approximately one-fourth to five times that of Applied, (3) publicly-traded companies with global operations that disclose executive compensation pursuant to SEC rules, and (4) companies that represent: (i) industry competitors, (ii) competitors for key talent, (iii) customers or suppliers, and/or (iv) comparable alternatives for shareholder investment. Based on this assessment, during fiscal 2021 the HRCC determined to remove Seagate Technology and add NXP Semiconductors. Each of the companies in the resulting peer group meets most or all of the four screening criteria.
Data gathered on executive compensation practices across the peer group include base salary levels, bonus payouts, target and actual cash compensation, long-term incentive award values and total compensation levels. The HRCC uses this information as a reference point in informing its decision making, rather than targeting a specific percentile of the peer data for our NEOs. The executive compensation data for the peer group datacompanies is gathered from the sources described in “Role of Compensation Consultant” below.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Our fiscal 20212023 peer group established in March 2022 and unchanged from the fiscal 2022 peer group, and related informationour relative size compared to the peer companies at the time of the HRCC’s establishment of the peer group, are set forth below.
| Fiscal | |||
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Lam Research Corporation | ||
Analog Devices, Inc. | Micron Technology, Inc. | ||
| Motorola Solutions, Inc. | ||
|
| ||
Cisco Systems, Inc. | NVIDIA | ||
Corning | NXP Semiconductors N.V. | ||
Intel | QUALCOMM | ||
| Texas Instruments | ||
| Western Digital | ||
Applied Materials Positioning Relative to Peers1
Revenue Market Capitalization 100th percentile 100thPercentile 50th percentileRevenuePercentile Rank
| 1 | As of the HRCC’s review in March |
In June 2023, the HRCC conducted a review of the peer group, using the screening criteria described above. Based on this assessment, the HRCC determined to (i) remove NetApp and replace it with International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), to bring the median size of the peer group closer to that of Applied, and (ii) otherwise leave the fiscal 2023 peer group unchanged. Each of the companies in the resulting peer group met most or all of the four screening criteria.
Components of Total Direct Compensation
Determining Total Direct Compensation
At the beginning of fiscal 2021,2023, the HRCC evaluated and established total direct compensation – consisting of base salary, target annual incentive opportunity for the fiscal year and long-term incentive award value – for each NEO (other than Mr. Halliday who became an executive officer near the end of fiscal 2021).NEO. As part of this annual evaluation, the HRCC considered the NEO’s scope of responsibility, performance, skill set, prior experience and achievements, advancement potential, impact on results and expected future contribution to our business. The HRCC also considered the compensation levels of each executive officer relative to other Applied officers, the need to attract and retain talent, business conditions, and compensation levels at our peer companies for comparable positions; however, no individual element of compensation iswas targeted to a peer percentile range. Following the end of fiscal 2021,2023, the HRCC determined payouts for performance-based compensation programs, based on the performance of the Company and individual NEOs as compared to pre-established objectives.
Base SalariesTarget Cash Compensation
Base salaries and bonus opportunities are designed to attract, motivate, reward and retain executive talent,highly-talented executives, as well as to align pay with performance. Base salaries represent an annual fixed level of cash compensation. Applied continues to focus the weighting of cash compensation more heavily toward performance-based incentives. At the beginning of each fiscal year (or at the time of an executive officer’s hire or appointment, as applicable), the HRCC determines each NEO’s targetedtarget total cash compensation (salary and target bonus).
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 39 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Base Salaries
Base salaries represent an annual fixed level of cash compensation. Based on its review in early fiscal 2021,2023, the HRCC determined to increase the base salary level for each NEO excludingother than Mr. Dickerson, whose base salary the CEO.HRCC determined not to change, consistent with their belief that CEO compensation should be predominantly tied to long-term results. The HRCC believed that such increases were appropriate given the significant increase in the size and complexity of Applied and its businesses over the preceding
years, the continued expansion of the scope and complexity of the NEOs’ responsibilities and the limited increases to NEO salaries during that time. However, the salary levelongoing demand for Mr. Dickerson was unchanged, given the HRCC’s belief that CEO compensation should be predominantly tied to long-term results. Mr. Halliday’s base salary for service as interim CFO was established at the time of his appointment to the role.proven executive talent among technology companies.
Annual Incentive Bonus Opportunities
Bonus Plan Overview. In fiscal 2021,2023, all of our NEOs participated in the Senior Executive Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”), although Mr. Durn forfeited any potential payout in connection with his departure.. The Bonus Plan is a shareholder-approved bonus program designed to motivate and reward achievement of Applied’s business goals, in alignment with delivering shareholder value, and to attract and retain highly-talented individuals.value. The annual incentive bonus opportunity for each NEO under the Bonus Plan is directly linked to Applied’s achievement of financial and market performance, operational performance and strategic objectives, in addition to individual performance. Company and individual goals are designedstructured to incentivize management to drive strong operating performance, invest in innovation to drive future growth and create shareholder value. Our Bonus Plan is performance-based and does not include any guaranteed minimum payment levels.
Determining Target Bonus Amounts. Target bonus amounts for the NEOs are expressed as a percentage of base salary. The HRCC approves the annual target bonus amount for each NEO, taking into consideration Mr. Dickerson’s recommendations regarding the annual target bonus amounts for each of the NEOs other than himself. In early fiscal 2021,2023, Mr. Dickerson recommended that for each NEO – other than Mr. Halliday, who was not an executive officer at the time – the target bonus amountsamount as a percentage of base salary for Mr. Deane be increased to 120%, in recognition of his new role, and that the target bonus amounts for each other NEO remain unchanged from fiscal 2020.2022. Similarly, based on a comprehensive review and with input from its independent
compensation consultant, the HRCC determined not to change Mr. Dickerson’s target bonus amount from fiscal 2020.2022.
Mr. Halliday’s target bonus opportunity for service as interim CFO was established at the time of his appointment to the
role. Mr. Halliday’s fiscal 2021 bonus opportunity was prorated to reflect his service as corporate vice president for the first 11 months of the year and interim CFO for the last month of the year.
Assessing Performance and Payout. The determination of fiscal 20212023 performance and annual incentive bonuses for our NEOs consisted of three key steps, as illustrated in the diagram below and explaineddescribed in more detail in the subsequent discussion.below.
Initial Performance Goal Initial PerformanceHurdle Thresholdperformancerequirement that mustbe achieved for anybonuses to bepayable Performance hurdlefor fiscal 2021 wasnon-GAAP adjustedEPS of $5.25 N Corporate ScorecardE Assessment ofperformance against predefinedfinancial,operational, and strategiccorporate goals For fiscal 2021, 50%based on financial andmarket performance;50% based on objectiveand measurableoperational and strategicgoalsO B Individual PerformanceFactoron Assessment of individualNEO performance againstpersonal objectives andevaluation of contributionto the success of theirrespective business unit orfunction and overallApplied successus Determination
The HRCC believes that this multi-step performance framework appropriately emphasizes financial performance, while also providing a mechanism to assess achievement of key business imperatives by individual NEOs.
Initial Performance Hurdle. For fiscal 2021,2023, the HRCC chose non-GAAP adjusted EPS as the initial performance hurdle.hurdle measure under the Bonus Plan. EPS, an indicator of overall Company financial performance, is a measure of profits generated on a per-share basis that are available either to reinvest in the business or to distribute to shareholders, and has a strong link to share price valuation.price. Adjusted EPS is a non-GAAP measure that excludes certain items
| 40 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
from EPS determined in accordance with GAAP (see Appendix A for a reconciliation of non-GAAP adjusted EPS). Non-GAAP adjusted EPS includes the impact of share-based compensation expenses.
If Applied doesdid not achieve athe initial performance hurdle (a threshold non-GAAP adjusted EPS for the fiscal year, (setset at $5.25$6.00 for fiscal 2021)2023), no bonus iswould be payable. If this threshold is achieved, the maximum bonus that becomes payable for each NEO is the lowest of: (a) $5 million, (b) 3x the corporate bonus pool funding modifier multiplied by thethat NEO’s target bonus, and (c) 3x thethat NEO’s target bonus. The HRCC established a somewhat lower threshold for fiscal 2023 compared to fiscal 2022 to reflect the potential impact to fiscal 2023 financial results stemming from the uncertain macroeconomic and geopolitical environment at the beginning of the fiscal year. The HRCC believed that the initial hurdle was sufficiently challenging given that it represented performance far ahead of levels the Company had achieved prior to fiscal 2021 and because the bonus payouts for the NEOs are ultimately determined by the HRCC’s assessments of achievement of objectives on the balanced corporate scorecard and individual NEO performance.
In fiscal 2021, Applied’s non-GAAP adjusted EPS was $6.84, resulting in achievement of2023, Applied exceeded the initial performance hurdle under the Bonus Plan. Adjusted EPS is a Plan by delivering non-GAAP measure that excludes certain items from EPS determined in accordance with GAAP (see Appendix A for a reconciliation of non-GAAP adjusted EPS).
Non-GAAP adjusted EPS includes the impact of share-based compensation expenses.$8.05.
Balanced Corporate Scorecard. If the initial performance hurdle is achieved, the HRCC then reviews the level of achievement of pre-defined objectives on the corporate scorecard and determines the appropriate scorecard result for the fiscal year. The scorecard is designed to measure achievement of financial and non-financial objectives that are considered by the HRCC to be key drivers of the Company’s near-term financial and operational success that will create shareholder value over the longer-term. The fiscal 20212023 scorecard measured company performance in fourfive broad categories: (1) Financial and Market Performance and Execution, (2) Products and Growth, (3) Services and Subscription, (4) Customers and (4)Markets, and (5) People and Organization. These categories align with and support the Company’s strategy of strengthening our materials engineering capabilities to enable major technology inflections for our customers and positioning Applied for sustainable growth to support long-term value creation for our shareholders. Beginning withSince fiscal 2021, the corporate scorecard includes ESGhas included sustainability objectives, with performance measured based on Applied’s successfully making annual progress towardsrequired to meet our long-term ESGDEI and sustainability goals.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Scorecard Category | Weighting | Link to Company Strategy and Performance | ||
| 50% | Incentivizes achievement of financial, market share and TSR goals and focuses on delivering sustainable performance that increases shareholder value
Aligns with increased efficiency in operational process | |||
Reinforces strategy of developing new and differentiated products and | ||||
| 10% | Increases focus on continued profitable growth of the services business with an increasingly large portion being converted to subscriptions | |||
| 5% | Promotes focus on customer service by improving growth and efficiency at key accounts and applications | |||
Drives progress towards achieving long-term | ||||
NEO Objectives and Weightings. Each NEO was assigned individualized weightings for scorecard measuresobjectives to reflect the relative impact and contributions of that NEO and histheir business or organizational unit to Applied’s overall performance with respect to a particular measure.objective. The corporate scorecard objectives and weightings for each NEO are set forth in the table below.
Goal Setting and Measurement. At the beginning of the fiscal year, the HRCC reviewed objectives and individual weightings proposed by management, and provided input on the corporate scorecard and weightings for each NEO (other than Mr. Halliday, whose weightings reflect the general corporate scorecard).NEO. Performance hurdlesobjectives were set to
measure achievement at 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 levels, with a score of 1.0 indicating performance that met very high expectations and with
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 41 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
scores over 1.0 indicating extraordinary achievement. Scorecard objectives are intended to be very challenging, to incentivize our NEOs to achieve performance levels that are higher than our externally communicated financial targets. Consequently, delivering results below the 100% target1.0 level can still represent very meaningful progress towards our long-term strategic goals. At the end of the fiscal year, scores were calculated based on actual performance against objectives and were presented to the HRCC to review, adjust and approve.
The following table shows the fiscal 20212023 corporate scorecard objectives, their relative weightings for each NEO,of the NEOs, the achievements based on performance against rigorous objectives and the resulting scores, as approved by the HRCC (see Appendix A for non-GAAP reconciliations). The HRCC approved an aggressive set of scorecard targets for the executive officers for fiscal 2021,2023, including financial targets far above any levels that Applied had achievedrequired continued sustained strong performance in the past, as well asan uncertain external environment, equally challenging operational targets.targets, and a focus on continued progress towards positioning the company to achieve its long-term objectives. During fiscal 2021,2023, Applied delivered exceptional financial and operational performance and made meaningful progress towards our long-term strategic goals focused on enabling strong longer-term revenue and EPS growth. However, due to an industry-wide slowdown and a challenging geopolitical and macroeconomic environment during fiscal 2023, the Company did not fully meet some of the aggressive goals set for the year.
ForBeginning with the fiscal 2021 corporate scorecard, the HRCC added a broader ESGsustainability objective – beyond the Company’s existing focus on diversity and inclusion – to demonstrate Applied’s commitment to driving sustainability throughout our business and to provide a discrete incentive for management to execute on our new ESGsustainability strategy. While the Company’s ESGsustainability goals are long-term in nature, the HRCC believes that it is important to annually review, measure and assess progress towards those goals. As a result, the HRCC included ESGsustainability objectives in the annual incentive program, rather than in long-term incentive awards. More detail on the Company’s ESGsustainability framework and 2021 objectives and2023 accomplishments can be found on page xii.pages xi through xiv.
| Weightings | Achievements | Score | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Objectives | Dickerson | Halliday | Raja | Salehpour | Nalamasu | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial and Market Performance and Execution | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |||||||||||||||||||||
· Grow wafer fabrication equipment market share (measured by VLSI Research) | 12% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 12% | ● Delivered record revenue and increased company level backlog by 77%, but due to late-year supply chain challenges, CY21 share is forecasted to be roughly flat | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
· Achieve targeted Service revenue growth | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | ● Exceeded Service growth goal and delivered record Service revenue for the year | 1.25 | |||||||||||||||||||
· Achieve targeted Free Cash Flow | 4% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 4% | ● Generated Free Cash Flow modestly below challenging target for the year | 0.75 | |||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve adjusted gross margin targets (gross margin reported externally) | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | ● Delivered 47.5% non-GAAP adjusted gross margin, 2.4% higher than fiscal 2020 | 1.25 | |||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve adjusted operating margin goal (operating margin reported externally) | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | ● Achieved 31.7% non-GAAP adjusted operating margin, 5.4% higher than fiscal 2020 | 1.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
● Achieve Total Shareholder Return (TSR) ranking target relative to peers | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | ● Led all peers with fiscal 2021 TSR of 159% | 2.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
● Improve operational, quality and safety performance | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | ● Successfully drove improvements in key operational, quality and safety metrics | 1.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Products and Growth | 32.5% | 32.5% | 32.5% | 32.5% | 42.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
● Deliver key milestones that demonstrate progress towards targeted fiscal 2024 performance for semiconductor businesses | 15% | 15% | 20% | 5% | 2.5% | ● Exceeded aggressive milestones towards delivering 2024 revenue target for semiconductor businesses | 1.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
● Deliver key milestones that demonstrate progress towards targeted fiscal 2024 performance for Display business | 5% | 5% | 1.5% | 12.5% | 7.5% | ● Made progress towards delivering 2024 targets for Display business, but some results were below the aggressive goals set for the year | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
● Deliver key milestones that demonstrate progress towards targeted fiscal 2024 performance for Service business | 7.5% | 7.5% | 7.5% | 10% | 2.5% | ● Made significant progress towards 2024 targets for the Service business | 1.25 | |||||||||||||||||||
● Deliver key milestones that demonstrate progress towards targeted fiscal 2024 performance for new/adjacent market growth | 5% | 5% | 3.5% | 5% | 30% | ● Developed strong pipeline of opportunities in new and adjacent growth areas | 1.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Customers | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
● Win development tool of record and production tool of record positions at key customers; grow target applications for systems and service | 5% | 5% | 5% | 5% | — | ● Exceeded aggressive development and production tool of record goals, as well as application growth goals for systems and service | 1.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
● Execute Preferred Strategic Partner plans by customer | 5% | 5% | 5% | 5% | — | ● Exceeded milestones measuring our status as the Preferred Strategic Partner to our customers | 1.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Objectives | Weightings | Achievements |  | |||||||||||||||||||
|  |  |  | |||||||||||||||||||
Financial and Market Performance and Execution | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Grow wafer fabrication equipment market share (measured by VLSI Research) | 10% | 10% | 10% | 7% | Estimated market share for CY23 is highest in 20 years | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Achieve targeted Services core revenue growth | 2% | 2% | 2% | 5% | Delivered record Services core revenue, but fell short of our aggressive goal | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Achieve targeted talent and productivity milestones and execute on employee engagement initiatives to position Applied to place in top quartile of benchmark for FY24 employee engagement survey | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | Achieved targeted talent and productivity milestones and executed on employee engagement initiatives | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Achieve adjusted gross margin targets (gross margin reported externally) and deliver key milestones for gross margin improvement initiatives | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | Delivered 46.8% non-GAAP adjusted gross margin, a modest increase from fiscal 2022, but below target | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Achieve adjusted operating margin goal (operating margin reported externally) and days inventory outstanding targets | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | Achieved 29.1% non-GAAP adjusted operating margin, a modest decrease from fiscal 2022, and below target | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Achieve TSR ranking target relative to peers | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8% | Outperformed peers during the fiscal year | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Improve operational, quality and employee health and safety performance | 7.5% | 7.5% | 7.5% | 7.5% | Achieved key operational and quality metrics | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
| Weightings | Achievements | Score | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Objectives | Dickerson | Halliday | Raja | Salehpour | Nalamasu | |||||||||||||||||||||
People and Organization | 7.5% | 7.5% | 7.5% | 7.5% | 7.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
● ESG objective – Demonstrate targeted progress towards increasing representation of women and underrepresented minorities | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | ● Continued progress toward achieving our longer-term objectives, but fell short of near-term representation goals | 0.75 | |||||||||||||||||||
● ESG objective – Demonstrate progress towards achieving other long-term Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) goals | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | ● Met key 2021 milestones towards Company’s 2030 ESG goals | 1.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
● Drive organizational development | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 2% | ● Exceeded employee training and development goals | 1.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Score based on achievement of goals tied to objective and quantifiable metrics aligned with Company strategy
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
| Objectives | Weightings | Achievements | | |||||||||||||||||||
| | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Products and Growth | 30% | 30% | 40% | 20% |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Deliver key milestones that demonstrate progress towards targeted fiscal 2025 performance for semiconductor businesses | 15% | 20% | 5% | 7.5% | Achieved milestones towards meeting 2025 revenue target for semiconductor businesses | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Achieve key milestones that demonstrate progress towards targeted fiscal 2025 performance for Integrated Materials Solution (IMS) business | 3.5% | 5% | 1.5% | 3% | Achieved milestones towards meeting 2025 targets for IMS business | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Deliver key milestones that demonstrate progress towards targeted fiscal 2025 performance for AIx application | 3.5% | 5% | 1.5% | 5% | Achieved milestones towards meeting 2025 targets for AIx application | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Deliver key milestones that demonstrate progress towards targeted fiscal 2025 performance for Display business | 5% | 0% | 7% | 2.5% | Made progress towards 2025 targets for Display business, but did not fully achieve milestones set for the year | 0.75 | ||||||||||||||||
Deliver key milestones that demonstrate progress towards targeted fiscal 2025 performance for new and adjacent market growth | 3% | 0% | 25% | 2% | Developed pipeline of opportunities in new and adjacent growth areas but did not fully meet the milestones for the year | 0.75 | ||||||||||||||||
Services and Subscription | 10% | 10% | 5% | 20% |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Achieve key milestones that demonstrate progress towards targeted fiscal 2025 performance for Service business | 7.5% | 7.5% | 3.5% | 15% | Achieved milestones towards 2025 targets for Service business | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Achieve targeted subscription revenue growth for Service business | 2.5% | 2.5% | 1.5% | 5% | Subscription revenue growth fell short of aggressive goals | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Customers and Markets | 5% | 5% | — | 5% |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Win prioritized target engagements at leading customers and accounts | 2.5% | 2.5% | — | 2.5% | Exceeded development and production tool of record goals, as well as application growth goals for systems and services | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Enhance customer trust by achieving targeted product safety, on-time delivery and installation performance | 2.5% | 2.5% | — | 2.5% | Met product safety and on-time delivery performance targets | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||
People and Organization | 5% | 5% | 5% | 5% |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Demonstrate targeted progress towards increasing representation of women and underrepresented minorities and launch DEI Engine | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | Continued progress toward achieving our longer-term objectives and successfully launched the DEI Engine | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Demonstrate progress towards achieving other long-term sustainability goals | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | Met key milestones towards Company’s 2030 sustainability goals and launched our collaborative net-zero playbook | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Scores are based on achievement of goals tied to objective and quantifiable metrics aligned with Company strategy
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 43 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Individual Performance Factor. The HRCC also considered the individual performance of each NEO as indicated by that Each NEO’s individual performance factor (“IPF”). reflects an assessment of their individual performance and contributions. The IPF is only applied only if the initial performance hurdle and at least some of the corporate scorecard objectives wereare achieved. The IPF modifiedmodifies the initial bonus amount as determined based on achievement against theof corporate scorecard objectives. IPF modifiers can range from 0 to 1.5.
The HRCC determined the IPFs for all NEOs. In determining the IPFs, the HRCC took into consideration: (i) financial performance, which exceeded target performance on EPS, (ii) results of the corporate scorecard and associated goals, (iii) the leadership team’s ability to guide Applied through continued unprecedented disruption caused by the COVID-19 global pandemic, and (iv) each executive’s capable leadership of his respective business unit or function.
The HRCC determined the IPF for each NEO, other than Mr. Dickerson, byafter taking into consideration Mr. Dickerson’s recommendation, which included his assessment of the achievement of strategic, financial, operational and organizational performance goals specific to the business or organizational unit for which the NEO was responsible, as well as the NEO’s leadership skills and current and expected contributions to the business.
ForIn determining the fiscal 2021, in light of the significant accomplishments by2023 IPF for each NEO, in leading histhe HRCC took into consideration: (i) financial performance, which exceeded threshold performance on non-GAAP adjusted EPS, (ii) results on the corporate scorecard and associated goals, (iii) the leadership team’s ability to guide Applied through continued external challenges including the continued challenging geopolitical and macroeconomic environment, and (iv) each executive’s capable leadership of their respective organization,business unit or function, and in Mr. Dickerson’s case, of Applied and in recognition of the significant teamwork required of the leadership team to deliver strong financial results despite navigating the continued unprecedented challenges of a global pandemic,overall. Based on this review, the HRCC determined that an IPF somewhat above target would be appropriate for fiscal 2023. In consideration of the individual accomplishments noted below, the HRCC assigned an IPF of 1.1 for each NEO ranging between 1.0 and 1.25.
NEO.
The following table shows the highlights of each NEO’s performance in fiscal 20212023 that the HRCC considered in determining their respective IPFs.
NEO | Fiscal | |||
Gary E. Dickerson |
| »Led Applied to record performance for the year, growing revenue | ||
»Guided the Company in making significant and sustainable improvements in our operations and supply chain and to identify critical long-term partnerships and investments, including the EPIC center | ||||
»Drove the | ||||
»Positioned Applied as one of the | ||||
Brice Hill | »Delivered annual revenue of $26.5 billion and non-GAAP adjusted EPS of $8.05 and distributed over $3.16 billion to shareholders, including $2.2 billion in share repurchases and $975 million in dividends | |||
| »Successfully managed external investor relationships and communications | |||
»Oversaw several key support functions, including Global Information Services and Global Indirect Procurement Services, driving enterprise enablement | ||||
Prabu G. Raja |
| »Delivered record annual performance with Semiconductor Systems revenue the Company’s highest estimated market share in the last twenty years | ||
»Demonstrated strong momentum in key growth areas, specifically etch, | ||||
foundry-logic | ||||
|
|
| ||
driving technology roadmap for our ICAPS business | ||||
|
| »Identified disruptive opportunities and developed | ||
»Continued to identify external | ||||
»Led the Applied Ventures |
| 44 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
| NEO | Fiscal 2023 Individual Performance Highlights | |||
Timothy M. Deane | »Delivered record Applied Global Services revenues of over $5.7 billion | |||
|
| |||
|
service revenues, with a 90% renewal rate for these subscriptions |
Actual Bonus Payouts. The diagramillustration below shows the results for each of the three key steps in determining the NEOs’ fiscal 20212023 annual incentive bonuses. As a result ofbonuses under the Bonus Plan. Reflecting our exceptionalrecord financial performance achievement of most of our fiscal 2021 corporate scorecard objectives, and significant individual contributions by the NEOs, bonus payouts for our NEOs were, on average, approximately 30% above104% of target bonus amounts.
Fiscal 20212023 Annual Incentive Calculation
| Performance Measures |
| Fiscal | ||||||||||
Initial Performance Hurdle | Fiscal 2023 non-GAAP adjusted EPS of $6.00 |
| Achieved non-GAAP adjusted EPS of $8.05 | |||||||||
Corporate Scorecard |
| |||||||||||
 |
»Products and Growth
»Customers and Markets »People and Organization |  |
Scorecard resultsachieved in a range from varying weighting of objectives | |||||||||
Individual Performance Modifier
|
|
|
| |||||||||
 | ||||||||||||
| Average NEO bonus, as of target: 1.04 | |||||||||||
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 45 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The following table shows for each NEO: (1) the bonus-eligible base salary, (2) the target bonus amount expressed as a percentage of base salary, (3) the target bonus expressed as a dollar amount and (4) the actual fiscal 20212023 bonus amount approved by the HRCC and paid to the NEO.
| NEO | (1) Base Salary ($) | (2) Target Salary (%) | (3) Target Bonus ($) | (4) Actual Bonus ($) | ||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | $ | 1,030,000 |
| 150% | $ | 1,545,000 |
| $ | 2,039,400 |
| ||||
Prabu G. Raja | $ | 650,000 |
| 135% | $ | 877,500 |
| $ | 1,195,703 |
| ||||
Ali Salehpour | $ | 645,000 |
| 135% | $ | 870,750 |
| $ | 974,152 |
| ||||
Om Nalamasu | $ | 550,000 |
| 120% | $ | 660,000 |
| $ | 848,513 |
| ||||
Robert J. Halliday(1) | $ | 265,417 |
| 88% | $ | 234,563 |
| $ | 351,844 |
| ||||
|
| NEO | (1) Base Salary ($) | (2) Target (%) | (3) Target ($) | (4) Actual ($) | ||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | $ | 1,030,000 | 150% | $ | 1,545,000 | $ | 1,631,520 | |||||||||
Brice Hill | $ | 715,000 | 135% | $ | 965,250 | $ | 1,019,304 | |||||||||
Prabu G. Raja | $ | 750,000 | 135% | $ | 1,012,500 | $ | 1,091,475 | |||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu | $ | 630,000 | 120% | $ | 756,000 | $ | 742,203 | |||||||||
Timothy M. Deane | $ | 600,000 | 120% | $ | 720,000 | $ | 733,590 | |||||||||
Pay Driven by Operating Performance.Rigor in Annual Bonus Program. Our process for determiningof establishing challenging financial and operating objectives under the annual bonus awardsprogram has resulted in strong pay and performance alignment.judicious payouts during a period of significant growth for the Company. The chart below shows the actual annual bonus awards to our CEO as a percentage of his target bonus opportunity and our non-GAAP adjusted EPS achievements over the last five fiscal years.
CEO Actual Annual Bonus vs. Earnings Per Share
Non-GAAP Adjusted Earnings Per Share $7.00 $6.00 $5.00 $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 $0.00 Actual Annual Bonus as % of Target Actual Annual Bonus as % of Target Non-GAAP Adjusted Earnings Per Share 132% 72% 55% 116% 132% FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 150% 125% 100% 75% 50% 25% 0%
Non-GAAP adjusted EPS is a performance target under our bonus plan.the Bonus Plan. See Appendix A for non-GAAP reconciliations.
| 46 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Long-Term Incentives
Overview. Applied’s long-term incentive compensation program is intended to help (1) focus participants on achieving our business objectives, (2) attract, retain and motivate key talent, and (3) align our executives’ interests with shareholders’ interests to maximize long-term shareholder value.
Timing of Awards. The HRCC grants long-term incentive awards to our NEOs under our shareholder-approved Employee
Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Plan”). The HRCC has not granted, nor does it intend to grant, equity awards in anticipation of the release of material, nonpublic information that is likely to result in changes to the price of our common stock, such as a significant positive or negative earnings announcement. Similarly, Applied has not timed, nor does it intend to time, the release of material, nonpublic information based on equity award grant dates.
Fiscal 20212023 Equity Awards
The HRCC believes that a meaningful portion of our NEOs’ target compensation should be in the form of long-term incentives. These awards are intended to reward performance over a multi-year period, align the interests of executives with those of shareholders, instill an ownership culture, enhance the personal stake of executive officers in the growth and success of the Company and provide an incentive for continued service at the Company.
Given theour shareholders’ ongoing strong support received from our shareholders onof our incentive programs, last year, we continued our approach to makeof making performance-based equity awards a substantial portion of the overall value of equity awards granted to our NEOs.
The fiscal 20212023 long-term incentive awards for NEOs (excluding Mr. Halliday who did not receive any equity awards during fiscal 2021) consist of two forms of equity vehicles: performance share units and restricted stock units. The target vehicle mix of the awards for the fiscal 20212023 grant remainsremained unchanged from the previous year’s grants and consistsconsisted of 75% PSUs and 25% RSUs for the CEO and 50% PSUs and 50% RSUs for the other NEOs. This does not include the Value Creation Awards, which are discussed beginning on page 39.
| CEO LTI Vehicle Mix | All Other NEO LTI Vehicle Mix | |
|
| |
For fiscal 2021,2023, in December 2020,2022, the HRCC grantedapproved the target award values, which were converted to the corresponding number of PSUs and RSUs, listed in the below table tofor our NEOs. The awards shown for Mr. Durn were forfeited in connection with his departure.
| NEO | | Target Value of Awards(1) ($) |
| | Equivalent Target Number of PSUs(2) | | Equivalent Number of RSUs(2) | |||||
Dickerson | $ | 14,025,000 |
|
| 122,169 |
|
| 40,723 |
| |||
Raja | $ | 4,275,000 |
|
| 24,826 |
|
| 24,826 |
| |||
Salehpour | $ | 4,025,000 |
|
| 23,374 |
|
| 23,374 |
| |||
Nalamasu | $ | 2,700,000 |
|
| 15,680 |
|
| 15,680 |
| |||
Durn | $ | 4,750,000 |
|
| 27,585 |
|
| 27,585 |
|
| NEO | Target Value ($) | Equivalent Target Number of PSUs(2) | Equivalent Number of RSUs(2) | |||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | $ | 20,500,000 | 140,578 | 46,860 | ||||||||
Brice Hill | $ | 5,000,000 | 22,859 | 22,859 | ||||||||
Prabu G. Raja | $ | 6,000,000 | 27,430 | 27,430 | ||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu | $ | 3,650,000 | 16,687 | 16,687 | ||||||||
Timothy M. Deane | $ | 2,800,000 | 12,801 | 12,801 | ||||||||
| (1) | Reflects target |
| (2) | Number of units calculated by dividing allocated portion of target value of awards by |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 47 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Size of Performance-BasedFiscal 2023 Equity Awards.Awards. In determining the size of the awards,target award values, the HRCC considered each NEO’s award as a component of histheir total direct compensation. Target fiscal 20212023 long-term equity awards were determined in light of each NEO’s scope of responsibility, performance, impact on results, and expected future contributions to our business, compensation levels relative to other Applied officers, the need to attract and retain talent and business conditions. In addition, theThe fiscal 20212023 target award sizes providedvalues were set to provide sufficient performance-based equity incentives to align compensation with the long-term interests of our shareholders, werecompensate the NEOs in line with market norms for the NEOs’their respective roles and were sufficient to provide them with appropriate incentive for them to achieve Applied’s performance goals over a multi-year period.
Performance Share Units.Units. The PSU awards are designed to align NEO compensation – and therefore NEO decision making – with achievement of our strategic goals over the long term. The two metrics offor the PSU portion of the long-term incentive program remain unchanged from the prior year’s grants. The fiscal 20212023 PSUs, granted in December 2020, will2022, are eligible to vest three years from the grant date based on achievement of an average non-GAAP adjusted operating margin goal for fiscal 20212023 through fiscal 20232025 and based on TSR relative to the S&P 500 over the performance period of the first day of fiscal 20212023 through the last day of fiscal 2023,2025, with equal weighting given to each metric. The HRCC selected the members of the S&P 500 indexIndex as the peer set for the relative TSR metric because enough differences exist between Applied and other companies in the technology and/or semiconductor space to make identifying a comparable industry-specific peer group impractical and because the HRCC believes the S&P 500 represents an appropriate proxy for the investment alternatives available to the Company’s shareholders.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FY21 Long-Term Incentive Plan Metrics Relative TSR 3-year average captures the full scale of our business and greater incentives management to outperform the market in any business environment 50% Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Margin 3-year average reflects an important measure of profitability, value creation, and the ability of management to improve operational efficiency over time. It is also a key metric for our shareholders. 50%
The number of PSUs that will vest, if any, will be based on the achievement of threshold, (minimum required for a payout), target or maximum levels for each metric, and can range from 50% to 200% of the target number of shares, as set forth below.
| ||||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
| Percentage of Shares Eligible to Vest Based on | |||||||
| Achievement Level | Relative TSR | Operating Margin | ||||||
| Threshold | 0% | 50% | ||||||
| Target | 100% | 100% | ||||||
| Maximum | 200% | 200% | ||||||
AConsistent with prior performance periods, a TSR payout factor will be determined by calculating the Company’s TSR percentile rank within the S&P 500, with threshold, target and maximum levels based on Applied’s TSR ranking of aboveat the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile, respectively, of the S&P 500. The TSR calculation uses a 60-day trailing average stock price at the beginning and end of the performance period for measurement purposes. This approach minimizes the impact of a single beginning and ending point stock price for each performance cycle.
If the threshold level is not achieved for either metric, then no corresponding shares will vest. If achievement falls between threshold and target or target and maximum levels, the portion of the award that would vest will be determined based on straight-line interpolation.
| 48 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
In setting goals for the PSUs, the HRCC considered Applied’s historical results and relative performance, and established goals that are aligned with Applied’s financial and strategic objectives and will require significant effortexceptional results to achieve the maximum level.
Restricted Stock Units. The RSU awards are scheduled to vest ratably over three years, providing a link to shareholder value creation and maintaining retention value.
Retirement Provisions. The fiscal 20212023 PSU and RSU awards are subject to retirement provisions which, in the event of a qualifying retirement based on age and years of service, provide for the potential of a partial payout of the PSU awards based on actual performance at the conclusion of the three-year performance period and partial accelerated vesting of RSU awards. The retirement vesting provisions are designed to maintain engagement and focus, as well as to provide a retention incentive, for our executive officers when they approach potential retirement decisions.
Restricted Stock Units. The RSU awards are scheduled to vest ratably over three years, providing a link to shareholder value creationPerformance and maintaining retention value.
Payout offor Fiscal 20192021 Performance Share Unit Awards
The PSUs granted to our NEOs in fiscal 20192021 were scheduledeligible to vest three years fromafter the grant dateconclusion of a three-year performance period, based on achievement of an average non-GAAP adjusted operating margin goal for fiscal 20192021 through fiscal 20212023 and relative TSR percentile rank within the S&P 500 for fiscal 20192021 through fiscal 2021,2023, with equal weighting given to each metric. In setting the adjusted operating margin targetsperformance requirements for the PSUs, the HRCC considered a number of factors, including the Company’s past performance, analyst expectations, then-current and expected macro-economic forces, the spectrum of potential outcomes, and competitor positioning.practices. The number of PSUs that could vest was based on the achievement of threshold, (minimum required for a payout), target or maximum levels of each metric, and could range from 50% to 200% ofstraight-line interpolation for achievement that fell between the target number of shares.levels. The threshold, target and maximum levels and actual achievementresults achieved for each metric, as well as overallthe resulting payout factors for the fiscal 20192021 PSUs, are shown below.
| Three-Year Average |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three-Year Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metric | Threshold | Target | Max | Result | Payout | Threshold | Target | Max | Result | Payout Factor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Margin(1) |
| 25.2% |
|
| 27.2% |
|
| 31.9% |
|
| 27.2% |
|
| 99.17% |
| 25.3% | 27.3% | 30.3% | 30.4% | 200% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Relative TSR |
| 25th %ile |
| | 50th | | | 75th | | | 97th | |
| 200% |
| | 25th %ile |
| | 50th %ile |
| | 75th %ile |
| | 92nd %ile |
| 200% | ||||||||||||
Total |
| 149.6% |
|
|
|
|
| 200% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | See Appendix A for a reconciliation of non-GAAP adjusted operating margin. |
The payoutactual number of the fiscal 20192021 PSUs earned for each NEO (with the exception of Mr. Halliday,Messrs. Hill and Deane, who waswere not an executive officerofficers and did not receive PSUs in fiscal 2019, and Mr. Durn who forfeited his award in connection with his departure)2021) is shown below.
| NEO | | Target Number of PSUs | | Number of PSUs Earned | ||||
Dickerson |
| 256,090 |
|
| 383,111 |
| ||
Raja |
| 42,682 |
|
| 63,853 |
| ||
Salehpour |
| 58,014 |
|
| 86,789 |
| ||
Nalamasu |
| 30,731 |
|
| 45,973 |
|
| NEO | Target Number of PSUs | Number of PSUs Earned | ||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | 122,169 | 244,338 | ||||||
Prabu G. Raja | 24,826 | 49,652 | ||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu | 15,680 | 31,360 | ||||||
Value Creation AwardsApplied Global Services Leadership Compensation
DuringIn September 2022, Mr. Deane was appointed to lead Applied Global Services with no immediate change in his ongoing compensation but was granted a one-time RSU award with a grant date value of $1,000,000, vesting over a four-year period. In early fiscal 2020, the HRCC conducted a comprehensive review of the compensation for the Company’s senior executives, including the NEOs. As a result of that review, the HRCC determined that an incremental long-term performance-based award for certain key executives would
be appropriate, prudent and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Consequently, in December 2020,2023, the HRCC approved a non-recurring long-term PSU award (“Value Creation Award”)ongoing compensation for Mr. DickersonDeane commensurate with his new role, consisting of an initial annual base salary of $600,000; a target numberbonus opportunity of 116,145 PSUs with a value120% of $10 million based on Applied’s closing stock price on the grant date. The HRCC also approved Value Creation Awards for Mr. Durnhis base salary; and Dr. Raja, eachan annual long-term incentive award with a target number of 33,769 PSUs and a grant value of $3 million. Mr. Durn forfeited his award as a result$2,800,000, consisting of his departure.
The Value Creation Awards only deliver value to the executive officers to the extent that aggressive total shareholder return milestones are met during the five-year performance period ending on October 26, 2025 (“Performance Period”)50% RSUs and require the officers to remain employed through the end of the Performance Period. The total shareholder return milestones require significant stock price growth from Applied’s stock price on the grant date – which already represented the highest share price in the Company’s history.
Rationale. The decision to grant the Value Creation Awards reflected the Applied Board’s confidence in the Company’s strategy and leadership team. The Board believed that the technology industry was at an inflection point, which presented a range of unprecedented opportunities for our Company, and that Mr. Dickerson is the right executive to guide Applied, and Dr. Raja, the Semiconductor Products Group, to enable Applied to take full advantage of these opportunities to grow shareholder value.
The Value Creation Awards were also made in acknowledgement of the extremely competitive market for proven executive talent among our direct peers as well as broader technology companies, as underscored by Mr. Durn’s subsequent departure. The HRCC believed that the awards were an appropriate step to mitigate the potential risks to Applied posed by having to replace any of these key leaders over the next several years.
Finally, the HRCC designed the Value Creation Awards to directly align the officers’ interests50% PSUs, consistent with the long-term interests of our shareholders by delivering value only if Applied’s stock price growth – having achieved the then-highest stock price in the Company’s history on the grant date – and dividends paid, exceed hurdles that were set at levels that the HRCC believed would be very challenging to achieve and would represent exceptional performance if accomplished.
Award Design. With input from its independent compensation consultant, the HRCC considered a number of potential award designs and performance measures before ultimately approving the Value Creation Awards. The HRCC designed the Value Creation Awards to:
The HRCC also acknowledged that while the Value Creation Awards provide incentive and retention value, they represent only one component of the compensationequity mix for Mr. Dickerson and Dr. Raja. As a result, the HRCC believed that it was appropriate to tie the Value Creation Awards solely to Applied’s TSR performance, rather than relative TSR results or operational metrics, as these important measures are already incorporated into the ongoing executive compensation program.
Potential payout under the Value Creation Awards is based on achievement of specified levels of total shareholder return (“TSR Hurdle”) during the five-year Performance Period. The TSR Hurdle is calculated as Applied’s average closing stock price for any consecutive 20 trading days during the Performance Period, plus dividends paid during the Performance Period. The HRCC selected a 20-day average to ensure that payouts are based on the achievement of sustained stock price performance. The Value Creation Awards will only be earned if Applied achieves a significant increase in TSR during the five-year Performance Period. Additionally, as share-based awards, any value delivered to the officers will depend not only on the number of units earned but also on Applied’s share price at the end of the Performance Period when the awards vest. In other words, if Applied’s stock price decreases, the value of any award realized by participants similarly declines. Finally, the awards require the executives to remain employed with the Company through the end of the five-year Performance Period, except in the event of involuntary termination of employment without cause, death or following a change of control.
In determining the magnitude of the Value Creation Awards, the HRCC considered the value of the target number of PSUs at the time of grant, including when prorated over the Performance Period, as well as the potential future value of the PSUs assuming achievement at various performance levels. The HRCC evaluated the awards in the context of the executives’ overall compensation levels among their counterparts at peer companies, award values for similar non-recurring, long-term incentive awards among executives at other large technology companies, and annual award values approved by the HRCC for the officers. The awards were set at magnitudes that the HRCC believed would provide sufficient incentive for participants to achieve the challenging performance hurdles but that would keep their overall compensation – including the prorated value of the Value Creation Awards – at market-competitive levels.
Performance Goals. The actual number of PSUs that may be earned by each officer ranges from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs based on achievement of the TSR Hurdles
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
shown below. If the threshold TSR Hurdle of $104.40 is not achieved, then no PSUs will vest. If the actual TSR achievement falls between the pre-defined levels, the portion of the award that may vest will be determined based on straight-line interpolation. Any PSUs earned shall vest in full at the end of the Performance Period, subject to continued employment through the vesting date. The vesting requirement would be modified in the event of involuntary termination of employment without cause, death or following a change of control, prior to the end of the Performance Period.
For purposes of determining the hurdles for the Value Creation Awards, TSR was measured as the increase in the market price of our common stock plus cash dividends paid on a per share basis as compared to the base price of $76.94 (the “Baseline Price”), which represents the average closing price of Applied’s common stock during the 20-trading day period ending on December 3, 2020.
| Performance Modifier | TSR Hurdle | TSR % vs. Baseline Price | ||
50% | $104.40 | 36% | ||
100% | $119.40 | 55% | ||
150% | $129.40 | 68% | ||
200% | $144.40 | 88% |
The HRCC believes that the TSR Hurdles were set at challenging levels, that require successful execution of our long-term strategy and the creation of significant incremental shareholder value.
From December 3, 2020 (the grant date of Mr. Dickerson’s award) through the last trading day of calendar 2021, Applied’s highest 20-day average closing stock price was $152.85 – above the maximum hurdle even before considering the impact of dividends paid to shareholders. This represents a stock price increase of 77.5% from the closing price on December 3, 2020 and an increase of approximately $57 billion in the Company’s market capitalization.
The chart below illustrates the TSR Hurdles corresponding to the 100% and 200% modifiers, compared to Applied’s stock trading history during the ten years preceding the grant date.
Value Creation Awards TSR Hurdles vs. Applied’s Stock Trading History
Maximum: $144.40 TSR Hurdle Target: $119.40 TSR Hurdle Baseline Price 1 Highest 20-Day Average Prior to Nov-2020 AMAT Daily Closing Price Jan-2012 Jun-2014 Nov-2016 Apr-2019 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 $120 $130 $140$150
120-Day Average as of Dec-2020 when the awards were approved by the HRCC.
The HRCC views the Value Creation Awards as an important, non-recurring supplement to the ongoing compensation program and does not expect to grant any similar awards in the coming years.non-CEO NEOs.
Interim CFO Compensation PackageDiscussion and Analysis
In September 2021, Mr. Halliday was appointed as the Company’s interim Chief Financial Officer. In determining Mr. Halliday’s compensation package for the role, the HRCC considered a number of factors, including the expected duration of Mr. Halliday’s service in the role (making long-term incentive awards an impractical component of compensation) and the competitive market for senior finance talent.
After considering these factors, the HRCC approved a compensation package for Mr. Halliday consisting of: base salary at an annual rate of $710,000; a target bonus of 135% of his base salary under the Bonus Plan prorated for his service as interim CFO; and a cash bonus of $2,000,000 to be paid to Mr. Halliday if he remains the Company’s interim CFO through the date on which a permanent CFO commences service with the Company or if his employment is earlier terminated by the Company without cause or as a result of his death or disability.
Role and Authority of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee
The HRCC has a written charter approved by the Board that specifies the HRCC’s duties and responsibilities, which is available on our website at:
http: https://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/investor-relations/governance-documents.us/en/about/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-documents.html#Documents. In accordance with its charter, the HRCC oversees our programs that foster executive and employee development and retention, with an emphasis on leadership development, management capabilities, succession plans, company culture and human capital management. The HRCC also determines executive and director compensation, and oversees significant employee benefits programs, policies and plans.
Each member of the HRCC has been determined by the Board to be independent under Nasdaq and SEC rules. The HRCC may delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees. See “Board Meetings and Committees” on page 1524 for more information about the HRCC.
Role of Compensation Consultant
The HRCC has the authority to engage independent advisors to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities. For fiscal 2021,2023, the HRCC engaged Semler Brossy Consulting Group (“Semler Brossy”) as its independent executive compensation consultant. Semler Brossy, who reports directly to the HRCC and not to management, is independent from Applied, has not provided any services to Applied other than to the HRCC and
receives compensation from Applied only for services provided to the HRCC. The HRCC assessed the independence of Semler Brossy pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that the work of Semler Brossy for the HRCC has not raised any conflict of interest.
Semler Brossy reviews and advises on all principal aspects of the executive compensation program. Its main responsibilities are as follows:
Advise on alignment of pay and performance; |
Review and advise on executive total compensation, including base salaries, short- and long-term incentives, associated performance goals and retention and severance arrangements; |
Advise on trends in executive compensation; |
Provide recommendations regarding the composition of our peer group; |
Analyze market compensation practices based on peer group proxy statements, compensation survey data and other publicly available data; and |
Perform any special projects requested by the HRCC. |
The HRCC typically asks Semler Brossy to attend the HRCC’s meetings, including executive sessions at which management is not present. Semler Brossy communicates regularly with the HRCC Chair outside of committee meetings and also meets with management to gather information and review proposals.
Role of Executive Officers and Management in Compensation Decisions
In fiscal 2021,2023, the HRCC invited Mr. Dickerson (as CEO) and other executives, including the headsrepresentatives of Global Human Resources and Global Rewards, to attend its meetings. The HRCC also regularly held executive sessions without management present. The CEO, together with the HRCC, assesses the performance of our NEOs and other executive officers. The CEO presents to the HRCC his evaluation of each executive officer’s performance over the past year and makes recommendations to the HRCC regarding base salaries, bonus targets and actual payments, performance goals and weightings, and long-term incentive awards for executive officers. The HRCC considers these recommendations in making its final determinations, in addition to considering input from Semler Brossy. The HRCC discusses the CEO’s compensation and makes final decisions regarding the CEO’s compensation when he is not present.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Additional Compensation Programs and Policies
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan
Our 2016 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”) allows our NEOs and other eligible employees to voluntarily defer on a pre-tax basis a portion of their eligible earnings. We do not provide matching or other employer contributions to our executive officers under this plan. Deferrals made prior to October 2015 under the DCP are credited with deemed interest and are subject to the distribution rules in place prior to the plan amendment in October 2015. Beginning in fiscal 2016, participants are permitted to notionally invest new deferrals in certain investment options available under the plan. Additionally, for new deferrals, the DCP provides distribution rules for in-service distributions or upon a qualifying separation from service, an elected future date, disability and change in control. See “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” below for more information about the DCP.
Retirement and Other Benefits
During fiscal 2021,2023, all full-time and part-time (working 20 or more hours a week) U.S. employees, including the NEOs, were eligible to participate in Applied’s 401(k) plan, a tax-qualified retirement plan. Eligible Applied 401(k) plan participants receive matching contributions from Applied. Other than the 401(k) plan, weWe do not provide defined benefit pension plans or, other than the 401(k) plan and the DCP, defined contribution retirement plans to the NEOs or other employees, except as required in certain countries outside the U.S. for legal or competitive reasons. Applied offers a number of other benefits programs to a broad base of eligible employees, including a tax-qualified employee stock purchase plan, medical, dental and vision insurance, long-term and short-term disability plans, life and accidental death and dismemberment plans, health and dependent care flexible spending accounts, business travel insurance, wellness programs, educational assistance, employee assistance program and certain other country-specific benefits.
Applied annually benchmarks its overall benefits programs, including the 401(k) plan, against those of our peers. Applied’s overall broad-based benefits programs are consistent with market practice, which the HRCC believes allows us to remain competitive in attracting and retaining talent.
Applied maintains a relocation program available to all eligible employees that is consistent with current practices among large global companies. Applied provides competitive relocation benefits to ensure it can fill positions critical to its business needs and provide career development opportunities for high-potential employees. During fiscal 2023, the Company provided Mr. Hill with benefits to support his relocation to the Bay Area. Given the timing of Mr. Hill’s relocation, a portion of the expenses will be incurred in, and reported for, fiscal 2024. Until his relocation, the Company paid for Mr Hill’s travel from his home in Oregon to the Company’s headquarters in Santa Clara, California. While these travel costs and relocation benefits are required to be disclosed as compensation for Mr. Hill, we do not consider them to be a personal benefit.
The safety and security of the Company’s CEO are important to Applied’s continued success. DuringBased on the recommendations from a previously-conducted third-party security risk assessment, during fiscal 2021,2023, the HRCC approved the installationcosts for equipment and monitoring and maintenance services of a residential security system and related monitoring and maintenance services, as well asfor Mr. Dickerson. The HRCC also approved costs for ancillary personaltravel-related security services for Mr. Dickerson. WhileDickerson’s family, in response to the costs of these services are required to be disclosed as compensation for Mr. Dickerson, we do not consider these security measures to be a personal benefit.heightened geopolitical risk environment. The HRCC will
continue to review the nature and cost of any future security provided tofor Mr. Dickerson.
The value of the benefits provided under the programs discussed above are not considered by the HRCC in determining an individual NEO’s total compensation.
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 51 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Stock Ownership Guidelines
We have stock ownership guidelines to help align the interests of our Section 16 officers on the CEO Executive StaffLeadership Team with those of our shareholders. The guidelines provide that officers should meet the following ownership levels of Applied common stock:
Unearned performance awards and unexercised options (or portions thereof) are not included for purposes of satisfying the guidelines. Officers may not sell any shares of Applied stock if their ownership is, or following the sale would fall, below the applicable guideline following ownership levels:
Position | Ownership Level | |
CEO | 6x base salary | |
Other Officers | 3x base salary | |
Unearned performance awards are not included for purposes of satisfying the sale.guidelines.
As of December 31, 2021,2023, all of our officers were in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines.
Hedging and Pledging Prohibitions
Applied has an insider trading policy that, among other things, prohibits all of our employees (including officers) and directors from engaging in hedging or other speculative transactions relating to Applied shares. Prohibited transactions include short sales, derivative securities (such as put and call options, or other similar instruments) and other hedging transactions (such as equity swaps, prepaid variable forwards, or similar instruments), or any transactions that have, or are designed to have, the effect of hedging or offsetting any decrease in the market value of Applied securities. In addition, Section 16 officers and directors are prohibited from holding Applied securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging Applied securities as collateral for a loan.
ClawbackCompensation Recovery Policy
We have a Compensation Recovery Policy, adopted by the HRCC in fiscal 2023 (the “Recovery Policy”), that, in the event of an accounting restatement, requires reimbursement from a current or former Section 16 officer of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation received by them, regardless of any fault or misconduct by the officer. The compensation that may be recovered is the actual incentive-based compensation received by an officer minus the amount the officer would have received had such compensation been determined based on the restated financial statements, calculated on a pre-tax basis. The Recovery Policy applies to incentive-based compensation that is received by the Section 16 officer on or after October 2, 2023 and during the three fiscal years that ended immediately before the Company determines that it is required to restate its financial statements, and that is granted, earned or vested based wholly or in part on the achievement of any financial reporting measure or based on the Company’s stock price.
We also have a legacy “clawback” policy that applies to incentive compensation received by an officer before October 2, 2023. This policy allows the Board to require reimbursement of incentive compensation from an executive officer in the event that intentional misconduct by the officer is determined to be the primary cause of a material negative restatement of Applied’s financial results. The compensation that may be recovered is the after-tax portion of any bonus
paid to, and any performance-based equity awards earned by, the NEO within the 12 months after filing of the erroneous financial statements, if the compensation would not have been paid to the NEO had Applied’s financial results been reported properly. The policy applies to financial statements filed in a rolling three- year, look-back period. This clawback policy is
The policies described above are in addition to any policies or recovery rights that are required under applicable laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act.
Tax Deductibility
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, restricts deductibility for federal income tax purposes of annual individual compensation in excess of $1 million to each NEO, effective for tax years beginning after 2017, subject to a transition rule for certain written binding contracts which were in effect on November 2, 2017, and which were not modified in any material respect on or after such date. While the HRCC considers the deductibility of compensation as a factor in making compensation decisions, it retains the flexibility to provide compensation that is consistent with the Company’s goals for its executive compensation program, even if such compensation is not tax-deductible.
| 52 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Human Resources and Compensation Committee Report
Human Resources and Compensation Committee Report
The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Applied specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act.
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for fiscal 2021.2023. Based on the review and discussions, the Human Resources and Compensation
Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Applied’s Proxy Statement for its 20222024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
This report is submitted by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee.
Thomas J. Iannotti (Chair)
Rani Borkar
Xun (Eric) Chen
Alexander A. Karsner
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 53 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Executive Compensation
Executive Compensation
Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2021, 20202023, 2022 and 2019
2021
The following table shows compensation information for fiscal 2021, 20202023, 2022 and 20192021 for our NEOs.
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($)(1) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($)(2) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(3) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | | 2021 2020 2019 |
| | 1,049,808 1,030,000 1,024,808 |
| | — — — |
| | 31,710,469 14,299,176 11,696,506 |
| | 2,039,400 1,786,406 1,133,000 |
| | 465,882 179,405 218,081 | (4)
| | 35,265,559 17,294,987 14,072,395 |
| |||||||
Robert J. Halliday(5) | 2021 | 268,500 | — | — | 351,844 | | 57,872 | (6) | 678,216 | |||||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn(7) | | 2021 2020 2019 |
| | 681,635 625,000 620,673 |
| | — — — |
| | 9,932,231 4,459,552 3,931,029 |
| | — 975,586 580,078 |
| | 75,104 13,893 13,620 | (8)
| | 10,688,970 6,074,031 5,145,400 |
| |||||||
Prabu G. Raja | | 2021 2020 2019 |
| | 648,135 567,000 564,058 |
| | — — — |
| | 9,400,928 3,359,304 2,892,132 |
| | 1,195,703 923,324 430,948 |
| | 75,070 17,842 16,464 | (9)
| | 11,319,836 4,867,470 3,903,602 |
| |||||||
Ali Salehpour | | 2021 2020 2019 |
| | 653,942 625,000 620,673 |
| | — — — |
| | 4,501,365 4,247,422 3,931,029 |
| | 974,152 774,984 411,750 |
| | 74,396 16,194 12,730 | (10)
| | 6,203,855 5,663,600 4,976,182 |
| |||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu(11) | 2021 | 552,789 | — | 3,019,654 | 848,513 | | 63,916 | (12) | 4,484,872 | |||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($)(1) | Bonus ($)(2) | Stock ($)(3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | | 2023 2022 2021 | | | 1,030,000 1,030,000 1,049,808 | | | — — — | | | 23,951,048 17,783,334 31,710,469 | (6) | | 1,631,520 1,358,055 2,039,400 | | | 241,976 228,583 465,882 | (5) | | 26,854,544 20,399,972 35,265,559 | | |||||||
Brice Hill(7) Financial Officer and Global Information Services | | 2023 2022 | | | 708,846 441,346 | | | — 2,000,000 | | | 5,530,849 8,351,018 | | | 1,019,304 523,723 | | | 324,136 58,343 | (8) | | 7,583,135 11,374,430 | | |||||||
Prabu G. Raja | | 2023 2022 2021 | | | 740,000 679,615 648,135 | | | — — — | | | 6,636,826 5,372,622 9,400,928 | (6) | | 1,091,475 819,791 1,195,703 | | | 18,073 18,682 75,070 | (9) | | 8,486,374 6,890,710 11,319,836 | | |||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu | | 2023 2022 2021 | | | 625,385 592,308 552,789 | | | — — — | | | 4,037,503 3,727,899 3,019,654 | | | 742,203 568,080 848,513 | | | 3,718 4,543 63,916 | (10) | | 5,408,809 4,892,830 4,484,872 | | |||||||
Timothy M. Deane(11) | | 2023 2022 | | | 574,947 433,350 | | | — — | | | 3,097,266 2,807,119 | | | 733,590 412,458 | | | 17,761 16,703 | (12) | | 4,423,564 3,669,630 | | |||||||
| (1) | Applied’s fiscal 2023 and 2022 each contained 52 weeks, and fiscal 2021 contained 53 |
| (2) | Amount shown for Mr. Hill reflects a sign-on bonus, which is subject to pro-rata repayment if Mr. Hill voluntarily resigns or the Company terminates his employment for cause prior to completing 24 months of employment. |
| (3) | Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the executive officer. Instead, the amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of target stock awards granted in the respective fiscal years, as determined pursuant to ASC 718 (but excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures for performance-based awards). For fiscal |
Amounts consist of payouts earned under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan for services rendered in the respective fiscal |
Amount includes (a) Applied’s matching contribution of |
Amounts shown for Mr. Dickerson and Dr. Raja for fiscal 2021 include the grant date fair value of the non-recurring performance-based Value Creation Awards granted to them in December of 2020. |
| (7) | Mr. |
Amount consists of (a) Applied’s matching contribution of |
|
|
| (9) | Amount consists of (a) Applied’s matching contribution of |
| (10) | ||
Amount consists of (a) Applied’s payment on behalf of Dr. Nalamasu of $1,068 in term life insurance premiums, (b) Applied’s matching contribution of $2,500 to an eligible non-profit organization pursuant to a program under the Applied Materials, Inc. |
Mr. Deane was not an NEO in fiscal 2021. |
| (12) | Amount consists of (a) Applied’s matching contribution of |
|
|
| 54 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Executive Compensation
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 2021
2023
The following table shows all plan-based awards granted to the NEOs during fiscal 2021.2023.
Estimated Possible Payouts |
Estimated Future Payouts | All Other (#) | Grant ($)(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | | 12/3/2020 12/3/2020 12/3/2020 — |
| | — — — 0 |
| | — — — 1,545,000 |
| | — — — 4,635,000 |
| | 61,085 — 58,073 — |
| | 122,169 — 116,145 — |
| | 244,338 — 232,290 — |
| | — 40,723 — — |
| | 13,280,967 3,415,438 15,014,064 — |
(4)
| |||||||||
Robert J. Halliday | — | 0 | 234,563 | 703,668 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn(5) | | 12/3/2020 12/3/2020 12/4/2020 — |
| | — — — 0 |
| | — — — 958,500 |
| | — — — 2,875,500 |
| | 13,793 — 16,885 — |
| | 27,585 — 33,769 — |
| | 55,170 — 67,538 — |
| | — 27,585 — — |
| | 2,998,740 2,313,554 4,619,937 — |
(4)
| |||||||||
Prabu G. Raja | | 12/3/2020 12/3/2020 12/4/2020 — |
| | — — — 0 |
| | — — — 877,500 |
| | — — — 2,632,500 |
| | 12,413 — 16,885 — |
| | 24,826 — 33,769 — |
| | 49,652 — 67,538 — |
| | — 24,826 — — |
| | 2,698,834 2,082,157 4,619,937 — |
(4)
| |||||||||
Ali Salehpour | | 12/3/2020 12/3/2020 — |
| | — — 0 |
| | — — 870,750 |
| | — — 2,612,250 |
| | 11,687 — — |
| | 23,374 — — |
| | 46,748 — — |
| | — 23,374 — |
| | 2,540,988 1,960,377 — |
| |||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu | | 12/3/2020 12/3/2020 — |
| | — — 0 |
| | — — 660,000 |
| | — — 1,980,000 |
| | 7,840 — — |
| | 15,680 — — |
| | 31,360 — — |
| | — 15,680 — |
| | 1,704,573 1,315,082 — |
| |||||||||
| Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | All Other | Grant | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | | 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 — | | | — — 0 | | | — — 1,545,000 | | | — — 4,635,000 | | | 35,145 — — | | | 140,578 — — | | | 281,156 — — | | | — 46,860 — | | | 18,919,690 5,031,358 — | | |||||||||
Brice Hill | | 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 — | | | — — 0 | | | — — 965,250 | | | — — 2,895,750 | | | 5,715 — — | | | 22,859 — — | | | 45,718 — — | | | — 22,859 — | | | 3,076,479 2,454,371 — | | |||||||||
Prabu G. Raja | | 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 — | | | — — 0 | | | — — 1,012,500 | | | — — 3,037,500 | | | 6,858 — — | | | 27,430 — — | | | 54,860 — — | | | — 27,430 — | | | 3,691,667 2,945,159 — | | |||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu | | 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 — | | | — — 0 | | | — — 756,000 | | | — — 2,268,000 | | | 4,172 — — | | | 16,687 — — | | | 33,374 — — | | | — 16,687 — | | | 2,245,820 1,791,683 — | | |||||||||
Timothy M. Deane | | 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 — | | | — — 0 | | | — — 720,000 | | | — — 2,160,000 | | | 3,200 — — | | | 12,801 — — | | | 25,602 — — | | | — 12,801 — | | | 1,722,823 1,374,443 — | | |||||||||
| (1) | Amounts shown were estimated possible payouts for fiscal |
| (2) | Additional information on the equity awards can be found under “Fiscal |
| (3) | Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the NEOs. Instead, the amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards as determined pursuant to ASC 718 (but excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures for performance-based awards). The assumptions used to calculate the awards’ value are set forth in Note |
|
|
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 55 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2021 2023 Year-End
The following table shows all outstanding equity awards held by the NEOs at the end of fiscal 2021.2023.
| Stock Awards(1) | |||||||||||||||||
| Name | Number
(#) | Market
($)(2) | Equity
(#) | Equity ($)(2) | |||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | | 13,575
— — — — | (3) (4) (5)
| | 1,782,398
— — — — |
| | — — —
122,169 116,145 78,973 140,578 |
(6) (7) (8) (9) | | — — —
|
| |||||
| | 47,532 22,859 — | |||||||||||||||
(11) | | 6,240,952 3,001,387 — | |||||||||||||||
| | — — 22,859 | (9) | | — — 3,001,387 | | |||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja | | 8,276
— — — — | (3)
(13)
| | 1,086,639
— — — — |
| | — — —
24,826 33,769 16,725 27,430 |
(14)
(8)
| | — — —
|
| |||||
| | 5,227
— — — | (3) (16) (17)
| | 686,305
— — — |
| | — — —
|
(18)
(8) (9) | | — — —
|
| |||||
| | 3,534
6,817 10,663 12,801 — | (19) (20)
|
(24)
| | 464,014
895,072 1,400,052 1,680,771 —
|
| | — — —
12,801 |
| | — — —
1,680,771 |
| ||||
| (1) | Stock awards consist of |
| (2) | Market value was determined by multiplying the number of such shares by the closing price of Applied common stock of |
| (3) | RSUs were granted on December |
| (4) | RSUs were granted on December |
| (5) | RSUs were granted on December |
| (6) | PSUs were granted on December |
| ||
| 56 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Executive Compensation
|
PSUs were granted on December 3, 2020. The shares are scheduled to vest on October 26, 2025, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals. The number of shares shown is the target amount, and the actual number of shares that may vest ranges from 0% to 200% of the target amount, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals. |
|
|
|
|
| (10) | RSUs were granted on March 7, 2022. Of these, 23,766 shares are scheduled to vest on each of April 1, 2024 and April 1, 2025. |
| (11) | RSUs were granted on December 12, 2022. Of these, 7,619 shares vested on December 19, 2023 and 7,620 shares are scheduled to vest on each of December 19, 2024 and December 19, 2025. |
| (12) | RSUs were granted on December 2, 2021. Of these, 5,575 shares vested on December 19, 2023 and 5,575 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, |
| (13) | RSUs were granted on December 12, 2022. Of these, 9,143 shares vested on December 19, 2023, 9,143 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2024 and 9,144 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2025. |
| (14) | PSUs were granted on December |
| (15) | PSUs were granted on December 4, 2020. The shares are scheduled to vest on October 26, 2025, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals. The number of shares shown is the target amount, and the actual number of shares that may vest ranges from 0% to 200% of the target amount, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals. |
| (16) | RSUs were granted on December |
| (17) | RSUs were granted on December |
| (18) | PSUs were granted on December |
| (19) | RSUs were granted on December |
| (20) | RSUs were granted on December 3, 2020. Of these, |
| (21) |
|
| (22) | RSUs were granted on December 16, 2021. Of these, 1,363 shares vested on January 1, 2024, 2,045 shares are scheduled to vest on January 1, 2025 and 3,409 shares are scheduled to vest on January 1, 2026. |
| (23) | RSUs were granted on September 8, 2022. Of these, 2,132 shares are scheduled to vest on October 1, 2024, 3,199 shares are scheduled to vest on October 1, 2025 and 5,332 shares are scheduled to vest on October 1, 2026. |
| (24) | RSUs were granted on December 12, 2022. Of these, 4,267 shares vested on December 19, |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal 2021
2023
The following table shows all stock awards that vested and the value realized upon vesting for each NEO during fiscal 2021.2023.
| Stock Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
| Name | Number of Shares Acquired on (#)(1) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)(1) | Value Realized ($)(2) | ||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | 246,770 | 21,244,429 | 391,671 | 40,729,867 | ||||||||||||
Robert J. Halliday | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn | 97,339 | 7,727,136 | ||||||||||||||
Brice Hill | 23,765 | 2,919,055 | ||||||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja | 71,977 | 6,196,500 | 80,362 | 8,356,844 | ||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour | 81,748 | 7,037,685 | ||||||||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu | 45,592 | 3,925,015 | 58,091 | 6,040,883 | ||||||||||||
Timothy M. Deane | 12,915 | 1,257,663 | ||||||||||||||
| (1) | Of the amounts shown in this column, Applied withheld the following number of shares to cover tax withholding obligations: |
| (2) | Value realized equals the fair market value of Applied common stock on the vesting date, multiplied by the number of shares that |
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 57 |
Executive Compensation
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Applied’s 2016 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”) is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that allows eligible employees, including executive officers, to voluntarily defer receipt of up to 40% of their base salaries and all or a portion of their eligible sales incentive and annual bonus payments, if any.
Deferrals made prior to the restatement of the DCP in October 2015 (the “2015 Restatement Date”) are retained as separate “rollover” accounts under the DCP. These deferrals continue to be credited with deemed interest in the sum of
(a) the yield-to-maturity of five-year U.S. Treasury notes, plus (b) 1.50%. Deferred amounts in the rollover accounts, plus deemed interest thereon, are generally payable on the same date selected by the participants or specified prior to theOctober 2015 Restatement Date under the terms of the DCP. Beginning in fiscal 2016, deferrals under the DCP are credited with deemed investment returns, gains or losses based upon investment crediting options available under the DCP. Applied does not make any matching or other employer contributions to the planDCP for our executive officers.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Under the DCP, a change in control (as defined prior to the 2015 Restatement Date)October 2015), would trigger the distribution of all deferred balances in the rollover accounts. For account balances after theOctober 2015, Restatement Date, the DCP provides distribution rules for in-service and future date distribution options and upon a qualifying separation from service, disability and change in control, including the option to change the time and form of payment within three (3) months
following a change in control, as such term is defined in the DCP. Distributions are payable from the general assets of Applied or from the assets of a grantor trust (known as a rabbi trust) established by Applied for distributions made from accounts establishedconsisting of deferrals made after theOctober 2015 Restatement Date and existing as of December 31, 2019, and their associated earnings.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 20212023
| Name | Executive ($)(1) | Registrant ($) | Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)(2) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End ($)(3) | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)(1) | Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) | Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)(2) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End ($)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary E. Dickerson | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Halliday | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Durn | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brice Hill | 224,001 | — | 7,202 | — | 383,326 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prabu G. Raja | 1,081,518 | — | 179,232 | — | 6,965,464 | 1,012,614 | — | 261,694 | — | 8,638,916 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ali Salehpour | 1,004,572 | — | 107,214 | — | 7,892,709 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omkaram Nalamasu | 804,040 | — | 159,302 | 164,438 | 5,603,559 | 798,074 | — | 225,686 | 226,241 | 6,354,866 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timothy M. Deane | 394,090 | — | 6,888 | — | 1,679,246 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Amounts in this column are included in the Salary and/or Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation columns of the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal |
| (2) | Amounts in this column are not included in the Summary Compensation Table because there were no above-market or preferential earnings for fiscal |
| (3) | Amounts in this column represent |
Applied does not have employment agreements with any of its NEOs, other than an agreement with Mr. Dickerson. The agreement with Mr. Dickerson was entered into in connection with his appointment as President and CEO.
Mr. Dickerson’s employment agreement, dated August 14, 2013, provides that if Applied terminates his employment other than for cause and other than due to death or disability, he would be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to 275% of his base salary, provided that he executes an agreement containing a release of claims and non-solicitation and non-disparagement provisions in favor of Applied.
For purposes of Mr. Dickerson’s agreement, “cause” generally means the willful failure to perform his duties after written notice and an opportunity to cure; the willful commission of a wrongful act that caused, or was reasonably likely
| 58 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Executive Compensation
to cause, substantial damage to Applied, or an act of fraud in the performance of his duties; conviction for the commission of a felony in connection with the performance of his duties; or the order of a federal or state regulatory authority requiring the termination of his employment.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
Applied does not currently have change of control agreements or arrangements with any of its NEOs.
Potential Payments Upon Termination. Under Mr. Dickerson’s employment agreement described above, he would have been entitled to receive $2,832,500 (275% of his annual base salary at the end of fiscal 2021)2023) had Applied terminated his employment without cause on October 29, 2021,27, 2023, the last business day of fiscal 2021.2023. No other NEO was party to an employment agreement in effect on October 29, 202127, 2023 or
entitled to receive severance payments under such an agreement.
Additionally, the Value Creation Awards granted to Mr. Dickerson and Dr. Raja in early fiscal 2021 provide for accelerated vesting in the event of an involuntary termination of employment without cause (as defined under the Stock Plan). In the event of such a termination, the performance period for the Value Creation Awards would be deemed to end on the date of such termination and the number of shares that would
vest would be determined as of such date. The following table shows the amounts attributable to the accelerated vesting of the Value Creation Awards if Applied had terminated Mr. Dickerson’s or Dr. Raja’s employment, respectively, without cause on October 29, 2021,27, 2023, the last business day of fiscal 2021. See “Value Creation Awards” beginning on page 39 for more information regarding the awards.2023.
Named Executive Officer | Value of Vesting Acceleration of Value Creation Awards ($)(1) | |||
Gary E. Dickerson | ||||
Prabu G. Raja | ||||
| (1) | Amount based on the number of Value Creation Awards for which vesting would have been accelerated, calculated as (i) the target number of units awarded, (ii) multiplied by the |
Qualified Retirement—Retirement – Employee Stock Incentive Plan.PSU and RSU awards granted beginning in fiscal 2019 to certain of our NEOs are subject to retirement provisions which provide for partial accelerated vesting of RSU awards and a partial payout of the PSU awards based on actual performance at the conclusion of the three-year performance period, in the event of a qualifying retirement. In order to qualify, an executive is required to have reached age 60 and have completed at least five years of service with Applied, at the time of his or her retirement. As of the end of fiscal 2021,2023, each of Mr. Dickerson, Dr. NalamasuRaja and Mr. SalehpourDr. Nalamasu would have met the conditions for a qualifying retirement under these provisions. The following table shows the amounts attributable to a partial accelerated vesting of RSU awards and partial payout of PSU awards if the NEOs had incurred a qualifying retirement on October 29, 2021,27, 2023, the last business day of fiscal 2021.2023. The retirement provision does not apply to the Value Creation Awards.
Named Executive Officer | Value of Partial RSU
($)(1) | |||
Gary E. Dickerson | ||||
| — | |||
| 10,989,810 | |||
Omkaram Nalamasu | 7,011,945 | |||
Timothy M. Deane | — | |||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| (1) | Amount based on the number of RSUs for which vesting would have been accelerated and target number of PSUs which would have |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 59 |
Executive Compensation
Change of Control—Control – Employee Stock Incentive Plan.Our Stock Plan provides that the vesting of equity awards granted under the plan to employees, including the NEOs, will be accelerated in full upon a change of control of Applied if the successor corporation (or its parent or subsidiary) does not assume or provide a substitute for the outstanding awards. Separately, equity awards will be accelerated in full if the award holder is terminated without cause or resigns employment with Applied for good reason, in each case, within 12 months following a change of control of Applied and as defined under the Stock Plan or the applicable award agreement. This double-trigger accelerated vesting does not apply if the applicable award agreement specifically states that it will not apply or if the participant’s employment is terminated due to his or her death or disability, resignation without good reason or termination for cause.
The following table shows the amounts attributable to the accelerated vesting of equity awards under the Stock Plan following a change of control in which the awards are not assumed or substituted, or within 12 months following a change of control in which the NEO is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, in each case assuming the change of control and termination or resignation occurred on October 29, 2021,27, 2023, the last business day of fiscal 2021.2023.
Named Executive Officer | Value of Vesting Acceleration ($)(1) | |||
Gary E. Dickerson | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| (1) | Amount based on the number of RSUs and target number of PSUs for which vesting would have been accelerated, multiplied by |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SEC Required Pay Ratio. In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO, to the median of the annual total compensation of our employees (other than the CEO). The fiscal 20212023 annual total compensation of our CEO, Mr. Dickerson, was $35,265,559,$26,854,544, the fiscal 20212023 annual total compensation of our median compensated employee (other than the CEO) was $109,304,$96,883, and the ratio of these amounts was 323277 to 1.
This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our human resources system of record and the methodology described below. Because the SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
Supplemental Pay Ratio without Value Creation Award. In addition toAs permitted under the requiredSEC rules, we are using the same median employee as was identified for purposes of our fiscal 2021 CEO pay ratio, as we are providing a supplementalbelieve the changes in our employee population and compensation arrangements have not significantly impacted our pay ratio that excludes from our CEO’s compensation the $15,014,064 grant date fair value of the Value Creation Award granted to him in early fiscal 2021. Because the Value Creation Awards are not expected to be
made in subsequent years and are not representative of ongoing compensation, we believe it is useful to also provide the pay ratio without the Value Creation Award. The terms of and rationale for granting the Value Creation Award to our CEO are discussed under “Value Creation Awards” beginning on page 39.
For fiscal 2021, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO without the Value Creation Award to the annual total compensation of our median compensated employee was 185 to 1.
disclosure. For purposes of identifying our median compensated employee for fiscal 2021, we used our global employee population as of October 31, 2021, the last day of fiscal 2021, identified based on our human resources system of record. We used total direct compensation as our consistently applied compensation measure for such population. In this context, total direct compensation means the sum of the applicable annualized base salary determined as of October 31, 2021, the annual incentive earned for service in fiscal 2021, and the approved value of the annual equity awards granted during fiscal 2021, not including off-cycle grants in the case of new hires, promotions, or similar circumstances. Given the Company’s global population, we used the foreign currency exchange rates in effect at the end of fiscal 2021 for the salary and the annual incentive. After identifying our median compensated employee, weWe then calculated the annual fiscal 2023 total compensation for our previously-identified median compensated employee using the same methodology used for our CEO as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table of this proxy statement.Proxy Statement.
| 60 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year (a) | Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO (1) (b) | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO (1)(2)(3) (c) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs (1) (d) | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs (1)(2)(4) (e) | Total Shareholder Return (5) (f) | Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (5) (g) | GAAP Net Income (millions) (h) | Non-GAAP Adjusted EPS (6) (i) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $26,854,544 | $ 71,918,135 | $6,475,471 | $12,376,821 | $221.11 | $142.27 | $6,856 | $8.05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | $20,399,972 | ($ 22,058,266 | ) | $5,953,570 | $ 1,634,909 | $149.67 | $105.92 | $6,525 | $7.70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | $35,265,559 | $144,856,918 | $6,675,150 | $14,982,610 | $226.06 | $148.13 | $5,888 | $6.84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Mr. Dickerson was our PEO for each year presented. The Non-PEO NEOs were: (i) for fiscal 2023, Drs. Raja and Nalamasu and Messrs. Hill and Deane, (ii) for fiscal 2022, Drs. Raja and Nalamasu, Messrs. Hill and Deane, Robert J. Halliday, and Ali Salehpour, and (iii) for fiscal 2021, Drs. Raja and Nalamasu, Messrs. Halliday and Salehpour, and Daniel J. Durn. |
| (2) | The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of “compensation actually paid,” as calculated in accordance with SEC rules. The dollar amounts do not reflect the amounts of compensation actually earned, realized or received by our NEOs during the applicable fiscal year. In accordance with SEC rules, certain adjustments were made to the Summary Compensation Table total compensation to determine the amount of “compensation actually paid,” as shown in notes 3 and 4 to this table. |
| (3) | The following table shows the amounts deducted from and added to the Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) total compensation to calculate “compensation actually paid” to Mr. Dickerson. |
Fiscal Year | SCT Total ($) | Subtract: Amounts Reported as Stock Awards in SCT ($) | Add: Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in the Year and Unvested at Year End ($) | Add: Fair Value As of the Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year ($) | Add: Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years and Unvested at Year End ($) | Add: Change As of the Vesting Date (From End of Prior Fiscal Year) in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year ($) | Subtract: Fair Value as of Prior Year-End of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year ($) | Add: Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value ($) | Compensation Actually Paid ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 26,854,544 | 23,951,048 | 34,382,124 | — | 29,015,408 | 5,617,107 | — | — | 71,918,135 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 20,399,972 | 17,783,334 | 11,152,105 | — | (40,108,077 | ) | 4,281,068 | — | — | (22,058,266 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 35,265,559 | 31,710,469 | 67,242,440 | — | 67,802,579 | 6,256,810 | — | — | 144,856,918 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 61 |
| (4) | The following table shows the amounts deducted from and added to the average SCT total compensation to calculate the average “compensation actually paid” to our Non-PEO NEOs. |
Fiscal Year | SCT Total ($) | Subtract: Amounts Reported as Stock Awards in SCT ($) | Add: Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in the Year and Unvested at Year End ($) | Add: Fair Value As of the Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year ($) | Add: Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years and Unvested at Year End ($) | Add: Change As of the Vesting Date (From End of Prior Fiscal Year) in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year ($) | Subtract: Fair Value as of Prior Year-End of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year ($) | Add: Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value ($) | Compensation Actually Paid ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 6,475,471 | 4,825,590 | 6,605,428 | — | 3,400,246 | 721,266 | — | — | 12,376,821 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 5,953,570 | 4,139,424 | 2,811,599 | — | (3,525,315 | ) | 534,479 | — | — | 1,634,909 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 6,675,150 | 5,370,836 | 6,775,456 | — | 7,971,327 | 1,370,968 | 2,439,455 | — | 14,982,610 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (5) | Total Shareholder Return for the Company and the Peer Group is based on an initial fixed investment of $100 beginning with the market close on October 23, 2020, the last trading day before fiscal 2021, and is calculated in accordance with SEC rules. The Peer Group TSR set forth in this table reflects the TSR for the PHLX Semiconductor Index, which we also use in the performance graph required by Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act, and included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended October 29, 2023. |
| (6) | Non-GAAP Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share is the financial measure that was determined to be the most important financial performance measure linking “compensation actually paid” to our NEOs to company performance for fiscal 2023 and therefore was selected as the fiscal 2023 “Company-Selected Measure” as defined in Item 402(v) of RegulationS-K under the Exchange Act. See Appendix A for a reconciliation ofnon-GAAP adjusted EPS. |
62 |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 63 |
» | Non-GAAP Adjusted EPS |
» | Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Margin |
» | Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Margin |
» | Relative TSR |
64 |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Applied’s Audit Committee is responsible for the review, approval, or ratification of “related person transactions” involving Applied or its subsidiaries and related persons. Under SEC rules, a related person is a director, executive officer, nominee for director, or 5% shareholder of a company since the beginning of the previous fiscal year, and their immediate family members. Applied has adopted written policies and procedures that apply to any transaction or series of transactions in which (1) Applied or a subsidiary is a participant, (2) the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and (3) a related person has a direct or indirect material interest.
In accordance with these policies and procedures, the Audit Committee determines whether the related person has a material interest in a transaction and may, in its discretion, approve, ratify, or take other action with respect to the transaction. The Audit Committee reviews all material facts related to the transaction and takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to
an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances, the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction, and the purpose and the potential benefits to Applied of the transaction.
In addition, the Audit Committee has delegated authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee to review and approve transactions in accordance with specified criteria, if advance review by the Audit Committee is not feasible. Any transactions approved by the Chair must be reported to the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduledregularly-scheduled meeting.
The Audit Committee has adopted standing pre-approvals for limited transactions with related persons. Pre-approved transactions are as follows:
| » | Any transaction with another company with which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee, director, or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company’s shares, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of that company’s total annual revenues; |
| » |
Any charitable contribution, grant, or endowment by Applied or The Applied Foundation to a charitable organization, foundation, or university with which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer) or a director, if the amount involved does not exceed the lesser of $1 million or 2% of the charitable organization’s total annual receipts; |
| » | Compensation to executive officers or directors that has been approved by the |
| » | Transactions in which all shareholders receive proportional benefits or where the rates or charges involved are determined by competitive bids; and |
| » | Banking-related services involving a bank depository of funds, transfer agent, registrar, trustee under a trust indenture, or similar service. |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 65 |
PROPOSAL 3—RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
PROPOSAL 3—RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM3 – Ratification of The Appointment of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
PROPOSAL 3 – Ratification of The Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We are asking shareholders to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as Applied’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2022,2024, which began on November 1, 2021October 30, 2023 and will end on October 30, 2022.27, 2024. The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the retention of KPMG to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Although ratification is not legally required, Applied is submitting the appointment of KPMG to its shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. In the event that this appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee of the Board will reconsider the appointment. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the fiscal year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.
The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, oversight, evaluation and, when appropriate, replacement of the independent registered public accounting firm that serves as the Company’s independent accountants. KPMG has served as
our independent registered public accounting firm since 2004. In selecting the independent auditor, the Audit Committee annually considers many factors, including its qualifications and performance during fiscal 20212023 and 2020,2022; its independence and tenure as the Company’s auditor; KPMG’s capability and expertise in handling the breadth and complexity of the Company’s global operations, including the expertise and capability of the lead audit partner; historical and recent performance, including the extent and quality of KPMG’s communications with the Audit Committee; Public Company Accounting Oversight Board inspection reports,reports; and the appropriateness of KPMG’s fees for audit and non-audit services. Further, in conjunction with ensuring the rotation of KPMG’s lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee and its Chair are directly involved within the selection of KPMG’s lead engagement partner. The next mandatorymost recent rotation forof KPMG’s lead engagement partner is scheduled to occur inoccurred following the completion of the fiscal year 2024.2023 audit.
Representatives of KPMG will be present at the Annual Meeting. They will be given an opportunity to make a statement if they wish and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The following table shows fees paid by Applied for professional services rendered by KPMG for fiscal 20212023 and 2020,2022, which ended on October 31, 202129, 2023 and October 25, 2020,30, 2022, respectively. All of the fees shown in the table were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with its pre-approval process.
| Fee Category | Fiscal 2021 | Fiscal 2020 | Fiscal 2023 | Fiscal 2022 | ||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Audit Fees | $ | 6,500 | $ | 6,839 | $7,412 | $6,798 | ||||||||||
Audit-Related Fees | 67 | 111 | 64 | 23 | ||||||||||||
Tax Fees: |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Tax Compliance and Review | 396 | 601 | 257 | 234 | ||||||||||||
Tax Planning and Advice | 94 | 275 | 180 | 28 | ||||||||||||
All Other Fees | 11 | 75 | 8 | 12 | ||||||||||||
Total Fees | $ | 7,068 | $ | 7,901 | $7,921 | $7,095 | ||||||||||
| 66 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
PROPOSAL 3 – Ratification of The Appointment of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Audit Fees consisted of fees for (a) professional services rendered for the annual audit of Applied’s consolidated financial statements and audit of internal control over financial reporting, (b) review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and (c) services that are typically provided by an independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-Related Fees included fees for assurance and related services that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of Applied’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.Fees,” Audit-related fees also includedincluding fees incurred for services in connection with compliance with government-funded grant requirements and audits of financial statements of certain employee benefit plans.
Tax Fees consisted of fees for professional services for tax compliance and review, and tax planning and advice. Tax compliance and review services consisted ofincluded federal, state, and international tax compliance, assistance with tax audits and appeals, and assistance with customs and duties audits. Tax planning and advice services consisted ofincluded consultations related to tax compliance matters and certain international operations.
All Other Fees consisted of fees for professional services other than the services reported above, including services in connection with a contract compliance audit and consultations regarding an employee benefit plan.with local regulations.
The Audit Committee has concluded that the provision of the non-audit services described above was compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG.
|
| | The Board recommends that you vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG as Applied’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2024 | |
Policy on Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee reviews and, as appropriate, pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, and tax services, as well as specifically designated non-audit services which, in the opinion of the Audit Committee, will not impair the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm. Pre-approval generally is provided for up to one year, and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services
and generally is subject to a specific budget. The independent registered public accounting firm and Applied’s management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, including the fees for the services performed to date. In addition, the Audit Committee also may pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis, as necessary or appropriate.
The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Applied specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
Composition. The Audit Committee of the Board is composed of the directors named below. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence and financial experience requirements under applicable SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards. In addition, the Board has determined that each of Judy Bruner, Adrianna C. Ma,Kevin P. March, Yvonne McGill and Scott A. McGregor is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules.
Responsibilities. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter that has been adopted by the Board. The charter is reviewed annually for changes, as appropriate. The Audit Committee is responsible for general oversight of Applied’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes, system of internal control over financial reporting, and tax, trade, legal, regulatory and ethical compliance. Applied’s management is responsible for: (a) maintaining Applied’s books of account and preparing periodic financial statements based thereon; and (b) maintaining the system of internal
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 67 |
PROPOSAL 3 – Ratification of The Appointment of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
control over financial reporting. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing Applied’s annual consolidated financial statements.statements and Applied’s internal control over financial reporting.
Review with Management and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.Firm. The Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:
| 1. | The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), together and separately, Applied’s audited consolidated financial statements contained in Applied’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year |
| 2. | The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG matters required to be discussed by applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. |
| 3. | The Audit Committee has received from KPMG the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding KPMG’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with KPMG its independence. |
Based on the review and discussions referred to in paragraphs 1-3 above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in Applied’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 20212023 for filing with the SEC.
The Audit Committee appointed KPMG as Applied’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 20222024 and recommends to shareholders that they ratify the appointment of KPMG as Applied’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022.2024.
This report is submitted by the Audit Committee.
Judy Bruner (Chair)
Adrianna C. MaKevin P. March
Yvonne McGill
Scott A. McGregor
PROPOSAL 4—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING
PROPOSAL 4—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING4 – Shareholder Proposal
Regarding Lobbying Report
PROPOSAL 4 – Shareholder Proposal Regarding Lobbying Report
Kenneth Steiner, whose address and stockholding will be provided by us upon request, has submitted the following proposal. The shareholder proposal will be voted on at the 20222024 Annual Meeting only if properly presented by or on behalf of the proponent.
Applied is not responsible for the accuracy or content of the proposal and supporting statement, which are presented below as received from the proponent.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.
| The Board recommends that you vote AGAINST this shareholder proposal | |
Shareholder Proposal
Proposal 4 –
Whereas, full disclosure of Applied Materials’ lobbying activities and expenditures to assess whether our Resolved, the shareholders of Applied Materials request the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing: 1. Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications. 2. Payments by Applied Materials used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient. 3. Applied Materials’ membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation. 4. Description of management’s decision-making process and the Board’s oversight for making payments described in sections 2 and 3 above. For purposes of this proposal, a “grassroots lobbying communication” is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the
The report shall be presented to the Audit Committee and posted on Applied Supporting Statement
Applied Materials
|
spending “at least double what’s publicly reported.”2 Applied |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 69 |
PROPOSAL 4 – Shareholder Proposal
Regarding Lobbying Report
Materials lists memberships in the Chamber of Commerce and National Association of Manufacturers, which together have spent over $2.0 billion on federal lobbying since 1998. Applied Materials And Applied Materials does not disclose its contributions to groups which write and endorse model legislation, such as sponsoring the American Legislative Exchange Council.3 Applied Materials’ lack of disclosure presents reputational risk when its lobbying contradicts company public positions. For example, Applied Materials publicly supports addressing climate change, yet the Chamber opposed the Paris climate accord. And while our company does not disclose if it belongs to the American Legislative Exchange Council, which is attacking “woke capitalism,”4 Applied Materials is represented by its trade association, as the Chamber sits on its Private Enterprise Advisory Council. I urge Applied Materials to expand its lobbying disclosure. 1. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-15/chip-leaders-head-to-washington-to-lobby-for-china-rules-reIief#xj4y7vzkg. 2. https://the intercept.com/2019/08/06/business-group-spending-on-lobbying-in-washington-is-at-least-double-whats-pubIicly-reported/. 3. https://documented.net/reporting/southwest-airIines-chevron-1-800-contacts-and-other-corporations-amongst-sponsors-of-alec-annual-meeting. 4. https://www.exposedbycmd.org/2022/07/27/abandoning-free-market-and-liberty-principles-alec-takes-on-woke-capitalism-bodily-autonomy-and-more-at-its-annual-meeting/. |
Board of Directors Statement in Opposition
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 4 for the following reasons: » We already disclose the information requested by the proposal. Our Political Contributions and Activity Report, which is published on our website, and other public reports provide information about our lobbying priorities; our lobbying activities and expenditures; memberships in and payments to trade, business, and civic associations; and the governance structure for oversight of our lobbying and political activities; » We have policies and procedures in place, at the Board and management level, to promote effective oversight of our lobbying and political activities; and » Our current lobbying and political activities are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. We already disclose the following reasons:
The Board isWe are committed to strong corporate governance practicestransparently disclosing information regarding our lobbying and responsiveness to Applied’s shareholders through regular dialogue. The Board also believes in maintaining policies and practices that servepolitical activities. In recognition of the best interestsimportance of all shareholders. In addition to the existing ability of shareholders holding at least 20% of our outstanding shares of common stock to call a special meeting, Applied’s shareholders have meaningful shareholder rights: the ability to act by written consent, propose actions for consideration at annual meetings, and nominate directors through proxy access. Following careful review and consideration, the Board has determined that support for this shareholder proposal is unwarranted and not in the best interests of Applied or its shareholders. The Board continues to believe that 20% ownership is the appropriate threshold for the right to call a special meeting.
Applied shareholders already have a meaningful right to call a special meeting
The Board acknowledges that a shareholder right to call a special meeting at an appropriate threshold serves as an effective balance between ensuring the Board’s accountabilitytopic to shareholders and enabling the Board and management to operate in an effective manner. Our Bylaws currently permit the shareholders of 20% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company to call special meetings. The Board believes thatother stakeholders, we have for many years provided extensive disclosures regarding our current 20% ownership threshold strikes a reasonable and appropriate balance between providing shareholders with the ability to call a special meeting while protecting the Company against the risk that a relatively small number of shareholders,lobbying activities, including those with special interests, could call special meetings to pursue matters that may not reflect the interests of the Company and a broader group of shareholders, with the resulting expense and disruption to our business.
When the Company implemented the right for shareholders to call a special meeting in 2015, the Board considered (1) the feedback from our extensive shareholder outreach, (2) our concentrated shareholder base and (3) benchmarking data of S&P 500 companiesfederal lobbying expenditures and our comparable peer companies incorporatedtrade association memberships, as well as our political spending, in Delaware. We continue to give significant weight to these factorsour annual Sustainability Report and after considering them again believe thaton the existing 20% threshold continues to be appropriate in light of these factors.
As of December 2021, twocorporate responsibility page of our largest shareholders together holdwebsite in the “Public Policy Reports” section at: https://www.appliedmaterials.com/us/en/corporate-responsibility/reports-and-policies.html. On a quarterly basis, we also submit publicly-available reports on federal lobbying activities and expenses, semi-annual reports on federal contributions, and state-level reports, as required by relevant laws.
More recently, we have also published a Political Contributions and Activity Report (the “Report”) in the “Public Policy Reports” section, which makes information more than 10% of our outstanding shares, and three of our largest shareholders together hold approximately 20% of our outstanding shares. Given this composition, reducing the ownership threshold to 10% could enable just a
small minority of shareholders to trigger the expense and disruption of a special meeting. It would also allow such shareholders to pursue narrow self-interestsconveniently accessible. The Report provides disclosures that are not widely viewed among our shareholder base as requiring immediate attention or that are not aligned withresponsive to the long-term interests of the Company or our shareholders more broadly.
The Company’s current 20% ownership threshold continues to be lower than that of many other companies. As of December 2021, of the U.S. companies in the S&P 500 that permit their shareholders to call special meetings, a majority set the ownership threshold at or above 25%. Moreover, as of 2021, the current 20% ownership threshold is the same as, or more favorable to shareholders than, the special meeting rights at approximately 68% of the 486 S&P 500 companies surveyed by FactSet and that have also implemented a special meeting right. In addition, of our comparable peer companies incorporated in Delaware, over 75% either have not implemented the right to call a special meeting at all, or have done so at or above a 20% ownership threshold.
In 2020, Applied proposed for shareholders’ consideration, and shareholders approved, the right for shareholders to act by written consent at a 20% ownership threshold. In advance of this management proposal, Applied engaged in extensive shareholder outreach to hear directly from our shareholders about their views on shareholder action by written consent,proposal’s request, including the appropriate ownership threshold. We engaged with holders representing approximately 46% of our outstanding shares and discussed reducing the threshold for calling a special meeting in lieu of implementing action by written consent. The universal view among all of our shareholders who supported adopting action by written consent was that setting the threshold at 20% for both the rights of shareholders to call a special meeting and to act by written consent was appropriate. This is consistent with shareholder feedback received in 2015 when we initially added the right to call a special meeting. Of the holders of over 32% of our outstanding shares with whom we engaged, over 95% supported the implementation of the special meeting right at a 20% ownership threshold, instead of at 10%.following:
Special meetings require substantial resources
| » | Policies and procedures governing our participation in the political process; |
For a company as large and complex as Applied, a special meeting of shareholders, regardless of whether the meeting is held in person or virtually, is a significant undertaking and in our view should occur only when fiduciary obligations or strategic concerns require that matters be addressed expeditiously. Preparing and conducting a special meeting creates significant distraction for the Board and the management team from their focus on maximizing long-term financial returns, achieving the Company’s long-term strategic objectives and operating Applied’s business. Given the size
| » | The focus areas and priorities for our lobbying and other political activities; |
| » | Lobbying activities, which have not included any “grassroots lobbying” efforts to date; |
| » | Lobbying expenditures and political contributions; |
PROPOSAL 4—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING
of the Company’s shareholder base, a special shareholder meeting would require a substantial commitment of time, effort and resources by the Company, the Board and senior management to prepare for and conduct the meeting.PROPOSAL 4 – Shareholder Proposal
Special meetings should be limited to circumstances where a meaningful representation of our shareholders believes that a matter is sufficiently urgent or extraordinary that it must be addressed between annual meetings. Giving holders of as little as 10% of our outstanding shares the unlimited power to call a special meeting would permit a small minority of shareholders to use the extraordinary measure of calling a special meeting to serve their narrow self-interest at the expense of the majority of our shareholders and Applied, and opens the door to potential abuse and waste of corporate resources.
Therefore, the Board continues to believe that maintaining the 20% ownership threshold preserves a reasonable and appropriate balance between providing shareholders with a right to call a special meeting while protecting against distraction and unnecessary waste of corporate resources, and the disruption associated with convening a special meeting.
Current strong corporate governance practices demonstrate accountability and responsiveness
The Board further believes that Applied’s strong corporate governance practices make adoption of this proposal unnecessary. Many of our current shareholder rights, including our special meeting right, were informed by shareholder input received through our robust year-round engagement program. Applied’s corporate governance practices provide transparency and accountability of the Board to all Applied shareholders, and ensure that Applied is responsive to shareholder concerns, without the additional expense and risk associated with a lower special meeting threshold:Regarding Lobbying Report
| » |
|
| » | Board and management oversight of our |
| » | Links to our federal and |
In lightThe Report also discloses the activities and expenditures of Applied’s strong corporate governance practices, including the existing rightsApplied Materials, Inc. Political Action Committee (“AMPAC”), which is funded entirely through voluntary contributions from eligible employees.
We believe that the Report, which we intend to publish annually, and our overall reporting on this topic are consistent with or exceed that of shareholdersmany other public companies; fully comply with the level of disclosure required by federal, state, and local laws; and provide appropriate transparency into and context with respect to call a special meeting, act by written consentour lobbying activities and nominate directors through proxy access,expenditures and the policies and procedures governing such activities.
We have policies and procedures in place to promote effective oversight of our lobbying and political activities
As described in the Report, we have appropriate Board- and management-level procedures in place to oversee our lobbying and political activities. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board, comprised entirely of independent directors, oversees our public policy activities and receives an annual report detailing our political contributions and policies relating to our political giving and activities. The Vice President of Communications and Public Affairs and the Managing Director, Government Affairs, are responsible for the management of our lobbying and political activities, including: ensuring our lobbying and political spending aligns with our primary policy focus areas, such as technology regulation, international trade, talent and workforce development, and sustainability; and reviewing and approving the Company’s membership in trade, business, and civic associations.
AMPAC’s activities are overseen and its contributions are reviewed and approved by the AMPAC board of directors. AMPAC contributes to federal candidates, political action committees, and party committees supporting issues of strategic importance to our Company, consistent with legal requirements. In addition, a State Contributions Committee, comprised of the individuals who also serve on the AMPAC board of directors, oversees corporate political spending at the state and local levels. These responsibilities are further described in the Report.
Our lobbying and political activities are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders
The Board ultimately believes that the Company should be an effective participant in the political process, including through lobbying activities and participation in trade and industry associations. As a leader in the technology industry, our participation in lobbying activities is a result of careful consideration of political and legislative matters that may have an impact on the Company or our strategy and allows us to advocate for our policy positions, share our business expertise, and be part of public education efforts regarding issues facing our industry and the business community. As we disclose in the Report, the focus areas of our lobbying include technology regulation, international trade, research and development (R&D), human resources and labor, and sustainability. Efforts within these areas include advocating for immigration reform that embraces the contributions of immigrants to the economy; advocating for fairness, diversity and inclusion; and working on policies, partnerships and R&D incentives to develop and advance next-generation technologies. We believe this thoughtful approach and engagement further the best interests of the Company, our shareholders, and our employees. For example, as disclosed in our 2022 Sustainability Report, we advocated for passage of the U.S. CHIPS and Science Act, which provides a catalyst for the semiconductor industry to accelerate investments to build more robust supply chains, speed up innovation and create thousands of new jobs.
Additionally, we are members of various groups for reasons unrelated to lobbying, such as information gathering and professional development. These efforts are necessarily focused on issues and positions important to the Company; however, lobbying done on behalf of our industry by certain industry groups of which we may be members may not necessarily represent our positions at all times. Our membership and participation in an organization does not imply our endorsement of the entirety of that organization’s or its members’ policy positions. Where the views of a particular association of which we are a member are not aligned with our own views, we engage to share our dissenting views to advance the policy debate within the association membership.
Following careful review and consideration and for the reasons stated above, the Board has determined that adoption of thethis shareholder proposal is unnecessarynot necessary or appropriate and is not in the best interestsinterest of Applied andor its shareholders.
PROPOSAL 5—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND POLICY5 – Shareholder Proposal
Regarding Pay Equity Reporting
Jing Zhao,PROPOSAL 5 – Shareholder Proposal Regarding Pay Equity Reporting
Arjuna Capital, on behalf of Ronald Strom and Catherine Pascal, whose address and stockholding will be provided by us upon request, has submitted the following proposal. The shareholder proposal will be voted on at the 20222024 Annual Meeting only if properly presented by or on behalf of the proponent.
See “Adjusted Pay Equity Disclosure” on page 23 of this Proxy Statement for information regarding the adjusted pay ratios we have disclosed on our corporate website at: https://www.appliedmaterials.com/us/en/corporate-responsibility/people.html#payequity.
Applied is not responsible for the accuracy or content of the proposal and supporting statement, which are presented below as received from the proponent.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.
| The Board recommends that you vote AGAINST this shareholder proposal | |
Shareholder Proposal
Racial and Gender Pay Gaps Whereas: Pay inequities persist across race and gender and pose substantial risks to companies and society. Black workers’ median annual earnings represent 77 percent of white wages. The median income for women working full time is 84 percent that of men. Intersecting race, Black women earn 76 percent and Latina women 63 percent.1 At the current rate, women will not reach pay equity until 2059, Black women in 2130, and Latina women in 2224.2 Citigroup estimates closing minority and gender wage gaps 20 years ago could have generated 12 trillion dollars in additional national income. PwC estimates closing the gender pay gap could boost Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries’ economies by 2 trillion dollars annually.3 Actively managing pay equity is associated with improved representation. Diversity in leadership is linked to superior stock performance and return on equity.4 Underrepresented minorities represent 19 percent of Applied Materials’s workforce and 5 percent of executives. Women represent 19 percent of the workforce and 13 percent of executives.5 Best practice pay equity reporting consists of two parts: 1. unadjusted median pay gaps, assessing equal opportunity to high paying roles, 2. statistically adjusted gaps, assessing whether minorities and non-minorities, men and women, are paid the same for similar roles. Applied Materials does not report quantitative unadjusted or adjusted pay gaps. About 50 percent of the 100 largest U.S. employers currently report adjusted gaps, and an increasing number of companies disclose unadjusted gaps to address the structural bias women and minorities face regarding job opportunity and pay.6 Racial and gender unadjusted median pay gaps are accepted as the valid way of measuring pay inequity by the United States Census Bureau, Department of Labor, OECD, and International Labor Organization. The United Kingdom and Ireland mandate disclosure of median gender pay gaps.7 Resolved: Shareholders request Applied Materials report on both quantitative median and adjusted pay gaps across race and gender, including associated policy, reputational, competitive, and operational risks, and risks related to recruiting and retaining diverse talent. The report should be prepared at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information, litigation strategy and legal compliance information. |
| 72 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
PROPOSAL 5 – Shareholder Proposal
Regarding Pay Equity Reporting
Racial/gender pay gaps are defined as the difference between non-minority and minority/male and female median earnings expressed as a percentage of non-minority/male earnings (Wikipedia/OECD, respectively). Supporting Statement: An annual report adequate for investors to assess performance could, with board discretion, integrate base, bonus and equity compensation to calculate: • percentage median and adjusted gender pay gap, globally and/or by country, where appropriate • percentage median and adjusted racial/minority/ethnicity pay gap, US and/or by country, where appropriate 1 https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/cps-pinc/pinc-05.html - par_textimage_24 2 https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5bc65db67d0c9102cca54b74/t/622f4567fae4ea772ae60492/1647265128087/ 3 Ibid. 4 Ibid. 5 applied-materials-sustainability-2030-goals-and-progress.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf (appliedmaterials.com) 6 https://diversiq.com/which-sp-500-companies-disclose-gender-pay-equity-data/ 7 https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5bc65db67d0c9102cca54b74/t/622f4567fae4ea772ae60492/1647265128087/ |
Board of Directors Statement in Opposition
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 5 for the following reasons: » We are committed to the philosophy of providing equitable compensation for our employees that accounts for employees’ roles, organizational levels, and geographic locations. To ensure that we are consistently living up to that compensation philosophy, we conduct pay parity analyses and review our global pay practices annually, and adjust employee compensation where warranted; » We agree with and commit to fulfilling the proposal’s request to disclose adjusted pay ratios. We will publish in our 2023 Sustainability Report our adjusted pay ratios by gender (men compared to women), both globally and for the U.S., as well as the adjusted pay ratio comparing minorities with non-minorities in the U.S. In each instance, the ratio will be based on total compensation (i.e., the sum of base salary, cash bonus and stock awards), and in alignment with our compensation philosophy, will account for factors such as employees’ roles, organizational levels, and geographic locations. We are committed to continuing to disclose these ratios annually in the Sustainability Report; » Our primary concern with the proposal is the request that we also report unadjusted median pay ratios. Unadjusted ratios compare pay of employees without regard to their roles, organizational levels or geographic locations. As such, they are not reflective of whether we are providing equitable pay. Our view is that these unadjusted ratios would not provide any meaningful insight or transparency – and would not accurately represent our pay equity; and » In terms of broader representation and equal opportunity, we have set bold 2030 goals to increase gender and racial representation in our workforce and we publish our representation data annually. We have also established a strategy and processes to foster a Culture of Inclusion, and have implemented a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) Engine to accelerate our progress. |
We are committed to equitable pay, and our compensation practices reflect competitive pay for performance
We share the proponent’s focus on pay equity, and we firmly believe that our employees should receive equitable pay regardless of gender, race, ethnicity or other protected categories. We are committed to compensating our employees fairly and equitably and, to this end, we have structured our compensation program so that our employees’ pay is based on relevant factors such as their roles, organizational levels, and geographic locations and not on their demographics. To ensure this outcome, on an annual basis over the past several years, we have engaged a third-party
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 73 |
PROPOSAL 5 – Shareholder Proposal
Regarding Pay Equity Reporting
labor economist to conduct statistical analyses relevant to gender and racial pay equity in the U.S. Through this process, we make adjustments as appropriate. We are currently working to expand this approach to our other locations.
We are committing to publish annually in our Sustainability Report our pay ratios – comparing compensation for men and women both globally and for the U.S., and comparing compensation for minorities with non-minorities in the U.S.
In our engagement with shareholders, we have heard from certain shareholders that additional disclosure regarding our pay practices would be beneficial. Accordingly, and as part of our continued commitment to enhanced transparency and accountability, we will annually disclose adjusted pay ratios by gender for our employees, both globally and for our U.S. employees, and by minorities compared to non-minorities for our U.S. employees, beginning with our 2023 Sustainability Report, which is scheduled to be published in June 2024. Our adjusted pay ratios will reflect total compensation, consisting of base salary, cash bonus and stock awards. We believe that adjusted pay ratios better reflect pay equity as the ratios take into account factors such as employees’ roles, organizational levels, and geographic locations. These disclosures should advance shareholder understanding of pay equity at Applied.
We do not believe that an unadjusted median pay figure is a meaningful metric for pay equity. An unadjusted median pay ratio measures the difference in pay of two employees whose compensation happens to fall at the midpoint among employees in a given demographic (such as gender or ethnicity), without accounting for valid factors that impact pay, such as employees’ roles, organizational levels, and geographic locations. This statistic does not accurately demonstrate whether women and racial-minority employees are being paid equitably for similar roles and would not advance an understanding of pay equity at Applied.
The Board does not believe that the proposal’s request that we also report unadjusted median pay ratios across race and gender would provide transparency with respect to pay equity and equal opportunity, and would not enhance an understanding of or accountability for our diversity efforts.
We are transparent regarding the diversity of our workforce, and we hold ourselves accountable for our goals to increase representation of women and minorities
We believe there is no greater asset to innovation than the diversity of our people. Fostering diverse perspectives and experiences unlocks breakthrough innovation and strengthens every aspect of our business. To this end, we have set bold goals for us to achieve by 2030: 25% women representation globally; 21% executive women representation globally; 25% underrepresented minority representation in the U.S. workforce; and 10% executive underrepresented minority representation the U.S. workforce. Furthermore, we aspire to achieve equal global and executive representation of women by 2040.
We believe that a commitment to transparency helps to build trust with our shareholders and internal and external stakeholders, and holds us accountable to our commitments. Since 2018, we have published talent data, goals, and actions being taken to increase representation. In our annual Sustainability Report, we currently report the actual percentage representation, and its trend over time, for representation among global women, U.S. women, and U.S. underrepresented minorities across four job levels: Executives, People Managers, Professionals, and Other Professionals (hourly employees). We believe that these metrics are more meaningful indicators of representation and equal opportunity than the unadjusted median pay ratios sought by the proponent. In addition, to provide even greater transparency, we publish our consolidated EEO-1 reports.
We have implemented programs to foster an inclusive culture and to increase diverse representation
More broadly, we are committed to strengthening a Culture of Inclusion across every business group, function and region of our Company. Our Culture of Inclusion strategy is focused on: engaging leaders as champions of change; eliminating systemic barriers to inclusion; and operationalizing inclusion in all we do.
To accelerate our Culture of Inclusion strategy and support our efforts in achieving our 2030 diversity goals, we launched a DEI Engine – a framework of training, resources and process to empower all employees, at every level, to accelerate our progress. The three pillars of the DEI Engine are: ingraining an inclusive culture; inspire, attract, and retain talent; and impact DEI in our industry and society. Ensuring equitable compensation falls within the inspire, attract and retain talent pillar.
In addition, we invest in building an inclusive talent pipeline to expand opportunities for those who have been traditionally underrepresented in the technology sector, benefitting individuals while providing the Company and our
|
|
Board of Directors Statement in Opposition
PROPOSAL 5 – Shareholder Proposal
The Board Regarding Pay Equity Reporting
industry with future talent to power future growth. To seed the pipeline, we partner with nonprofit organizations, colleges, and universities to foster interest and build STEM capabilities, particularly among girls and underrepresented minorities. Our investments continue into early-career development, with robust programs supporting interns, new college graduates, and women in engineering and technology.
We encourage you to read more about our DEI and our Culture of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 5 for the following reasons:Inclusion initiatives in our Sustainability Report, which is updated on an annual basis.
The Company has a deep commitment to operating its business in a sustainable and responsible manner, and the Board has taken steps to ensure that the executive compensation program reflects this commitment. Following careful review and consideration and for the reasons stated above, the Board has determined that support for all of the disclosures sought by this shareholder proposal is unwarranted because the Board’s Human Resourcesnot necessary and Compensation Committee (the “HRCC”) already considers feedback on employee experience and reviews the CEO pay ratios of the Company and its peers. Moreover, the HRCC regularly reviews and updates the executive compensation program to align the program with the Company’s business objectives, shareholder feedback and market trends.
The principal objectives of the Company’s executive compensation program are:
As a reference point for evaluating our compensation program, the HRCC regularly reviews compensation practices within our peer group. See “Compensation and Analysis—Compensation Governance and Decision-Making Framework—Fiscal 2021 Peer Group Companies.” On an annual basis, the HRCC also reviews the Company’s CEO
PROPOSAL 5—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND POLICY
pay ratio, changesis not in the ratio from year to year, as well as the ratiosbest interests of certain other peer companies and companies in the S&P 500 Index. Although SEC rules require disclosure of the ratio of annual CEO compensation to the annual compensation of a median employee, the HRCC does not believe that the pay ratio should more directly guide our compensation principlesApplied or that our executive compensation program should be changed as described in this proposal.
Our Board and management team actively seek the feedback of our shareholders, including with respect to our executive compensation program and matters related to our employees, and consider that feedback in their decision-making. Feedback obtained through our robust shareholder outreach program over the last few years has resulted in the implementation of changes to our executive compensation program, including a comprehensive redesign of our long-term incentive program in 2017 that, among other things, established new performance metrics and extended performance measurement periods from one year to three years.
As described in more detail under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” a significant portion of the Company’s executive compensation is performance-based and dependent upon the success of the Company in creating long-term value for its shareholders. Annual bonuses are determined by the HRCC based on achievement of a set of objective corporate scorecard measures across four categories—Financial and Market Performance and Execution, Products and Growth, Customers, and People and Organization—as well as individual executive performance. The corporate scorecard objectives include those specifically tied to issues relevant to the Company’s workforce, such as employee safety, learning and career development, and diversity and inclusion. As a result, employee considerations are reflected in the executive compensation program.
Our Board and management team are committed to continually receiving input from employees and responding to
such input. The Company has historically managed and measured organizational health with a view to gaining insight into employees’ experiences, levels of workplace satisfaction, and feelings of engagement and inclusion. The Company has used McKinsey & Company’s Organizational Health Index (OHI) and employee engagement pulse surveys to measure its organizational health and employee experiences. Insights from the Company’s surveys are used to develop both company-wide and business unit level organizational and talent development plans. In addition, on a quarterly basis, the Company holds an all employee meeting where our Chief Executive Officer, who is also a Board member, and other members of management provide an update on the Company’s business performance for the quarter and hold a Q&A session where they answer questions from employees.
Our Board also periodically meets with employees worldwide. For example, prior to the restrictions on travel brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic, in 2019, the Board held Board and Committee meetings at our offices in Taiwan, where directors attended the grand opening of our new Display Equipment Manufacturing Center and R&D Laboratory, participated in a local employee all-hands meeting and met with our regional executives. These interactions, along with meetings with other senior leadership throughout the year, give directors additional visibility to provide oversight of the Company’s culture, strategies, and operations.
The Company believes that input from employees is valuable in decision making and in shaping organizational culture. However, the Board believes the independent HRCC is best positioned to have a holistic view of the Company’s strategic needs and objectives, and therefore to design incentives to promote them.
For these reasons, the Board has determined that support for this shareholder proposal is unwarranted and believes that our current compensation program and policy are appropriate, reflect stakeholder input and incorporate considerations around our valued people.
| ||
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY Questions and Answers About the Proxy
STATEMENT AND OUR 2022 ANNUAL MEETING Statement and Our 2024 Annual Meeting
Questions and Answers About the Proxy Statement and Our 2024 Annual Meeting
| Q: | Why am I receiving these materials? |
| A: | The Board of Directors of Applied Materials is providing these materials to you in connection with Applied’s solicitation of proxies for use at Applied’s |
These proxy materials are being provided on or about January 24, 2024 to all shareholders of record of Applied as of January 10, 2024.
| Q: |
|
What information is contained in these materials? |
| A: | This Proxy Statement contains important information regarding the |
If you requested to receive printed proxy materials, these materials also include an accompanying proxy card. If you received more than one proxy card, this generally means your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. Please provide voting instructions for each proxy card or, if you vote via the Internet or by telephone, vote once for each proxy card you receive to ensure that all of your shares are voted. |
| Q: | What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting? What are the Board’s recommendations? |
| A: | The following table describes the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting and the Board’s voting recommendations: |
Proposal | Board Recommendation | |||||
1. Election of ten directors |
| FOR each Nominee | ||||
2. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year |
| FOR | ||||
3. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year |
| FOR | ||||
4. Shareholder proposal regarding |
| AGAINST | ||||
5. Shareholder proposal regarding |
| AGAINST | ||||
At the time this Proxy Statement was mailed, we were not aware of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than those set forth in this Proxy Statement and in the notice accompanying this Proxy Statement.
| 76 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Questions and Answers About the Proxy
Statement and Our 2024 Annual Meeting
| Q: | What is the record date? How many shares are entitled to vote? |
| A: | Shareholders who owned Applied common stock at the close of business on January |
A complete list of these shareholders will be available for the 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting. To make arrangements to view the list, please contact our Corporate Secretary by e-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com. A shareholder may examine the list for any legally valid purpose related to the Annual Meeting.
|
| Q: | What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder of record and as a beneficial owner? |
| A: | Most Applied shareholders hold their shares as beneficial owners (through a broker, bank, or other nominee) rather than as a shareholder of record (directly in their own name). |
|
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR 2022 ANNUAL MEETING
Beneficial Owners.If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a broker, bank, or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank, or other nominee, which is considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, or other nominee on how to vote the shares in your account. However, because you are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares electronicallyin person at the Annual Meeting, unless you followrequest and provide at the instructionsAnnual Meeting a valid proxy from your broker, bank, or other nominee. Your broker, bank, or other nominee has included a voting instruction form for you to use to direct them how to vote your shares. Please instruct your broker, bank, or other nominee how to vote your shares using the voting instruction form you received from them.
| Q: |
|
| A: | Applied shareholders on the record date or their legal proxy holders may attend the Annual |
The use of cameras, recording equipment and other electronic devices (including cell phones, tablets, laptops, etc.) is not permitted at the Annual Meeting.
| Q: | How can I vote my shares? |
| A: | You may vote over the Internet, by telephone, by mail, or |
Voting over the Internet. To vote over the Internet, please follow either the instructions included on your proxy card or the voting instructions you receive by e-mail or that are
being provided via the Internet. If you vote over the Internet, you do not need to complete and mail a proxy card.
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 77 |
Questions and Answers About the Proxy
Statement and Our 2024 Annual Meeting
Voting by Telephone. If you have requested printed proxy materials, such materials will include instructions for how to vote by telephone. Please follow either the instructions included on your proxy card or voting instruction form. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to complete and mail a proxy card.
Voting by Mail. If you have requested printed proxy materials, you may vote by mail by signing the proxy card and returning it in the prepaid and addressed envelope enclosed with the proxy materials. By signing and returning the proxy card, you are authorizing the individuals named on the proxy card to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in the manner you indicate. We encourage you to sign and return the proxy card even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting so that your shares will be voted if you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting. If you receive more than one proxy card, it is an indication that your shares are held in multiple accounts. Please sign and return all proxy cards to ensure that all of your shares are voted. Your printed proxy materials may also indicate methods whereby you may vote by telephone or over the Internet instead of signing, dating a returning the proxy card by mail.
Voting Electronicallyin Person at the Meeting. If you attend the virtual Annual Meeting and plan to vote electronicallyin person, we will provide you with a ballot at the Annual Meeting, you can vote by following the instructions provided when you log in to the online virtual Annual Meeting platform.Meeting. If you are a shareholder of record, you have the right to vote electronicallyin person at the Annual Meeting. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name and you may alsowish to vote electronicallyin person at the Annual Meeting, if you followwill need to bring to the instructionsAnnual Meeting a legal proxy from your broker bank, or other nominee authorizing you to vote those shares.
Applied Employee Plan Participants. If you own shares purchased through Applied’s Omnibus Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan that are still held by the plans’ recordkeeper and you do not vote these shares, the shares may be voted in accordance with standard brokerage industry practices only on routine matters.
| Q: | Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy? |
| A: | If you are a shareholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before the Annual Meeting. To change your vote or revoke your proxy, you must: |
Sign and return a later-dated proxy card, or enter a new vote over the Internet or by telephone; or |
Provide written notice of the revocation to Applied’s Corporate Secretary at: Applied Materials, Inc., Attention: Teri A. Little, Corporate Secretary, 3225 |
| Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1268, P.O. Box 58039, Santa Clara, CA 95052, or by e-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com, before the proxies vote your shares at the Annual Meeting; or |
Attend the |
Only the latest validly-executed proxy that you submit will be counted.
| Q: | What is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting? |
| A: | A majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote as of the record date must be present at the Annual Meeting to constitute a quorum and in order to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. Your shares are counted as present if you vote |
Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining a quorum.
| Q: | How are votes counted? |
| A: | You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to each of the director nominees. If you elect to abstain from voting on the election of directors, the abstention will not have any effect on the election of directors. In tabulating the voting results for the election of directors, only “FOR” and “AGAINST” votes are counted. |
You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to:
Proposal 2: The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year |
Proposal 3: The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year |
| 78 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
Questions and Answers About the Proxy
Statement and Our 2024 Annual Meeting
| » | Proposal 4: The shareholder proposal regarding lobbying report; |
Proposal 5: The shareholder proposal regarding |
If you elect to abstain from voting on any of these four proposals, the abstention will have the same effect as an “AGAINST” vote with respect to such proposals.
If you are a shareholder of record and you sign and return your proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted on the proposals as recommended by our Board and in accordance with the discretion of the persons named on the proxy card with respect to any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
If your shares are held in street name and you do not instruct your broker on a timely basis on how to vote your shares, your brokerage firm, in its discretion, may either leave your shares unvoted or vote your shares on routine matters. Only the ratification of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is a routine matter. Without your voting instructions, your brokerage firm cannot vote your shares on any other proposal. These unvoted shares, called “broker non-votes,” refer to shares held by brokers who have not received voting instructions from their clients and who do not have discretionary authority to vote on non-routine matters. Broker non-votes are not considered entitled to vote on non-routine proposals. Broker non-votes will not have an effect on Proposals 1, 2, 4 or 5.
| Q: | ||
What is the vote requirement to approve each proposal? |
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR 2022 ANNUAL MEETING
Q: What is the vote requirement to approve each proposal?
| A: | The following table describes the proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting, the vote required to elect directors and to adopt each of the other proposals, and the manner in which votes will be counted: |
Proposal |
|
| Effect of Abstentions | Effect of Broker Non-Votes | ||||
1. Election of ten directors | Majority of votes cast | No effect | No effect | |||||
2. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year | Majority of shares present and entitled to vote thereon | Same as vote against | No effect | |||||
3. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year | Majority of shares present and entitled to vote thereon | Same as vote against | Brokers have discretion to vote | |||||
4. Shareholder proposal regarding | Majority of shares present and entitled to vote thereon | Same as vote against | No effect | |||||
5. Shareholder proposal regarding | Majority of shares present and entitled to vote thereon | Same as vote against | No effect | |||||
| Q: | Who will count the votes? Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting? |
| A: | Votes will be tabulated by an independent inspector of elections appointed for the Annual Meeting. Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final voting results will be reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K, which will be filed with the SEC following the Annual Meeting. |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | 79 |
Questions and Answers About the Proxy
Statement and Our 2024 Annual Meeting
| Q: | Who will bear the cost of soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting? |
| A: | Applied will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, mailing and distribution of the proxy materials. We have hired Innisfree M&A Incorporated to assist in the distribution and solicitation of proxies. Solicitations may be made personally or by mail, facsimile, telephone, messenger, or via the Internet. In addition to the estimated proxy solicitation cost of $20,000, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for this service, we will reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding the proxy materials to shareholders. |
| Q: | Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials? |
| A: | In accordance with SEC rules, we are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily via the Internet, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each shareholder. On January |
This process is designed to expedite shareholders’ receipt of proxy materials, lower the cost of the Annual Meeting, and help conserve natural resources. However, if you would prefer to receive printed proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability. If you have previously elected to receive our proxy materials electronically, you will continue to receive these materials via e-mail unless you elect otherwise.
| Q: | I share an address with another shareholder and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials. How can I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials? |
| A: | Under a practice approved by the SEC called “householding,” shareholders who have the same address and last name and who do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials will receive only one mailed copy of our proxy materials, unless one or more of these shareholders notifies us that they wish to receive individual |
| copies. Shareholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. |
If you share an address with another shareholder and received only one set of proxy materials and would like to request a separate paper copy of these materials, please: (1) go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions provided; (2) send an e-mail message to investor_relations@amat.com with “Request for Proxy Materials” in the subject line and provide your name, address and the control number indicated on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability; or (3) call our Investor Relations department at (408) 748-5227.
OTHER MATTERS
Other Matters
Shareholder Proposals or Nominations for 20232025 Annual Meeting
If a shareholder would like us to consider including a proposal in the proxy statement for our 20232025 Annual Meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, the proposal must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices or by e-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com on or before September 28, 2022.26, 2024.
For a shareholder’s notice of nomination of one or more director candidates to be included in our proxy statement and ballot pursuant to the proxy access right included in Section 2.15 of our Bylaws, it must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices or by e-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com no earlier than August 29, 2022,27, 2024, and no later than the close of business on September 28, 2022.26, 2024. The notice must contain the information required by our Bylaws, and the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) must comply with the information and other
requirements in our Bylaws relating to the inclusion of shareholder nominees in our proxy materials.
If a shareholder seeks to propose other business or nominate a director, but does not seek to include a proposal or director nominee in our proxy statement for our 20232025 Annual Meeting, pursuant to the advance notice provisions of our Bylaws, notice must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than November 25, 2022,22, 2024, and no later than the close of business on December 25, 2022.22, 2024. The notice must contain the information required by our Bylaws, including the information required by Rule 14a-19 of the Exchange Act in the case of a shareholder who intends to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees.
Our Bylaws contain specific requirements regarding a shareholder’s ability to nominate a director or to submit a proposal for consideration at an upcoming meeting. If you would like a copy of our Bylaws, please contact our Corporate Secretary by e-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com.
In Applied’s filings with the SEC, information is sometimes “incorporated by reference.” This means that we are referring you to information that has previously been filed with the SEC and the information should be considered as part of the particular filing. As provided under SEC rules, the “Audit Committee Report” and the “Human Resources and Compensation Committee Report” contained in this Proxy Statement are not incorporated by reference into any of our other filings with the SEC, except to the extent we specifically incorporate either report by reference into a filing. In addition, this Proxy Statement includes several website addresses, including the website where our Sustainability Report can be accessed. These website addresses are intended to provide inactive, textual references only. The information on these websites and in our Sustainability Report is not part of or incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement or any of our other filings with the SEC.
YOU MAY OBTAIN A COPY OF APPLIED’S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 202129, 2023 ON OUR WEBSITE AT www.appliedmaterials.com OR WITHOUT CHARGE BY SENDING A WRITTEN REQUEST TO APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., 3050 BOWERS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 58039, M/S 1261, SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA 95052-8039, ATTN: INVESTOR RELATIONS.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Santa Clara, California
January 26, 202224, 2024
APPENDIX A
UNAUDITED RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP ADJUSTED FINANCIAL MEASURES Appendix A: Unaudited Reconciliation of
Non-GAAP Adjusted Financial Measures
Fiscal Year
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
| (In millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Earnings Per Diluted Share | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reported earnings per diluted share—GAAP basis1 | $ | 6.40 | $ | 3.92 | $ | 2.86 | $ | 2.96 | $ | 3.25 | ||||||||||
Certain items associated with acquisitions2 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.16 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition integration and deal costs | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.02 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Certain incremental expenses related to COVID-193 | 0.02 | 0.03 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Severance and related charges4 | 0.13 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Deal termination fee | 0.17 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Realized loss (gain) on strategic investments, net | (0.03 | ) | — | — | (0.02 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Unrealized loss (gain) on strategic investments, net | (0.05 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.03 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | — | 0.03 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Other charges | 0.01 | — | — | — | (0.01 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income tax effect of changes in applicable U.S. tax laws5 | — | — | (0.03 | ) | 1.08 | — | ||||||||||||||
Income tax effects related to intra-entity intangible asset transfers | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.07 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Resolution of prior years’ income tax filings and other tax items | 0.04 | (0.04 | ) | 0.10 | (0.02 | ) | (0.07 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Non-GAAP adjusted earnings per diluted share | $ | 6.84 | $ | 4.17 | $ | 3.04 | $ | 4.18 | $ | 3.33 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Weighted average number of diluted shares | 919 | 923 | 945 | 1,026 | 1,084 | |||||||||||||||
Unaudited Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Adjusted Financial Measures
|
| Fiscal Year | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| (In millions, except per share amounts) | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Earnings Per Diluted Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reported earnings per diluted share – GAAP basis | $ 8.11 | $ 7.44 | $ 6.40 | $ 3.92 | $ 2.86 | |||||||||||||||
Certain items associated with acquisitions1 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition integration and deal costs | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.02 | |||||||||||||||
Certain incremental expenses related to COVID-192 | — | — | 0.02 | 0.03 | — | |||||||||||||||
Severance and related charges3 | — | — | 0.13 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Deal termination fee | — | — | 0.17 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Realized loss (gain), dividends and impairments on strategic investments, net | 0.13 | — | (0.03 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss (gain) on strategic investments, net | (0.16 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||||||||
Earn-out | (0.01 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | — | — | — | 0.03 | — | |||||||||||||||
Other charges | — | — | 0.01 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Income tax effect of changes in applicable U.S. tax laws4 | — | — | — | — | (0.03 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income tax effects related to intra-entity intangible asset transfers | (0.05 | ) | 0.29 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.07 | ||||||||||||||
Resolution of prior years’ income tax filings and other tax items | (0.04 | ) | (0.09 | ) | 0.04 | (0.04 | ) | 0.10 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Non-GAAP adjusted earnings per diluted share | $ 8.05 | $ 7.70 | $ 6.84 | $ 4.17 | $ 3.04 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Weighted average number of diluted shares | 845 | 877 | 919 | 923 | 945 | |||||||||||||||
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Profit | ||||
Reported gross profit—GAAP basis | $ | 10,914 | ||
Certain items associated with acquisitions1 | 27 | |||
Certain incremental expenses related to COVID-192 | 12 | |||
Other charges | 2 | |||
|
| |||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Profit | $ | 10,955 | ||
|
| |||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Margin (% of net sales) | 47.5 | % | ||
|
|
Fiscal Year
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
| (In millions, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reported operating income—GAAP basis | $ | 6,889 | $ | 4,365 | $ | 3,350 | $ | 4,491 | $ | 3,936 | ||||||||||
Certain items associated with acquisitions1 | 47 | 54 | 55 | 197 | 191 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition integration and deal costs | 45 | 80 | 22 | 5 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
Certain incremental expenses related to COVID-192 | 24 | 30 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Severance and related charges3 | 157 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Deal termination fee | 154 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Other charges | 6 | — | — | — | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Non-GAAP adjusted operating income | $ | 7,322 | $ | 4,529 | $ | 3,427 | $ | 4,693 | $ | 4,118 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin | 31.7 | % | 26.3 | % | 23.5 | % | 28.1 | % | 28.0 | % | ||||||||||
These items are incremental charges attributable to completed acquisitions, consisting of amortization of purchased intangible assets. |
| 2 | Temporary incremental employee compensation during the COVID-19 pandemic. |
| 3 | The severance and related charges primarily related to a one-time voluntary retirement program offered to certain eligible employees. |
Use
| 4 | Charges to income tax provision related to one-time transition tax as a result of U.S. tax legislation. |
| Fiscal Year | ||||
| 2023 | ||||
| (In millions, except percentages) | ||||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Profit | ||||
Reported gross profit – GAAP basis | $12,384 | |||
Certain items associated with acquisitions1 | 29 | |||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Profit | $12,413 | |||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Margin (% of net sales) | 46.8 | % | ||
| 1 | These items are incremental charges attributable to completed acquisitions, consisting of amortization of purchased intangible assets. |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2024 PROXY STATEMENT | A-1 |
Appendix A: Unaudited Reconciliation of
Non-GAAP Adjusted Financial Measures
|
| Fiscal Year | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| (In millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reported operating income – GAAP basis | $7,654 | $7,788 | $6,889 | $4,365 | $3,350 | |||||||||||||||
Certain items associated with acquisitions1 | 43 | 39 | 47 | 54 | 55 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition integration and deal costs | 22 | 38 | 45 | 80 | 22 | |||||||||||||||
Certain incremental expenses related to COVID-192 | — | — | 24 | 30 | — | |||||||||||||||
Severance and related charges3 | — | (4 | ) | 157 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Deal termination fee | — | — | 154 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Other charges | — | — | 6 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Non-GAAP adjusted operating income | $7,719 | $7,861 | $7,322 | $4,529 | $3,427 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin | 29.1 | % | 30.5 | % | 31.7 | % | 26.3 | % | 23.5 | % | ||||||||||
| 1 | These items are incremental charges attributable to completed acquisitions, consisting of amortization of purchased intangible assets. |
| 2 | Temporary incremental employee compensation during the COVID-19 pandemic. |
| 3 | The severance and related charges primarily related to a one-time voluntary retirement program offered to certain eligible employees. |
| Fiscal Year | ||||
| 2023 | ||||
| (In millions) | ||||
Free Cash Flow | ||||
Cash provided by operating activities | $ 8,700 | |||
Capital expenditures | (1,106 | ) | ||
Non-GAAP free cash flow | $ 7,594 | |||
Use of Non-GAAP Adjusted Financial Measures
Management uses non-GAAP adjusted financial measures to evaluate the Company’s operating and financial performance and for planning purposes, and as performance measures in its executive compensation program. Applied believes these measures enhance an overall understanding of its performance and investors’ ability to review the Company’s business from the same perspective as the Company’s management, and facilitate comparisons of this period’s results with prior periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that management does not believe are indicative of Applied’s ongoing operating performance.
The non-GAAP adjusted financial measures presented above are adjusted to exclude the impact of certain costs, expenses, gains and losses, including certain items related to mergers and acquisitions; restructuring and severance charges and any associated adjustments; certain incremental expenses related to COVID-19; impairments of assets; gain or loss, dividends and impairments on strategic investments; loss on early extinguishment of debt; certain income tax items and other discrete adjustments. Additionally, On a non-GAAP results exclude estimated discrete income basis, the tax expense items associated with U.S. tax legislation.effect related to share-based compensation is recognized ratably over the fiscal year. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP are provided in the financial tables presented above. There are limitations in using non-GAAP financial measures because the non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies, and may exclude certain items that may have a material impact upon our reported financial results. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.
| A-2 |
3050 BOWERS AVENUE P.O. BOX 58039, M/S 5030 SANTA CLARA, CA 95054 |
YOU CAN VOTE OVER THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE QUICK · EASY · CONVENIENT
|
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. encourages you to take advantage of convenient ways to vote. If voting by proxy, you may vote over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote in the same manner as if you marked, signed, and returned your proxy card. To vote over the Internet, by telephone or by mail, please read the 2024 Proxy Statement and then follow these easy steps: |
VOTE BY INTERNET Go towww.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on March 6, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. |
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Applied Materials, Inc. in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically over the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in the future. |
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on March 6, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. |
VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. |
| TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | ||||
| V28572-P01901 | KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS | |||
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
| THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. | DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY |
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. encourages you to take advantage of convenient ways to vote. If voting by proxy, you may vote over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote in the same manner as if you marked, signed, and returned your proxy card. To vote over the Internet, by telephone or by mail, please read the 2022 Proxy Statement and then follow these easy steps: VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on March 9, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed below in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Applied Materials, Inc. in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically over the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in the future. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on March 9, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: D65637-P65858 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR all of the nominees listed below and FOR management proposals 2 and 3: 1. Election of Directors Nominees: Abstain Against For 1a. Rani Borkar 1b. Judy Bruner 1c. Xun (Eric) Chen 1d. Aart J. de Geus 1e. Gary E. Dickerson 1f. Thomas J. Iannotti 1g. Alexander A. Karsner 1h. Adrianna C. Ma 1i. Yvonne McGill 1j. Scott A. McGregor Against For Abstain 2. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of Applied Materials’ named executive officers for fiscal year 2021. 3. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as Applied Materials’ independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022. The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST shareholder proposals 4 and 5: Abstain Against For 4. Shareholder proposal to amend the appropriate company governing documents to give the owners of a combined 10% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareholder meeting. 5. Shareholder proposal to improve the executive compensation program and policy, such as to include the CEO pay ratio factor and voices from employees. NOTE: The proposals to be voted on may also include such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Please sign exactly as your name appears herein. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR all of the nominees listed below and FOR management proposals 2 and 3: | ||||||||||
| 1. | Election of Directors | |||||||
Nominees: | For | Against | Abstain | |||||||||
1a. Rani Borkar | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1b. Judy Bruner | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1c. Xun (Eric) Chen | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1d. Aart J. de Geus | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1e. Gary E. Dickerson | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1f. Thomas J. Iannotti | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1g. Alexander A. Karsner | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1h. Kevin P. March | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1i. Yvonne McGill | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
1j. Scott A. McGregor | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||
| For | Against | Abstain | ||||||||
| 2. | Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of Applied Materials' named executive officers for fiscal year 2023. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as Applied Materials' independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2024. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||
| The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST shareholder proposals 4 and 5: | For | Against | Abstain | |||||||
| 4. | Shareholder proposal requesting that Applied Materials prepare a report disclosing Applied Materials’ policy and procedures governing lobbying and payments by Applied Materials used for lobbying. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||
| 6. | Shareholder proposal requesting that Applied Materials report on quantitative median and adjusted pay gaps across race and gender. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||
| NOTE: The proposals to be voted on may also include such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. | ||||||||||
Please sign exactly as your name appears herein. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. | ||||||||
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date |
Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 10, 2022:7, 2024: The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available atwww.proxyvote.com. D65638-P65858 APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS ON MARCH 10, 2022 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned hereby appoints Gary E. Dickerson and Teri A. Little, or either of them, each with full power of substitution, as proxies of the undersigned, to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Applied Materials, Inc. to be held virtually at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022 on Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, and to vote the number of shares the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present on the items set forth on the reverse side and, in their discretion, upon such other business that may properly come before such meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED, OR IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH OF THE TEN NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1), FOR THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021 (PROPOSAL 2), FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022 (PROPOSAL 3), AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE APPROPRIATE COMPANY GOVERNING DOCUMENTS TO GIVE THE OWNERS OF A COMBINED 10% OF OUR OUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK THE POWER TO CALL A SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING (PROPOSAL 4), AND AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL TO IMPROVE THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND POLICY, SUCH AS TO INCLUDE THE CEO PAY RATIO FACTOR AND VOICES FROM EMPLOYEES (PROPOSAL 5). Dear Shareholder: On the reverse side of this card are instructions on how to vote over the Internet or by telephone for the election of directors (Proposal 1), for the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 2021 (Proposal 2), for the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022 (Proposal 3), against the shareholder proposal to amend the appropriate company governing documents to give the owners of a combined 10% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareholder meeting (Proposal 4), and against the shareholder proposal to improve the executive compensation program and policy, such as to include the CEO pay ratio factor and voices from employees (Proposal 5). Please consider voting over the Internet or by telephone. Your vote is recorded as if you mailed in your proxy card. We believe voting this way is convenient. Thank you for your attention to these matters. Applied Materials, Inc. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE. If you vote over the Internet or by telephone, you do not need to return the proxy card. THANK YOU FOR VOTING! (Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)www.proxyvote.com.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
V28573-P01901
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS ON MARCH 7, 2024 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned hereby appoints Gary E. Dickerson, Brice Hill and Teri A. Little, or any of them, each with full power of substitution, as proxies of the undersigned, to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Applied Materials, Inc. to be held on Thursday, March 7, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. Central Time at Applied Materials, Inc.’s offices at 9700 US 290 East, Building 37, Austin, Texas 78724, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, and to vote the number of shares the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present on the items set forth on the reverse side and, in their discretion, upon such other business that may properly come before such meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED, OR IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH OF THE TEN NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1), FOR THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023 (PROPOSAL 2), FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 (PROPOSAL 3), AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING THAT THE COMPANY PREPARE A REPORT DISCLOSING COMPANY POLICY AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING LOBBYING AND PAYMENTS BY THE COMPANY USED FOR LOBBYING (PROPOSAL 4), AND AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING THAT THE COMPANY REPORT ON QUANTITATIVE MEDIAN AND ADJUSTED PAY GAPS ACROSS RACE AND GENDER (PROPOSAL 5). Dear Shareholder: On the reverse side of this card are instructions on how to vote over the Internet or by telephone for the election of directors (Proposal 1), for the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 2023 (Proposal 2), for the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2024 (Proposal 3), against the shareholder proposal requesting that the Company prepare a report disclosing Company policy and procedures governing lobbying and payments by the Company used for lobbying (Proposal 4), and against the shareholder proposal requesting that the Company report on quantitative median and adjusted pay gaps across race and gender (Proposal 5). Please consider voting over the Internet or by telephone. Your vote is recorded as if you mailed in your proxy card. We believe voting this way is convenient. Thank you for your attention to these matters. Applied Materials, Inc. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE. If you vote over the Internet or by telephone, you do not need to return the proxy card. THANK YOU FOR VOTING! (Continued and to be signed on the reverse side) |